19.06.2014 Views

Volume 6, Spring 2008 - Saddleback College

Volume 6, Spring 2008 - Saddleback College

Volume 6, Spring 2008 - Saddleback College

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Fall 2007 Biology 3A Abstracts<br />

Figure 1. Average inhibition growth of E. coli after the<br />

first 48 hour period. Error bars indicate SE. Average<br />

inhibited growth of E. coli in 1.0% AgNO3 was 0.52 ± 0.11<br />

(SE). The 0.5% AgNO3 sample obtained an average<br />

inhibition of 0.26 ± 0.02 (SE). A two tailed t- test was<br />

calculated to have a p value of 0.08.<br />

The inhition growth of E. coli under the two<br />

types of silver nitrate solutions appeared to increase<br />

within the 1.0% sample over a 96 hour period as<br />

shown in Figure 2, but started to remain constant<br />

within the 0.5% silver nitrate samples. Although the<br />

inhibition growth increased in both concentrations<br />

there was no net significance in the first trial, P value<br />

was more than 0.05 (p = 0.08). The experiment was<br />

run for 48 hours longer to further determine if there<br />

was a significance in inhibition. After the second trial<br />

p= 0.008, which indicated a statistical significance in<br />

the inhibition growth of E. coli under the 1.0%<br />

solution. The final results confirm our initial<br />

hypothesis and conclude that there is a statistical<br />

difference in the inhibition growth of E. coli under<br />

both silver nitrate solutions.<br />

concentration. According to an article by Wong and<br />

Jelacic (2000) in the New England Journal of<br />

Medicine, individuals that were treated with<br />

antibiotics for E. coli infection experienced<br />

symptoms of hemolytic uremic syndrome. Factors<br />

significantly associated with the hemolytic–uremic<br />

syndrome were a higher initial white-cell count<br />

(relative risk, 1.3; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.1<br />

to 1.5), evaluation with stool culture soon after the<br />

onset of illness (relative risk, 0.3; 95 percent<br />

confidence interval, 0.2 to 0.8), and treatment with<br />

antibiotics (relative risk, 14.3; 95 percent confidence<br />

interval, 2.9 to 70.7). Through trial and error<br />

investigators can uncover the most effective<br />

antibacterial agent to ward off E. coli. The 1.0%<br />

silver nitrate concentration did exhibit growth<br />

inhibition, as well as the 0.5% silver nitrate<br />

concentration and the results concluded that there is a<br />

significant difference with the use of silver nitrate.<br />

Previous investigators had similar findings in with<br />

the use of silver derivatives such as Feng and Wu,<br />

who concluded that morphological changes took<br />

place in bacteria treated with silver ions. Jack and<br />

Tagg also found that gram positive strains of bacteria,<br />

such as E. coli, can only by inhibited by<br />

destabilization of membrane functions. A function<br />

known of silver nitrate is to cause destruction of the<br />

cell according to Sondi and Sondi. This knowledge is<br />

a positive indication that silver nitrate is effective in<br />

the inhibition of E. coli, and if it could be derived in<br />

antibiotic form to treat infected humans, it would be a<br />

turning point in the field of medicine and bacterial<br />

control.<br />

Literature Cited<br />

Feng, Q.L. and Wu, J. (2000). A mechanic study of<br />

the antibacterial effect of silver ions on Escherichia<br />

coli and Staphylococcus aureus. Journal of<br />

Biomedical Materials Research. 52: 662-668.<br />

Figure 2. Average inhibition growth of E. coli after the<br />

second 48 hour period. Error bars indicate SE. Average<br />

inhibited growth of E. coli in 1.0% AgNO3 was 0.57 ± 0.06<br />

(SE). The 0.5% AgNO3 sample obtained an average<br />

inhibition of 0.26 ± 0.01 (SE). A two tailed t- test was<br />

calculated to have a p value of 0.008.<br />

Discussion<br />

Growth inhibition of E. coli and many other<br />

bacteria has been an issue at large in the medical field<br />

and investigators continue to pursue new research<br />

methods to improve the modes of treatment. The<br />

results of this trial concluded that there is a<br />

statistically significant difference in the inhibiting<br />

growth of E. coli between the 0.5% silver nitrate<br />

concentration and the 1.0% silver nitrate<br />

Jack, R.W. and Tagg J.R. (1995). Bacteriocins of<br />

gram positive bacteria. Microbiology and Molecular<br />

Biology Reviews. 171-200, Vol 59, No. 2<br />

Nataro, J and Kaper, J. (1998) Diarrheagenic<br />

Escherichia coli. Clinical Microbiology Reviews. p.<br />

142-201, Vol. 11, No. 1<br />

Schreurs, W.J. and Rosenberg, H. (1982) Effect of<br />

silver ions on transport and retention of phosphate by<br />

Escherichia coli. Journal of Bacteriology. 152: 7-13<br />

Sondi, I. and Sondi, B. (2004) Silver nanoparticles as<br />

antimicrobial agent: a case study on E. coli as a<br />

model for Gram-negative bacteria. Journal of Colloid<br />

and Interface Science. 275: 177-182<br />

16<br />

<strong>Saddleback</strong> Journal of Biology<br />

<strong>Spring</strong> <strong>2008</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!