19.06.2014 Views

Volume 6, Spring 2008 - Saddleback College

Volume 6, Spring 2008 - Saddleback College

Volume 6, Spring 2008 - Saddleback College

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Fall 2007 Biology 3A Abstracts<br />

species of insects remain relatively unknown. The<br />

amount of oxygen input or carbon dioxide output in a<br />

resting state may differ substantially than a flying form<br />

of locomotion, contributed by factors such as dietary<br />

energy content or temperature, even among species of<br />

similar body masses. However, there is a direct<br />

relationship between metabolic rate and body mass:<br />

metabolic rate per gram of body mass decreases with<br />

mass by a power less than 1.0 (Mueller & Diamond,<br />

2001), therefore the total metabolic rate of an animal<br />

increases proportionally with mass.<br />

Gromphadorhina portentosa is a species of<br />

large hissing cockroaches originating from<br />

Madagascar. No published previous experiments have<br />

been conducted on metabolic rates of this species.<br />

Gathering information about furtive, hissing roaches<br />

could offer insight for the comparison of energy costs<br />

of a more diverse range of insects.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

Procedure A. Cockroach metabolism at ambient,<br />

elevated, and cold temperatures<br />

Eight Madagascan hissing cockroaches were<br />

individually placed on an analytical balance; weights<br />

recorded (g) and labeled 1-8 for identification. Each<br />

roach was placed in a plastic container and sealed by a<br />

stopper that encircled a Pasco Temperature Sensor<br />

attached to a Pasco Xplorer GLX device used to<br />

measure carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) production in parts per<br />

million (ppm) with readings every second (sec) for 15<br />

minutes. Food consumption was restricted from the<br />

roaches for at least one hour prior to testing to<br />

eliminate increased metabolic rate from postabsorption.<br />

MRs of the roaches were to be observed at<br />

three variables: room temperature (23.0C), cold<br />

(10.0C), and an elevated temperature (39.0C). They<br />

were labeled according to weight and left to acclimate<br />

to their ambient temperature and surroundings for 10<br />

minutes. Roaches were handled carefully to keep them<br />

in a calm state; sudden movements may lead to an error<br />

in analyzing the results. The concentration of CO 2 in<br />

the closed system of the container was recorded onto<br />

the Xplorer GLX every second for 15 minutes.<br />

Between each test, the roaches were released to their<br />

normal surroundings to stabilize metabolic rates so<br />

there would not be extreme changes in CO 2 production.<br />

This same procedure was repeated with the<br />

warm temperature, except the system was left in a<br />

heating chamber adjusted to 39.0C. A light was<br />

installed to replicate the room temperature environment<br />

and to encourage the roaches to stay in an aroused, but<br />

resting, state. The procedure was again repeated for<br />

cold temperature. A thermoregulated refrigerator set at<br />

10.0C was used with a light set inside to maintain<br />

constant environmental factors.<br />

Once complete, the data was transferred from<br />

the Xplorer to a flash drive device and the table of<br />

information (ppm/sec) was transferred as a .glx file to<br />

be analyzed using Pasco’s Data Studio, and exported as<br />

a text file (.txt) that could be read using Microsoft<br />

Excel.<br />

Procedure B. Calculating the rate of oxygen<br />

consumption (STP)<br />

To determine the metabolic rate of G.<br />

portentosa, the data from all the roaches were graphed<br />

as a scatter plot and a linear trendline was added. The<br />

slope of this line was the rate of CO 2 production<br />

(ppm/sec) and had to be set as a ratio to the amount of<br />

moles (mol) of air in the container. This was calculated<br />

by obtaining the volume of the container the, minus the<br />

volume of the CO 2 sensor probe and the individual<br />

roaches. <strong>Volume</strong>s were measured by filling the<br />

container to the brim with water and pouring all the<br />

liquid into a graduated cylinder, the final volume was<br />

the volume of the container. The volume of the<br />

cockroaches (V total ) was determined by submerging<br />

them into a 250mL graduated cylinder of a known<br />

initial volume (V i ) of liquid and subtracting that from<br />

the final volume (V f ):<br />

V total = V f – V i<br />

The CO 2 sensor probe was found in a similar fashion<br />

but with an 800mL beaker.<br />

The volume of air in the container was<br />

converted to standard temperature and pressure (STP)<br />

using Boyle’s Gas Law:<br />

P 1 V 1 = P 2 V 2<br />

T 1 T 2<br />

P 1 = atmospheric pressure (atm)<br />

V 1 = volume of air in container (L)<br />

T 1 = temperature variables (C)<br />

P 2 = 1.00 atm<br />

V 2 = volume of air in container at STP<br />

T 2 = 273.15K<br />

Atmospheric pressure (P 1 ) was found using a<br />

barometer in an adjacent room. The temperature, T 1 ,<br />

was the environment in which the roaches were set in.<br />

The adjusted volume was then converted to moles of<br />

air in the container by the Ideal Gas Law:<br />

PV = nRT n = RT<br />

PV<br />

P = pressure (atm)<br />

V = volume (L)<br />

n = moles of air in container<br />

R = gas constant (0.08206 Latm/molK)<br />

T = temperature (K)<br />

Using the graph of the CO 2 concentrations<br />

versus time, a linear fit trendline was added in addition<br />

45<br />

<strong>Saddleback</strong> Journal of Biology<br />

<strong>Spring</strong> <strong>2008</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!