Volume 6, Spring 2008 - Saddleback College
Volume 6, Spring 2008 - Saddleback College
Volume 6, Spring 2008 - Saddleback College
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Fall 2007 Biology 3A Abstracts<br />
story. Many attempts have been made to quantify<br />
the nature of beauty, specifically the elements of<br />
attraction which influence mate selection. Thus far<br />
the study of attraction has identified several<br />
influential components of heterosexual attraction<br />
specifically body form, pheromones, and<br />
reproductive cycles. Body form studies have<br />
focused mainly on distinct facial features in males<br />
and females, certain facial features have been<br />
hypothesized to have a direct correlation to<br />
physical attractiveness. Facial symmetry has been<br />
directly linked to attractiveness in both male and<br />
female faces (Rhodes 1998). Male facial features<br />
with high degrees of masculinity were found to<br />
confer attractiveness, a large square jaw was found<br />
to be a visual cue of attractiveness in male faces<br />
(Grammer & Thornhill 1994). However some<br />
research has concluded that it is a mixture of<br />
masculine and feminine traits, not the<br />
predominance of either one that is often found<br />
attractive (Cummingham 1990).<br />
Hypothesizes have also proposed that females<br />
find certain male features attractive to varying<br />
degrees during distinct phases of their reproductive<br />
cycles (Penton-Voak & Perrett 2000). Never the<br />
less, a correlation has been established between<br />
certain male facial features and attractiveness.<br />
Additionally a man’s distinct body odor has been<br />
linked to his attractiveness and desirability as a<br />
mate (Hertz & Cahill, 1997). Appropriately it is a<br />
combination of a man’s pheromones “his scent”<br />
and his facial features that determine his level of<br />
attractiveness to potential mates. The evolutionary<br />
significance of attractiveness seems to play a role<br />
in “good gene” selection; one such gene appears to<br />
be the major histocompatibility gene complex<br />
(MHC) (Thornhill et al. 2003). MHC genes play a<br />
key role in pathogen recognition and immune<br />
response and therefore evolutionary fitness of<br />
couples’ offspring. The MHC gene has a direct<br />
influence on body odor and therefore an influence<br />
on mate choice (Thornhill et al 2003). Pheromones<br />
have also been linked to traits of facial<br />
attractiveness. Studies have shown that the body<br />
odor of men with symmetrical facial features was<br />
found to be more attractive to women during their<br />
menstrual cycle (Rikowski & Grammer, 1999).<br />
The objective of this experiment is to study the<br />
correlation between a man’s level of attractiveness<br />
based on his facial features and his attractiveness<br />
based on his body odor. It is expected that there<br />
will be a significant positive correlation between a<br />
man’s attractiveness based on his physical features<br />
and body odor.<br />
Materials and Methods<br />
Three packages of large plain white t-<br />
shirts (n=9) were purchased from Wal-mart in<br />
Laguna Niguel, California. Each shirt was then<br />
washed to remove any scent absorbed during<br />
production. The shirts were then packaged into<br />
Zip-lock double zipper plastic bags numbered 1-9.<br />
Each t-shirt was distributed to 9 different males<br />
ranging in age from 18-23. The shirts were worn<br />
for 3 nights by each male participant, allowing<br />
proper time for their scent to infuse into the<br />
material. Each shirt was then collected along with<br />
a current photograph of the participant, allowing<br />
for proper current portrayal of each individual to<br />
test for a correlation. Each male individual was<br />
numbered based on the t-shirt they were given, and<br />
each shirt correlated with a differently numbered<br />
picture to maintain consistent results throughout<br />
the rating process.<br />
The following day, 15 female participants<br />
were asked to rate each of the 9 male participants<br />
at random on a scale of 1 to 5 based on physical<br />
appearance, and then based on the scent of their t-<br />
shirts. The results were recorded by each female<br />
participant on a provided survey sheet. The<br />
following day, each male participant’s appearance<br />
and scent ratings were totaled up and averaged out<br />
to the nearest hundredth.<br />
Results were calculated and compared<br />
using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient test.<br />
Data significance would be determined by having<br />
an r 2 value greater than 0 and less than 1,<br />
demonstrating a correlation in ratings between<br />
appearance and scent of each male individual<br />
rated.<br />
Results<br />
The correlation in mean ratings of each<br />
male individual based on appearance and scent<br />
(Fig 1). Results were calculated using Spearman’s<br />
rank correlation coefficient formula as:<br />
A correlation coefficient of (r = 3.6 x 10 -1 ) was<br />
calculated using the formula shown above,<br />
supporting our hypothesis. Raw averages for each<br />
individual male (Table 1) shows the range of<br />
scores. A value of p was calculated as (p > 1.0 x<br />
10 -1 ), rejecting the null hypothesis and supporting<br />
our hypothesis. Mean ratings based on appearance<br />
were 2.87, and mean ratings based on scent were<br />
2.82 (Table 1). Overall difference in mean values<br />
was + 0.05. Positive linear correlation between<br />
99<br />
<strong>Saddleback</strong> Journal of Biology<br />
<strong>Spring</strong> <strong>2008</strong>