19.06.2014 Views

Volume 6, Spring 2008 - Saddleback College

Volume 6, Spring 2008 - Saddleback College

Volume 6, Spring 2008 - Saddleback College

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Fall 2007 Biology 3A Abstracts<br />

story. Many attempts have been made to quantify<br />

the nature of beauty, specifically the elements of<br />

attraction which influence mate selection. Thus far<br />

the study of attraction has identified several<br />

influential components of heterosexual attraction<br />

specifically body form, pheromones, and<br />

reproductive cycles. Body form studies have<br />

focused mainly on distinct facial features in males<br />

and females, certain facial features have been<br />

hypothesized to have a direct correlation to<br />

physical attractiveness. Facial symmetry has been<br />

directly linked to attractiveness in both male and<br />

female faces (Rhodes 1998). Male facial features<br />

with high degrees of masculinity were found to<br />

confer attractiveness, a large square jaw was found<br />

to be a visual cue of attractiveness in male faces<br />

(Grammer & Thornhill 1994). However some<br />

research has concluded that it is a mixture of<br />

masculine and feminine traits, not the<br />

predominance of either one that is often found<br />

attractive (Cummingham 1990).<br />

Hypothesizes have also proposed that females<br />

find certain male features attractive to varying<br />

degrees during distinct phases of their reproductive<br />

cycles (Penton-Voak & Perrett 2000). Never the<br />

less, a correlation has been established between<br />

certain male facial features and attractiveness.<br />

Additionally a man’s distinct body odor has been<br />

linked to his attractiveness and desirability as a<br />

mate (Hertz & Cahill, 1997). Appropriately it is a<br />

combination of a man’s pheromones “his scent”<br />

and his facial features that determine his level of<br />

attractiveness to potential mates. The evolutionary<br />

significance of attractiveness seems to play a role<br />

in “good gene” selection; one such gene appears to<br />

be the major histocompatibility gene complex<br />

(MHC) (Thornhill et al. 2003). MHC genes play a<br />

key role in pathogen recognition and immune<br />

response and therefore evolutionary fitness of<br />

couples’ offspring. The MHC gene has a direct<br />

influence on body odor and therefore an influence<br />

on mate choice (Thornhill et al 2003). Pheromones<br />

have also been linked to traits of facial<br />

attractiveness. Studies have shown that the body<br />

odor of men with symmetrical facial features was<br />

found to be more attractive to women during their<br />

menstrual cycle (Rikowski & Grammer, 1999).<br />

The objective of this experiment is to study the<br />

correlation between a man’s level of attractiveness<br />

based on his facial features and his attractiveness<br />

based on his body odor. It is expected that there<br />

will be a significant positive correlation between a<br />

man’s attractiveness based on his physical features<br />

and body odor.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

Three packages of large plain white t-<br />

shirts (n=9) were purchased from Wal-mart in<br />

Laguna Niguel, California. Each shirt was then<br />

washed to remove any scent absorbed during<br />

production. The shirts were then packaged into<br />

Zip-lock double zipper plastic bags numbered 1-9.<br />

Each t-shirt was distributed to 9 different males<br />

ranging in age from 18-23. The shirts were worn<br />

for 3 nights by each male participant, allowing<br />

proper time for their scent to infuse into the<br />

material. Each shirt was then collected along with<br />

a current photograph of the participant, allowing<br />

for proper current portrayal of each individual to<br />

test for a correlation. Each male individual was<br />

numbered based on the t-shirt they were given, and<br />

each shirt correlated with a differently numbered<br />

picture to maintain consistent results throughout<br />

the rating process.<br />

The following day, 15 female participants<br />

were asked to rate each of the 9 male participants<br />

at random on a scale of 1 to 5 based on physical<br />

appearance, and then based on the scent of their t-<br />

shirts. The results were recorded by each female<br />

participant on a provided survey sheet. The<br />

following day, each male participant’s appearance<br />

and scent ratings were totaled up and averaged out<br />

to the nearest hundredth.<br />

Results were calculated and compared<br />

using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient test.<br />

Data significance would be determined by having<br />

an r 2 value greater than 0 and less than 1,<br />

demonstrating a correlation in ratings between<br />

appearance and scent of each male individual<br />

rated.<br />

Results<br />

The correlation in mean ratings of each<br />

male individual based on appearance and scent<br />

(Fig 1). Results were calculated using Spearman’s<br />

rank correlation coefficient formula as:<br />

A correlation coefficient of (r = 3.6 x 10 -1 ) was<br />

calculated using the formula shown above,<br />

supporting our hypothesis. Raw averages for each<br />

individual male (Table 1) shows the range of<br />

scores. A value of p was calculated as (p > 1.0 x<br />

10 -1 ), rejecting the null hypothesis and supporting<br />

our hypothesis. Mean ratings based on appearance<br />

were 2.87, and mean ratings based on scent were<br />

2.82 (Table 1). Overall difference in mean values<br />

was + 0.05. Positive linear correlation between<br />

99<br />

<strong>Saddleback</strong> Journal of Biology<br />

<strong>Spring</strong> <strong>2008</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!