11.07.2014 Views

Assessment of Conversion Technologies for Bioalcohol Fuel ...

Assessment of Conversion Technologies for Bioalcohol Fuel ...

Assessment of Conversion Technologies for Bioalcohol Fuel ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

For all <strong>of</strong> the biomass resource categories covered, the Billion Ton Study incorporates<br />

growth factor assumptions on top <strong>of</strong> present-day resource inventories, along with other<br />

assumptions intended to result in a single realistic estimate <strong>of</strong> producible biomass.<br />

The authors suggest that this estimated national biomass resource potential “can be<br />

produced with relatively modest changes in land use, and agricultural and <strong>for</strong>estry<br />

practices. This potential, however, should not be thought <strong>of</strong> as an upper limit. It is just<br />

a scenario based on a set <strong>of</strong>reasonable assumptions.”<br />

Cali<strong>for</strong>nia’s Biomass Resources<br />

Cali<strong>for</strong>nia’s biomass resource potential has been the subject <strong>of</strong> a series <strong>of</strong> studies<br />

conducted by the CEC and other organizations since the early 1990s (Tiangco, et al.,<br />

1994). The 1999 CEC inventory was intended to quantify the gross amounts <strong>of</strong><br />

biomass produced in the state annually, not what could realistically be expected to be<br />

collected and delivered <strong>for</strong> bioenergy production or other beneficial uses (Blackburn,<br />

1999). Thus the 50 plus million tons per year overall estimate was conditioned with<br />

the statement that “the actual amount <strong>of</strong> residues available wil be significantly lower<br />

once economic, technological and institutional factors are considered.” The CEC<br />

inventory did not attempt to project potential future growth in the estimated biomass<br />

resources, but suggested that some categories <strong>of</strong> biomass wastes and residues would<br />

be expected to increase while others might decrease.<br />

More recently, in 2004, the Cali<strong>for</strong>nia Biomass Collaborative (CBC), under<br />

sponsorship <strong>of</strong> the CEC, conducted An <strong>Assessment</strong> <strong>of</strong> Biomass Resources in<br />

Cali<strong>for</strong>nia (Jenkins et al., 2005). CBC also provided an update <strong>of</strong> this work to support<br />

the Commission’s 2005 Integrated Energy Policy Report (Jenkins, 2005). TheCBC’s<br />

assessments represent the most detailed inventory <strong>of</strong> the state’s biomass wastes and<br />

residues to date, with the most specific sub-categorization <strong>of</strong> these biomass resources<br />

and including a county level resource distribution. The CBC 2005 biomass resource<br />

estimate is summarized in Table 6. The gross resource estimate is said to have an<br />

uncertainty factor <strong>of</strong> about 10 percent.<br />

47

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!