Annual Report 2010 - Christchurch City Council
Annual Report 2010 - Christchurch City Council
Annual Report 2010 - Christchurch City Council
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Regulatory services<br />
<strong>Council</strong> activities and<br />
services<br />
<strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong><br />
<strong>Christchurch</strong> Otautahi<br />
<strong>2010</strong><br />
p99.<br />
<strong>Council</strong> activities and services<br />
Regulatory services<br />
What did it cost?<br />
Statement of cost of services for the year ending 30 June <strong>2010</strong><br />
Costs (after<br />
internal<br />
recoveries)<br />
Income Net cost Plan net<br />
cost<br />
<strong>2010</strong> 2009<br />
Net cost<br />
$000s $000s $000s $000s $000s<br />
Operational service result<br />
Enforcement and inspections 11,016 8,911 2,105 507 (1,909)<br />
Regulatory approvals 18,912 16,350 2,562 3,081 6,398<br />
Cost of service 29,928 25,261 4,667 3,588 4,489<br />
Capital expenditure<br />
Renewals and replacements 90 10 42<br />
Improved service levels 45 49 -<br />
Increased demand - - -<br />
Total capital expenditure 135 59 42<br />
Explanation of significant cost of service variances<br />
Enforcement and inspections net cost of service was $1.6 million<br />
more than plan. This was due to several factors including less<br />
infringement revenue for bus lanes, less revenue for court<br />
recoveries, high legal costs for party buses and other enforcement,<br />
and higher costs than plan for noise control.<br />
Enforcement and inspections net cost of service was $4.0 million<br />
more than last year. $3.2 million is due to a change in accounting<br />
procedure in 2008/09 when parking fines referred to the Courts<br />
for collection were recognised on an accrual basis rather than a<br />
cash basis as in previous years. There were also higher net costs for<br />
enforcement, environmental compliance and noise control of $0.4<br />
million.<br />
Regulatory approvals net cost of service was $0.5 million below<br />
plan largely due to more revenue for Code of Compliance and LIM’s.<br />
Regulatory approvals net cost of service was $3.8 million less than<br />
last year due to additional code compliance revenue ($0.5 million),<br />
building consents revenue ($0.6 million) and lower consultants<br />
expenditure ($1 million). The provision for weather tight homes in<br />
2009/10 increased by $0.2 million compared to an increase of $2.2<br />
million in 2008/09. Actual weather tight home claim costs however<br />
were $0.65 million more in 2009/10 than in 2008/09. This was due<br />
to more claims being settled and at a higher average cost.<br />
Significant capital expenditure<br />
There was no significant capital expenditure. Renewals and<br />
replacements expenditure was $80,000 over plan due to the<br />
purchase of dual computer screens<br />
Explanation of significant capital expenditure variances<br />
There were no significant variances.