02.10.2014 Views

Annual Report 2010 - Christchurch City Council

Annual Report 2010 - Christchurch City Council

Annual Report 2010 - Christchurch City Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Regulatory services<br />

<strong>Council</strong> activities and<br />

services<br />

<strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong><br />

<strong>Christchurch</strong> Otautahi<br />

<strong>2010</strong><br />

p99.<br />

<strong>Council</strong> activities and services<br />

Regulatory services<br />

What did it cost?<br />

Statement of cost of services for the year ending 30 June <strong>2010</strong><br />

Costs (after<br />

internal<br />

recoveries)<br />

Income Net cost Plan net<br />

cost<br />

<strong>2010</strong> 2009<br />

Net cost<br />

$000s $000s $000s $000s $000s<br />

Operational service result<br />

Enforcement and inspections 11,016 8,911 2,105 507 (1,909)<br />

Regulatory approvals 18,912 16,350 2,562 3,081 6,398<br />

Cost of service 29,928 25,261 4,667 3,588 4,489<br />

Capital expenditure<br />

Renewals and replacements 90 10 42<br />

Improved service levels 45 49 -<br />

Increased demand - - -<br />

Total capital expenditure 135 59 42<br />

Explanation of significant cost of service variances<br />

Enforcement and inspections net cost of service was $1.6 million<br />

more than plan. This was due to several factors including less<br />

infringement revenue for bus lanes, less revenue for court<br />

recoveries, high legal costs for party buses and other enforcement,<br />

and higher costs than plan for noise control.<br />

Enforcement and inspections net cost of service was $4.0 million<br />

more than last year. $3.2 million is due to a change in accounting<br />

procedure in 2008/09 when parking fines referred to the Courts<br />

for collection were recognised on an accrual basis rather than a<br />

cash basis as in previous years. There were also higher net costs for<br />

enforcement, environmental compliance and noise control of $0.4<br />

million.<br />

Regulatory approvals net cost of service was $0.5 million below<br />

plan largely due to more revenue for Code of Compliance and LIM’s.<br />

Regulatory approvals net cost of service was $3.8 million less than<br />

last year due to additional code compliance revenue ($0.5 million),<br />

building consents revenue ($0.6 million) and lower consultants<br />

expenditure ($1 million). The provision for weather tight homes in<br />

2009/10 increased by $0.2 million compared to an increase of $2.2<br />

million in 2008/09. Actual weather tight home claim costs however<br />

were $0.65 million more in 2009/10 than in 2008/09. This was due<br />

to more claims being settled and at a higher average cost.<br />

Significant capital expenditure<br />

There was no significant capital expenditure. Renewals and<br />

replacements expenditure was $80,000 over plan due to the<br />

purchase of dual computer screens<br />

Explanation of significant capital expenditure variances<br />

There were no significant variances.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!