final program.qxd - Parallels Plesk Panel
final program.qxd - Parallels Plesk Panel
final program.qxd - Parallels Plesk Panel
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
FP 1.4<br />
V1V2 loop length variation during HIV-1 infection<br />
Yi Liu 2 , Wenjie Deng 2 , Geoffrey Gottlieb 1,2, , Rafael Zioni 2 , Marcel E. Curlin 1 Tuofu Zhu 2,3,<br />
James I. Mullins 1,2,3<br />
University of washington Departments of Medicine 1 , Microbiology 2 and Laboratory<br />
Medicine 3 ; University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington.<br />
Objective We sought to determine the relationship between envelope hypervariable region<br />
loop-length and disease progression and transmission to a new host during HIV infection.<br />
Methods Sequences were derived from published and unpublished envelope sub-regions<br />
from treatment-naive adult subjects harboring HIV-1 subtype B. We collected a total of<br />
4736 gene sequences from individual subregions, derived from 455 clinical samples<br />
(usually PBMC or plasma) from 144 subjects. Sequences were aligned using ClustalW,<br />
translated into amino acid sequences and manually edited to identify the V1V2, C2, V3,<br />
C3, V4, C4 and V5 regions. Subregion lengths were calculated, and potential N-linked<br />
glycosylation sites were counted using N-glycosite. Data were analyzed treating each<br />
sequence individually, and repeated as a weighted average of all sequences contributed<br />
by a given individual. In cross-sectional analyses, loop length variation was examined as<br />
a function of time since infection, CD4 count, viral load, and calendar year. In longitudinal<br />
analyses, loop lengths were examined as a function of time between sampling. We also<br />
examined loop-length variation during transmission to a new host. Results V1V2 displayed<br />
the most length variation of any region examined. In cross-sectional analyses, a<br />
significant positive correlation was observed between V1V2 length increase and time<br />
since infection (p < 0.05), and calendar year (p < 0.05). A weak inverse relationship was<br />
noted between V1V2 length and CD4 count. However, no relationship was seen with viral<br />
load, or whether sequences were obtained from plasma or PBMC. In longitudinal<br />
analyses, V1V2 loop length was generally seen to increase over time in subjects with<br />
chronic HIV infection (not AIDS). However, in subjects with advanced disease (CD4 count<br />
< 200), V1V2 loop length decreased over time. Transmission between hosts was usually<br />
but not always associated with an initial decline in V1V2 loop length. V5 was the next most<br />
variable region, but did not change in any consistent way in relationship to the parameters<br />
examined. Changes in the number of glycosylation sites generally paralleled length<br />
variation. Discussion Structural studies indicate that the V1V2 region shields V3 prior to<br />
CD4 binding, and is intimately involved in conformational changes allowing coreceptor<br />
binding site exposure, and coreceptor binding. Viruses lacking V1 and V2 replicate<br />
efficiently in vitro, but are highly sensitive to neutralizing antibodies. Therefore, the<br />
principal role of the V1V2 region may be to permit evasion from humoral immune<br />
responses in the host. Our observations are consistent with the hypothesis that HIV<br />
adapts to humoral selective pressure within the immunocompetent host by increasing the<br />
size of V1V2, either by lengthening of the V1V2 amino-acid chain, and/or by adding<br />
carbohydrate moieties at N-linked glycosylation sites. The significance of the apparent<br />
increase in V1V2 length by calendar year is unclear but may be related to sampling bias.<br />
HIV-1 V1V2 loop length may be an indirect clinical indicator of humoral immune<br />
competence. Vaccines eliciting humoral immunity to HIV may provide greater protection<br />
from donors with early infection and shorter V1V2 loop lengths than from donors with<br />
chronic disease and longer V1V2 length variants.<br />
“ Focusing FIRST on PEOPLE “ 252 w w w . i s h e i d . c o m