23.10.2014 Views

Analysis - The Institute for Southern Studies

Analysis - The Institute for Southern Studies

Analysis - The Institute for Southern Studies

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Step 6. Monetize Future Avoided Cancer Risk Benefits<br />

Reflecting the best science available, EPA used a point estimate of cancer cases avoided to monetize cancer risks. Appendix K4 provides<br />

further explanation as to why the NRC science is considered more appropriate than the older skin cancer research that the current IRIS value<br />

was derived from. Because EPA has greater confidence in the NRC estimates, it chose to use the 2,509 cancers calculated above as the best<br />

estimate. EPA also used the NRC ratio of 23 male bladder cancers to 14 male lung cancers to estimate how many of each type were likely to<br />

occur in each year. That is, 62%, or 1,556 cancers, are assumed to be bladder cancers and 38% or 953 are assumed to be lung cancers.<br />

Appendix K7 shows the best estimate number of lung and bladder cancers in each year that was used in the remaining portions of this analysis.<br />

Since cancers are not all fatal, the next step was to estimate the number of cancers that are fatal and non-fatal. This was done separately <strong>for</strong><br />

each type of cancer using 5-year survival rates from the EPA-ORCR 2009 CCR risk report. <strong>The</strong> 5-year survival rate used <strong>for</strong> bladder cancer is<br />

82% and the 5-year survival rate used <strong>for</strong> lung cancer is 14%. Thus, 1,276 (82%) of bladder cancers are non-fatal and 280 (18%) are fatal. For<br />

lung cancer, 133 (14%) are non-fatal and 820 (86%) are fatal. Again, these cancers are spread over the 75 years of the analysis. In order to<br />

monetize avoided cancer risks, this RIA applied the value of a statistical life (VSL) plus the cost of terminal cancer treatments displayed in<br />

Exhibit 5A-8 below. To monetize avoided non-fatal cancer risks, this RIA used an estimate from Magat et al. (1996). 123 This study shows that<br />

a typical individual’s assessment of a non-fatal lymphoma risk reduction was the equivalent of 58.3% of a fatal lymphoma risk reduction. 124<br />

<strong>The</strong>re<strong>for</strong>e, this RIA assumed individuals value non-fatal bladder and lung cancer risk reduction in a similar manner.<br />

Exhibit 5A-8<br />

Unitized Monetary Values <strong>for</strong> Human Cancer Risks Applied in this RIA<br />

Monetized Value 2008$<br />

Fatal cancers: value of statistical life (VSL)* $8,800,000<br />

Non-fatal cancers: 58.3% of VSL* $5,130,400<br />

Medical costs associated with fatal bladder cancer** $149,863<br />

Medical costs associated with fatal lung cancer** $87,703<br />

Notes:<br />

*Median VSL of $4.65 million (1997$) from Exhibit 7-3 (page 89) of EPA “Guidelines <strong>for</strong> Preparing Economic Analyses,” EPA 240-<br />

R-00-003, Sept 2000; converted <strong>for</strong> this RIA to 2008 dollars using the Consumer Price Index. In addition, projections of benefits in<br />

future years are subject to income elasticity adjustments. <strong>The</strong>se represent changes in valuation in relation to changes in real income.<br />

For example, if, <strong>for</strong> every 1% increase in real income, a particular consumer’s willingness-to-pay <strong>for</strong> a particular item increases by 1%,<br />

this would be represented by an income elasticity of 1.0. For most items, income elasticity values are actually less than 1, indicating<br />

that valuation of most items does not increase as fast as real income levels. To do so, applied the change in Gross Domestic Product<br />

per-capita between the original dollar year of the estimates and 2008, and an income elasticity of 0.5 based on estimates from Viscusi,<br />

W. K. and Aldy, J. E. “<strong>The</strong> Value of a Statistical Life: A Critical Review of Market Estimates throughout the World,” Journal of Risk<br />

and Uncertainty, Vol.27, 2003, pp. 15–76.<br />

** <strong>The</strong>se costs reflect the inpatient hospital stays, skilled nursing facility stays, home health agency charges, physicians' services, and<br />

outpatient and other medical services - in other words the treatment and maintenance costs. Costs are assumed to occur during initial<br />

123 Magat, Wesley A., V. Kip Viscusi and Joel Huber "A Reference Lottery Metric <strong>for</strong> Valuing Health," Management Science, Vol.42, Issue 8, 1996, pp.1118 - 1130.<br />

124 EPA acknowledges that alternative approaches to valuing non-fatal cancers are available. One such alternative is presented in Appendix K5 of this RIA.<br />

121

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!