23.10.2014 Views

Analysis - The Institute for Southern Studies

Analysis - The Institute for Southern Studies

Analysis - The Institute for Southern Studies

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

In comparison to these baseline “raw materials acquisition cost” elements, CCR disposal costs are estimated to be $83/ton <strong>for</strong> the Subtitle C<br />

option (source: Exhibit 4K). While this represents a 44% increase ($26/ton) over the baseline disposal cost of $59/ton, this ignores the CCR<br />

price and the transportation cost elements. Factoring these components in, the $26/ton increase represents a 28% increase above the total<br />

baseline raw material cost of $94.50/ton. This RIA applies this 28% growth factor to represent demand elasticity 153 assumptions of:<br />

+0.64 with respect to the CCR “avoided disposal cost incentive” factor (i.e., +28%/+44%).<br />

+1.00 with respect to total “raw material acquisition cost” consisting of all three cost factors included (i.e., +28%/+28%).<br />

This RIA applies the elasticity estimate of 1.0 in reference to the “raw material acquisition cost” to represent the potential increase in CCR<br />

beneficial use by 28% over the baseline under the Subtitle C option. <strong>The</strong> other regulatory options are proportionately adjusted below. In<br />

comparison to historical annual percentage changes in CCR beneficial use tonnages, this 28% increase is a reasonable assumption as it falls<br />

between the -22.6% decrease and +55.2% increase min-max range (annual mean = +8.2% increase) over the 43 year period 1966 to 2008, 154 as<br />

displayed in Exhibit 5C-14 below.<br />

Exhibit 5C-14<br />

Historical Annual Percentage Change in CCR Beneficial Use (1966-2008)<br />

A B C D E F (E/C) G<br />

Item Year<br />

CCR generation<br />

(tons)<br />

CCR disposal<br />

(tons)<br />

CCR beneficial<br />

use (tons)<br />

Percent CCR<br />

beneficial use<br />

1 1966 26,000,000 22,000,000 4,000,000 15%<br />

2 1967 28,000,000 23,000,000 5,000,000 18% 25.0%<br />

3 1968 30,000,000 24,000,000 6,000,000 20% 20.0%<br />

4 1969 31,500,000 26,000,000 5,500,000 17% -8.3%<br />

5 1970 39,000,000 33,200,000 5,800,000 15% 5.5%<br />

6 1971 41,500,000 32,500,000 9,000,000 22% 55.2%<br />

7 1972 46,000,000 38,000,000 8,000,000 17% -11.1%<br />

8 1973 50,000,000 41,500,000 8,500,000 17% 6.3%<br />

9 1974 59,000,000 50,000,000 9,000,000 15% 5.9%<br />

10 1975 60,000,000 50,000,000 10,000,000 17% 11.1%<br />

11 1976 62,000,000 50,000,000 12,000,000 19% 20.0%<br />

12 1977 67,000,000 53,000,000 14,000,000 21% 16.7%<br />

13 1978 68,000,000 52,000,000 16,000,000 24% 14.3%<br />

14 1979 75,500,000 60,000,000 15,500,000 21% -3.1%<br />

15 1980 66,000,000 54,000,000 12,000,000 18% -22.6%<br />

16 1981 68,000,000 51,500,000 16,500,000 24% 37.5%<br />

Annual % change in<br />

CCR beneficial use tons<br />

153 In economics, the elasticity of supply indicates the responsiveness of the quantity of a product or service supplied to the market relative to a change in its price (i.e., (%<br />

change in quantity supplied) / (% change in its price)). Similarly, the elasticity of demand indicates the responsiveness of the quantity of market demand <strong>for</strong> a product or<br />

service relative to a change in its price (i.e., (% change in quantity demanded) / (% change in its price)).<br />

154 Historical CCR beneficial use data <strong>for</strong> 1966-2008 from ACAA at http://www.acaa-usa.org/associations/8003/files/Revised_1966_2007_CCP_Prod_v_Use_Chart.pdf<br />

172

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!