23.10.2014 Views

Analysis - The Institute for Southern Studies

Analysis - The Institute for Southern Studies

Analysis - The Institute for Southern Studies

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Exhibit 5A-10<br />

Present Value of Avoided Human Cancer Risks Associated with CCR Disposal<br />

($millions present value over 50-years)<br />

Discount rate Subtitle C Subtitle D Subtitle D’<br />

@ 3% $1,825 $750 $375<br />

@ 7% $504 $207 $104<br />

<strong>The</strong> other major cost associated with groundwater contamination is that of remediation or other response. To estimate that cost, EPA began by<br />

estimating the number of coal-fired electric utility plants that would require responses under various state environmental programs, based on<br />

the 2009 risk assessment. In any particular situation, a state could require remediation of a site involving potential drinking water to 10 -4 , 10 -5 ,<br />

or 10 -6 levels. In addition, states may choose to require groundwater remediation <strong>for</strong> groundwater that is not a likely drinking water source,<br />

because of ecological concerns. Exhibit 5A-11 below shows the number of facilities potentially requiring cleanup. Since each estimate is<br />

equally acceptable under current state programs, the average is believed to be a best estimate <strong>for</strong> how many electric utility plants will ultimately<br />

need groundwater remediation so as not to overestimate the number of remediation events.<br />

State<br />

Cleanup<br />

Levels<br />

Exhibit 5A-11<br />

Proportion of CCR Sites Requiring Remediation Based on State Cleanup Levels<br />

Clean All Groundwater<br />

Clean Only Drinkable Groundwater<br />

10 -4 10 -5 10 -6 10 -4 10 -5 10 -6 Average<br />

Total LF 22 50 72 7 16 24 32<br />

Total SI 93 132 150 31 44 50 83<br />

<strong>The</strong>se plant counts are based on the probabilistic model iterations from the 2009 risk assessment which were used to estimate what fraction of<br />

sites would leach at above various clean up levels. Typically, solid waste cleanups can be conducted at either 10 -4 , 10 -5 , or 10 -6 individual<br />

cancer risk levels. Exhibit 5A-12 uses the PERCENTRANK function in Excel to estimate what percent of risk results fall at or below each<br />

clean up level. For example, in the first cell of Exhibit 5A-12, the 78% means that 10 -4 is higher than 78% of the probabilistic results <strong>for</strong><br />

unlined landfills with conventional ash.<br />

UL = Unlined<br />

CL = Clay-Lined<br />

A = Conventionally Managed Ash<br />

C = Co-managed Ash<br />

LF = Landfill<br />

SI = Surface Impoundment<br />

126

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!