Analysis - The Institute for Southern Studies
Analysis - The Institute for Southern Studies
Analysis - The Institute for Southern Studies
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Exhibit 5A-10<br />
Present Value of Avoided Human Cancer Risks Associated with CCR Disposal<br />
($millions present value over 50-years)<br />
Discount rate Subtitle C Subtitle D Subtitle D’<br />
@ 3% $1,825 $750 $375<br />
@ 7% $504 $207 $104<br />
<strong>The</strong> other major cost associated with groundwater contamination is that of remediation or other response. To estimate that cost, EPA began by<br />
estimating the number of coal-fired electric utility plants that would require responses under various state environmental programs, based on<br />
the 2009 risk assessment. In any particular situation, a state could require remediation of a site involving potential drinking water to 10 -4 , 10 -5 ,<br />
or 10 -6 levels. In addition, states may choose to require groundwater remediation <strong>for</strong> groundwater that is not a likely drinking water source,<br />
because of ecological concerns. Exhibit 5A-11 below shows the number of facilities potentially requiring cleanup. Since each estimate is<br />
equally acceptable under current state programs, the average is believed to be a best estimate <strong>for</strong> how many electric utility plants will ultimately<br />
need groundwater remediation so as not to overestimate the number of remediation events.<br />
State<br />
Cleanup<br />
Levels<br />
Exhibit 5A-11<br />
Proportion of CCR Sites Requiring Remediation Based on State Cleanup Levels<br />
Clean All Groundwater<br />
Clean Only Drinkable Groundwater<br />
10 -4 10 -5 10 -6 10 -4 10 -5 10 -6 Average<br />
Total LF 22 50 72 7 16 24 32<br />
Total SI 93 132 150 31 44 50 83<br />
<strong>The</strong>se plant counts are based on the probabilistic model iterations from the 2009 risk assessment which were used to estimate what fraction of<br />
sites would leach at above various clean up levels. Typically, solid waste cleanups can be conducted at either 10 -4 , 10 -5 , or 10 -6 individual<br />
cancer risk levels. Exhibit 5A-12 uses the PERCENTRANK function in Excel to estimate what percent of risk results fall at or below each<br />
clean up level. For example, in the first cell of Exhibit 5A-12, the 78% means that 10 -4 is higher than 78% of the probabilistic results <strong>for</strong><br />
unlined landfills with conventional ash.<br />
UL = Unlined<br />
CL = Clay-Lined<br />
A = Conventionally Managed Ash<br />
C = Co-managed Ash<br />
LF = Landfill<br />
SI = Surface Impoundment<br />
126