Analysis - The Institute for Southern Studies
Analysis - The Institute for Southern Studies
Analysis - The Institute for Southern Studies
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
costs <strong>for</strong> each type of disposal (note: the sum of plant counts <strong>for</strong> each disposal category below exceeds 467 because some plants use more than<br />
one type of CCR disposal method):<br />
o 311 plants with active onsite CCR landfills<br />
o 158 plants with active onsite CCR surface impoundments<br />
o 149 plants which offsite dispose (assumed all involve offsite landfills)<br />
For this RIA, the “baseline” is defined as existing conditions plus projection of future conditions over the 50-year future period-of-analysis<br />
2012 to 2061 applied in this RIA (this RIA assumes year 2012 represents the first year when the final rule could take effect, if promulgated).<br />
Baseline engineering controls were estimated using the following 2-step method which is based on two alternative and complementary sources<br />
of in<strong>for</strong>mation:<br />
Step 1: If the plant reported controls in the 1995 EPRI Comanagement Survey, 1996 CIBO Survey, or the 1994-2004 DOE-EPA Study,<br />
the stricter of these controls or state-specified controls are assumed <strong>for</strong> the baseline. <strong>The</strong>se studies contained control data <strong>for</strong> 89 plants with<br />
CCR landfills and 50 plants with CCR impoundments (i.e., 139 of the 495 electric utility plants). State regulations added additional<br />
controls at 69 of the 89 landfill plants and 43 of the 50 impoundment plants with plant specific in<strong>for</strong>mation (e.g., the EPRI Survey data may<br />
have indicated that the unit had a liner only but state regulations required groundwater monitoring and capping so these additional controls<br />
were added).<br />
Step 2: Controls specified under state regulations <strong>for</strong> 34 states are assumed <strong>for</strong> all other plants in those 34 states <strong>for</strong> the baseline if no<br />
1995 EPRI Comanagement Survey data, 1996 CIBO Survey data, or 1994-2004 DOE-EPA Study data are available <strong>for</strong> that plant. This<br />
step resulted in assigning state-required controls to 201 plants with CCR landfills and 55 plants with CCR impoundments (i.e., 256 of the<br />
495 plants). Overall state regulations were added to 270 plants with CCR landfills and 98 plants with CCR impoundments.<br />
For the 100 plants (i.e., 47 plants with landfills and 53 plants with impoundments) <strong>for</strong> which there are no data from the three<br />
studies, and no state-regulatory data on controls from Step 1, no controls are assumed under baseline <strong>for</strong> on-site landfills and<br />
impoundments; this represents a worst case (i.e., high cost) assumption.<br />
<strong>The</strong> associated data sources and findings <strong>for</strong> each baseline characterization step are described below.<br />
Step 1: Baseline Installed CCR Disposal Engineering Controls Identified in Prior Industry Surveys (1995, 1996, 2004)<br />
<strong>The</strong> controls identified through the Step 1 prior studies were more stringent than the state government requirements discussed in Step 2 <strong>for</strong>:<br />
o Landfills: Voluntary controls <strong>for</strong> 25 plants with landfills (9% of 227 plants landfills) receiving 6.4 million tons per year (i.e.,<br />
9% of total landfill CCR quantity) in 12 states (some are identified as voluntary because state regulations were not reviewed <strong>for</strong><br />
the state): AR, AZ, CA, IA, IN, KS, MD, MN, NE, SD, SI, WV.<br />
43