Analysis - The Institute for Southern Studies
Analysis - The Institute for Southern Studies
Analysis - The Institute for Southern Studies
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Be<strong>for</strong>e-tax costs:<br />
50-year period:<br />
7% discount rate:<br />
0.73% growth:<br />
Beneficial use:<br />
Offsite disposal:<br />
Baseline disposal costs estimated on a be<strong>for</strong>e-tax basis to approximate the overall economic cost (i.e., real resource<br />
allocation <strong>for</strong> the economy as a whole, rather than on an after-tax basis which would approximate a relatively narrower<br />
financial cost to the electric utility industry because after-tax costs subtract business expense tax deductions and<br />
depreciation of capital expenditures <strong>for</strong> pollution control equipment.<br />
A 50-year future time horizon (aka period-of-analysis) was applied because new construction <strong>for</strong> replacement of all<br />
CCR disposal units and end of existing lifespan is estimated to have occurred at least once by that time.<br />
A 7% discount rate was applied <strong>for</strong> calculating both net present value cost and average annualized cost <strong>for</strong> the<br />
engineering control unit costs applied in this RIA. Because both the annualized baseline cost and annualized<br />
incremental proposed rule costs estimated in this RIA consist of primarily (i.e., >95%) industry cost rather than<br />
government cost, this RIA applies a 7% discount rate rather than a lower (e.g., 3%, 2%, 1% or 0%) discount rate to<br />
represent the opportunity cost of business capital investment and business expense financing (i.e., the average rate of<br />
return to corporate capital). This is consistent with OMB’s 2003 Circular A-4 47 (page 33) and 1992 Circular A-94 48<br />
(page 8) which indicate that a 7% discount rate base-case should be used <strong>for</strong> regulatory analyses when regulation is<br />
expected to primarily and directly affect businesses and industries.<br />
Baseline cost estimates increased 0.73% per year over the 50-year future time horizon to reflect a 0.73% annual<br />
growth in coal consumption at electric utility plants (which is a proxy <strong>for</strong> future annual growth in the annual tonnage of<br />
CCR generation needing disposal from those plants). <strong>The</strong> 0.73% annual growth factor is based on DOE-EIA's January<br />
2009 "Annual Energy Outlook 2009" <strong>for</strong>ecast change in US coal consumption <strong>for</strong> electricity generation between year<br />
2010 (22.91 quadrillion Btus) and 2030 (26.41 quadrillion Btus), available at:<br />
http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/aeo/index.html<br />
If reported in the baseline by any particular plant, beneficial use was assumed to continue in the future by that plant<br />
under the baseline projection over the 50-year future period-of-analysis. Section 5C in Chapter 5 of this RIA<br />
evaluates potential changes to this beneficial use baseline under alternative regulatory impact scenarios.<br />
If reported in baseline by any particular plant, offsite disposal was assumed to continue in the future by that plant.<br />
Offsite disposal landfill cost estimated under both baseline and regulatory options using the engineering control cost<br />
model. Truck operating cost estimated separately outside of the model.<br />
Existing unit closure: One set of years <strong>for</strong> the opening and closure of disposal units are assumed <strong>for</strong> each facility. If data <strong>for</strong> initial year of<br />
operation were provided in the 1995 EPRI Comanagement Survey, these data were used. If the plant had more than<br />
47 2003 OMB Circular A-4: http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/circulars_a004_a-4/<br />
48 1992 OMB Circular A-94: http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/circulars_a094/<br />
53