23.10.2014 Views

Analysis - The Institute for Southern Studies

Analysis - The Institute for Southern Studies

Analysis - The Institute for Southern Studies

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Step 3. Calculate Future Impoundment Failure Avoided Cleanup Cost Benefits<br />

After fitting a distribution of the number of releases likely to occur, EPA proceeded to combine these with the cost data presented in Step 1<br />

above. This was done <strong>for</strong> the average case and three high-end cases (90 th , 95 th , and 99 th percentiles). For each case, the number of expected<br />

releases seen in Exhibit 5B-4 below was divided by 50 to get the expected number of releases per year. <strong>The</strong>se events were then multiplied by<br />

their respective costs, and the catastrophic and significant release values were summed in each year.<br />

Exhibit 5B-4<br />

Projected Future CCR Impoundment Releases<br />

Based on 15-Year (1995-2009) Period of Historical CCR Impoundment Structural Failure Cases<br />

Type of CCR<br />

Expected Number of Release Events<br />

Assigned Cost<br />

Impoundment Release 99 th %-ile 95 th %-ile 90 th %-ile Average Per Failure Event<br />

Catastrophic 8 7 6 3 $3.0 billion*<br />

Significant 27 24 22 17 $23.1 million<br />

* Note: $3.0 billion is EPA’s initial “social cost” estimate assigned in this RIA to the December 2008 TVA Kingston<br />

TN impoundment release event. Social cost represents the opportunity costs incurred by society, not just the monetary<br />

costs <strong>for</strong> cleanup. OMB's 2003 "Circular A-4: Regulatory <strong>Analysis</strong>" (page 18) instructs Federal agencies to estimate<br />

"opportunity costs" <strong>for</strong> purpose of valuing benefits and costs in RIAs. This $3.0 billion social cost estimate is larger<br />

than TVA’s $933 million to $1.2 billion cleanup cost estimate (i.e., TVA’s estimate as of 03 Feb 2010), because<br />

EPA’s social cost estimate consists of three other social cost elements in addition to TVA’s cleanup cost estimate: (a)<br />

TVA cleanup cost, (b) response, oversight and ancillary costs associated with local, state, and other Federal agencies,<br />

(c) ecological damages, and (d) local (community) socio-economic damages. Appendix Q to this RIA provides<br />

EPA's documentation and calculation of these four cost elements, which total $3.0 billion in social cost. Appendix Q<br />

to this RIA also provides an alternative, lower estimate of social costs, based on different modeling assumptions <strong>for</strong><br />

capturing such costs. This alternative analysis suggests that TVA’s cleanup costs alone may be close to the social costs<br />

associated with the Kingston impoundment failure. EPA specifically requests comment on this social cost estimate,<br />

and will continue to develop this estimate <strong>for</strong> the final rule.<br />

However, EIA data indicate that there is a current trend among coal-fired power plants to switch from wet handling to dry handling. As seen<br />

below in Exhibit 5B-5, this will lead to a decrease of approximately 300,000 tons being disposed of in surface impoundments per year, or<br />

approximately 1.3% of the initial 22.5 million tons in 2005. Since the tons disposed of (and similarly, the number of surface impoundments)<br />

likely relate to the number of releases, these decreases are accounted <strong>for</strong> by using 2005 wet tonnage as a benchmark and assuming the quantity<br />

of wet tonnage declines 300,000 tons per year. <strong>The</strong> cost <strong>for</strong> each year is multiplied by the remaining percent still handled wet.<br />

139

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!