23.10.2014 Views

Analysis - The Institute for Southern Studies

Analysis - The Institute for Southern Studies

Analysis - The Institute for Southern Studies

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

o Impoundment berms: <strong>The</strong> average surface impoundment size <strong>for</strong> existing units in the cost model is 343 acres. Assuming a<br />

square impoundment and that the berm would be constructed on three sides of the impoundment the average berm length is 11,594<br />

feet. <strong>The</strong>re<strong>for</strong>e, the cost to construct a berm around an average-size impoundment is $4.3 million. 64<br />

o Landfill berms: Similarly, the average landfill size <strong>for</strong> existing units in the cost model is 278 acres. Assuming a square landfill<br />

and that the berm would be constructed on three sides of the landfill (leaving one side open <strong>for</strong> truck access), the average berm<br />

length is 10,447 feet, and the cost to construct a berm surrounding an average-size landfill is $3.9 million.<br />

Using the 3-mile buffer karst zone finding of 177 plants, the potential cost <strong>for</strong> constructing berms at those plants plus future plants is:<br />

o Existing units: ($4.1 million average berm cost) x (177 disposal units) = $726 million total cost<br />

Amortized with a capital recovery factor of 0.07246 (@7% discount rate & 50-years) = $53 million/year equivalent<br />

o New units: Apply 0.73% average annual growth rate in future CCR generation (cited elsewhere in this RIA) to estimate the count<br />

of future new or expanded disposal units over 50-years, and assume 36% (i.e., 177/495) will need berms:<br />

(495 existing disposal units) x (1.0073% growth rate)^(50 years) = 712 existing plus new units over 50-years<br />

(712 units over 50-years) – (495 existing units) = 217 future new disposal units<br />

(217 future new units) x (36% needing berms) x ($4.1 million average berm cost) = $318 million total cost<br />

Amortized with a capital recovery factor of 0.07246 (@7% discount rate & 50-years) = $23 million/year equivalent<br />

Average annualized berm cost <strong>for</strong> existing + new units = $76 million/year equivalent<br />

8. Regulatory closure cost<br />

Same cost estimation <strong>for</strong>mula applied above in Chapter 3 <strong>for</strong> baseline cost estimation.<br />

9. Regulatory post-closure monitoring cost<br />

Same cost estimation <strong>for</strong>mula applied above in Chapter 3 <strong>for</strong> baseline cost estimation.<br />

10. Storage design and operating standards <strong>for</strong> tanks, containers, and containment buildings<br />

Not estimated in this RIA due to lack of baseline in<strong>for</strong>mation about the count and condition of these units at electric utility plants<br />

4B.2 Ancillary Regulatory Requirement Costs<br />

For estimating most of the “Other Ancillary Costs” in this section, this RIA distinguishes between RCRA Subtitle C and RCRA Subtitle D<br />

requirements according to the respective basis of each regulatory option, as well as between costs to electric utility plants and costs to state<br />

government RCRA-authorized regulatory programs.<br />

64 For purpose of comparison to the $4.3 million (per impoundment) and $3.9 million (per landfill) location restriction mitigation cost estimates above, in 2005 the TVA<br />

estimated an “assumed” cost of $500,000 <strong>for</strong> karst mitigation and $250,000 <strong>for</strong> floodplain mitigation <strong>for</strong> a potential new CCR disposal site involving 1,300 linear feet <strong>for</strong><br />

mitigation. Extrapolation of TVA’s $750,000 cost estimate to 11,594 feet (impoundment) yields $6.7 million (i.e., (11,594 feet / 1,300 feet) x ($750,000)), and to 10,447<br />

feet (landfill) yields $6.0 million (i.e., 10,447 feet / 1,300 feet) x ($750,000)). Source <strong>for</strong> TVA cost estimate: page 10 of “Kingston Fossil Plant Decision Matrix: Pond or<br />

Peninsula?”, 27 January 2005 Plant Managers Conference, http://www.tva.gov/kingston/tdec/pdf/TVA-00007487.pdf<br />

73

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!