Analysis - The Institute for Southern Studies
Analysis - The Institute for Southern Studies
Analysis - The Institute for Southern Studies
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Exhibit 5B-12<br />
Scenario #2: Cleanup Cost Estimates <strong>for</strong> CCR Impoundment Catastrophic Failures @ 10% Failures<br />
% of Tons<br />
Costs @3% Costs @7% % of Tons Costs @3% Costs @7%<br />
Year<br />
Baseline<br />
(in millions) (in millions) Subtitle C (in millions) (in millions)<br />
88.2% 2014 - - 88.2% - -<br />
86.9% 2015 $1,146 $1,022 70.6% $930 $830<br />
85.6% 2016 $1,095 $941 52.9% $677 $582<br />
84.3% 2017 $1,047 $866 35.3% $438 $362<br />
83.0% 2018 $1,001 $797 17.6% $213 $169<br />
81.7% 2019 $956 $733 0.0% $0 $0<br />
80.4% 2020 $914 $674<br />
79.1% 2021 $873 $619<br />
77.8% 2022 $833 $569<br />
76.5% 2023 $796 $523<br />
75.2% 2024 $759 $481<br />
73.9% 2025 $724 $441<br />
72.6% 2026 $691 $405<br />
71.2% 2027 $659 $372<br />
69.9% 2028 $628 $341<br />
68.6% 2029 $598 $313<br />
67.3% 2030 $569 $287<br />
66.0% 2031 $542 $263<br />
64.7% 2032 $516 $241<br />
63.4% 2033 $491 $221<br />
62.1% 2034 $467 $202<br />
Baseline Total $15,305 $10,309 C Total $2,259 $1,943<br />
Given the costs above, the total benefits of a Subtitle C phase out over 5 years would be the difference between the potential catastrophic<br />
failure costs under C and the catastrophic failure costs under the baseline. For the 20% “Scenario #3”, this figure is double, as displayed below<br />
in Exhibit 5B-13. For Subtitle D, it is assumed that the 48% of states (by tonnage, as described in Appendix K9) that have at least some<br />
regulatory oversight currently, would en<strong>for</strong>ce the retrofitting requirement. However, since 5.5% of impoundments already have composite<br />
liners, these units would not be expected to close. Thus 94.5% times 48% leads to an approximately 45% of the Subtitle C benefits. For<br />
Subtitle D prime, the requirement of dam safety inspections would be likely to result in some amount catastrophic failure reduction between the<br />
baseline and the Subtitle D approach. This RIA uses the midpoint, a 23% reduction, as a best estimate. While these estimates are likely much<br />
higher than the actual benefits from preventing catastrophic failures, they do help to define the upper bound of what is possible under current<br />
practices of mismanagement.<br />
147