Analysis - The Institute for Southern Studies
Analysis - The Institute for Southern Studies
Analysis - The Institute for Southern Studies
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
ES-2: Benefits of Avoided Future Groundwater Contamination (Human Health & Avoided Remediation Costs)<br />
By establishing management and permit standards <strong>for</strong> CCR disposal units under RCRA, the proposed regulatory options will reduce<br />
uncontrolled releases and cancer risks, and improve detection and, if necessary, response to future groundwater contamination. This RIA<br />
quantifies two components of groundwater protection benefits: (a) human cancer risks avoided from drinking contaminated groundwater, and<br />
(b) groundwater contamination remediation costs avoided. Summary Exhibit 1 below presents the monetized results of this evaluation.<br />
<br />
<br />
Estimate of avoided human cancer risks from avoided future groundwater contamination by CCR disposal units:<br />
o Individual skin cancer risks avoided (by eliminating the groundwater pathway <strong>for</strong> arsenic at CCR impoundments) are estimated<br />
up to 2 x 10 -2 (i.e., a probability equal to 2 individual human skin cancer incidence risks <strong>for</strong> every 100 persons exposed) using<br />
the current IRIS skin cancer slope factor <strong>for</strong> arsenic.<br />
o 30,400 people use drinking water wells within one mile of coal-fired electric utility plants; of which 8,150 (27%) are children.<br />
o Taking into account current CCR disposal unit designs, an estimated 145 (using the IRIS cancer slope factor) to 2,509 (using the<br />
NRC lung and bladder cancer slope factor 1 ) future human cancer risks are expected to occur in absence of the proposed RCRA<br />
regulation, based on drinking water exposure to arsenic in CCR.<br />
Other human health risks from CCR disposal units not quantified in this RIA:<br />
o Human non-cancer risks, including from selenium, cobalt, nitrate/nitrite, and molybdenum, which may be released to<br />
groundwater at levels above the MCL or 3 times the human hazard quotient (HQ).<br />
o Cancer and non-cancer risks from arsenic and other metals released in effluent from CCR impoundments to surface waters.<br />
Summary Exhibit 1<br />
Future Avoided Human Cancer Risks & Avoided Groundwater Remediation Cost Benefits<br />
($millions present value @7% discount rate over 50-years)<br />
Groundwater Protection Benefit Category<br />
Subtitle C Subtitle D<br />
special waste (version 2)<br />
Subtitle “D prime”<br />
Groundwater Remediation Costs Avoided $466 $168 $84<br />
Monetized Value of Cancer Risks Avoided $504 $207 $104<br />
Total = $970 $375 $188<br />
ES-3: Benefits of Avoided Future CCR Impoundment Structural Failures (Avoided Cleanup Costs)<br />
This RIA estimated future avoided cleanup costs from catastrophic impoundment failures, like the one that occurred at TVA’s Kingston TN<br />
coal-fired electricity plant in December 2008, which would be prevented under the proposed rule. Given the increasing age of CCR<br />
1 EPA calculated a new cancer slope factor <strong>for</strong> arsenic from data in the National Research Council report “Arsenic in Drinking Water: 2001 Update” at<br />
http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?isbn=0309076293<br />
6