23.10.2014 Views

Analysis - The Institute for Southern Studies

Analysis - The Institute for Southern Studies

Analysis - The Institute for Southern Studies

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Benefit category<br />

Exhibit 5C-5<br />

Estimate of Annual Baseline Lifecycle Benefits from CCR Beneficial Use<br />

(Based on 2005 CCR beneficial use tonnage)<br />

Physical quantity of environmental benefits <strong>for</strong><br />

Unit monetization<br />

Estimated benefits<br />

($millions per year)<br />

48.5 million tons annual CCR beneficial use w/out mining application* values (2009$)**<br />

6. SOx – sulfur oxides 23,900 metric tons emissions avoided $62,375 per metric ton $1,491<br />

7. PM – particulate matter 9,704 metric tons emissions avoided $486,312 per metric ton $4,719<br />

8. Particles non-specified 26,200 metric tons emissions avoided $486,312 per metric ton $12,741<br />

9. Hg - mercury 0.584 metric tons emissions avoided Not estimated Not estimated<br />

10. Pb - lead 0.656 metric tons emissions avoided Not estimated Not estimated<br />

Subtotal (3 to 10) = $19,502<br />

Subtotal air pollution savings excluding SOx & excluding mine-filling use = $18,011<br />

C. Other Environmental Savings<br />

11. Waterborne wastes<br />

2,446 short tons waste generation avoided<br />

(SM + BOD + COD + Cu + Hg + Pb + Se)<br />

Not estimated<br />

Not estimated<br />

12. Solid waste 27,991 short tons waste generation avoided Not estimated Not estimated<br />

Total (1 to 12) = $24,471<br />

Total annual lifecycle benefits (excluding SOx & excluding mine-filling use) =<br />

$22,980<br />

($474/ton)<br />

Notes:<br />

* Physical quantity of environmental benefits are based on only two of the 14 beneficial use industrial applications (i.e., 15.0 million tons per year fly ash CCR used in<br />

concrete, plus 8.2 million tons per year FGD CCR used in wallboard). <strong>The</strong>se estimates are from Exhibit 5-3 (page 5-6) of “Waste and Materials-Flow Benchmark<br />

Sector Report: Beneficial Use of Secondary Materials – Coal Combustion Products,” prepared by Industrial Economics Inc <strong>for</strong> the EPA Office of Solid Waste, 12 Feb<br />

2008; available at http://www.epa.gov/osw/partnerships/c2p2/pubs/benuse07.pdf. This 2008 reference report does not provide environmental impact estimates <strong>for</strong> the<br />

other 12 beneficial use industrial applications.<br />

** Unit monetary values applied <strong>for</strong> monetization are from the following sources:<br />

Row 1 & Row 2: 2007 values from Exhibit 5-3 (page 5-6) of the Industrial Economics Inc reference report. Unit values updated <strong>for</strong> this RIA from 2007 to 2009<br />

using NASA’s Gross Domestic Product Deflator Inflation Calculator at http://cost.jsc.nasa.gov/inflateGDP.html<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Row 3: Based on the September 2009 interim social cost of carbon (i.e., interim SCC) from Table III.H.6-3, page 29617 of the joint EPA and DOT-NHTSA<br />

“Proposed Rulemaking to Establish Light-Duty Vehicle Greenhouse Gas Emission Standards and Corporate Average Fuel Economy Standards,” Federal Register,<br />

Volume 74, No. 186, 28 Sept 2009. <strong>The</strong> value applied in this RIA is the $19.50 per ton median value from the $5 to $56 per ton range displayed in the 2007<br />

column in that source. Furthermore, this RIA updated the 2007$ median value from 2007 to 2009 dollars using the NASA Gross Domestic Product Deflator<br />

Inflation Calculator at http://cost.jsc.nasa.gov/inflateGDP.html. EPA is aware that final SCC values were published on March 9, 2010 in conjunction with a<br />

Department of Energy final rule. EPA intends to use the final SCC values <strong>for</strong> the CCR final rule RIA. <strong>The</strong> final SCC values are published in the Department of<br />

Energy, Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy Building Technologies Program, "Small Electric Motors Final Rule Technical Support Document: Chapter 16 -<br />

Regulatory Impact <strong>Analysis</strong>", March 9, 2010 at http://www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/appliance_standards/commercial/sem_finalrule_tsd.html).<br />

Rows 4-10: Unit values from the report “<strong>The</strong> Influence of Location, Source, and Emission Type in Estimates of the Human Health Benefits of Reducing a Ton of<br />

Air Pollution” by Neal Fann, Charles Fulcher and Bryan Hubbell, in Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health, Volume 2, No.3, Sept 2009, pages 169-176. <strong>The</strong> dollar<br />

values from this report were updated from 2006 to 2009 using NASA’s Gross Domestic Product Deflator Inflation Calculator at<br />

http://cost.jsc.nasa.gov/inflateGDP.html<br />

Rows 12-13: Waterborne waste and solid waste generation avoided benefits were not monetized in the 2008 Industrial Economics Inc. reference study cited above.<br />

156

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!