23.10.2014 Views

Analysis - The Institute for Southern Studies

Analysis - The Institute for Southern Studies

Analysis - The Institute for Southern Studies

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>for</strong>m a coherent organization and they must have enough funding to launch and maintain a lawsuit. On the other side of such litigation,<br />

households usually face a single firm often with greater legal funding resources. This imbalance suggests that external costs of leachate<br />

contamination from industrial waste disposal sites (such as CCR landfills and impoundments) may not be recuperated.<br />

<strong>The</strong> CCR proposed rule also addresses a second source of market failure – inadequate or asymmetric in<strong>for</strong>mation. Citizens residing near CCR<br />

disposal sites may be unaware of exposure to chemical contaminants contained in CCR leaching from disposal units. Thus, while nearby<br />

citizens may have the right to legal lawsuits to recuperate health and property damages, citizens may not be aware of the need to do so until<br />

health risks (and health costs) have already been incurred.<br />

A very recent example of negative externalities associated with structural failures is the ecological and socio-economic damages and costs<br />

associated with a large environmental disaster involving the collapse of a CCR impoundment in 2008. On 22 December 2008, over a billion<br />

gallons (i.e., 5.4 million cubic yards) of CCR was unintentional environmental released over 300 acres from the collapse of a Tennessee Valley<br />

Authority (TVA) coal-fired electric utility surface impoundment in Kingston TN. This event caused significant damage to 40 homes, the<br />

Emory River, a nearby recreational lake, community roadways, a gas pipeline, and a railroad. As indicated in Exhibit 5B-2 of this RIA, the<br />

estimated cleanup costs to the TVA --- not including social costs of ecological damages and community socio-economic damages --- are<br />

estimated at $933 million to $1.2 billion. This event attracted major citizen, national press, and Congressional interest in the subject of CCR<br />

management and the urgent need <strong>for</strong> prevention of such future environmental and community damages. In the wake of this disaster, during her<br />

14 January 2009 Senate confirmation hearing, EPA Administrator-designate Lisa P. Jackson, testified 11 :<br />

“I think that you’ve put your finger on a very important thing that EPA must do right away, which is to assess the hundreds<br />

of other sites that are out there. Many of them … are … up hill from schools or from areas where just the physical hazard<br />

of having this mountain of wet coal ash, if there’s a break, can endanger lives immediately. So I would think that EPA needs<br />

to first and <strong>for</strong>emost assess the current state of what’s out here and where there might be another horrible accident waiting<br />

to happen … EPA currently has and has in the past, assessed its regulatory options with respect to coal ash, and I think it’s<br />

time to re-ask those questions and re-look at the state of regulation of them from an EPA perspective.”<br />

According to a 23 January 2009 news report, 12 there was growing Congressional interest <strong>for</strong> either the EPA with its existing RCRA regulatory<br />

authorities, or the Congress with potential new legislation, to regulate CCR disposal units:<br />

“Several lawmakers have introduced, or announced plans to introduce, competing legislation to regulate CCR. For example,<br />

Senate Environment & Public Works Committee Chairwoman Barbara Boxer (D-CA) said she would introduce legislation<br />

compelling EPA to regulate CCR in the event the Obama EPA fails to act soon. "If we are not satisfied with action we may<br />

move legislatively," Boxer told EPA Administrator-designate Lisa Jackson at a January 14 [2009] confirmation hearing. "I<br />

don't want to get to that point because I think you have the authority to regulate this. It needs to be done."”<br />

11 Lisa Jackson’s 14 January 2009 Senate confirmation hearing testimony and webcast is available from the US Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works’<br />

website at: http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Hearings.Hearing&Hearing_ID=ae2c3342-802a-23ad-4788-d1962403eb76<br />

12 Source: Waste Business Journal, “EPA Vows to Act on Coal Waste,” 23 January 2009, http://www.wastebusinessjournal.com/news/wbj20090127B.htm<br />

16

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!