25.10.2014 Views

Beauheim 1987 - Waste Isolation Pilot Plant - U.S. Department of ...

Beauheim 1987 - Waste Isolation Pilot Plant - U.S. Department of ...

Beauheim 1987 - Waste Isolation Pilot Plant - U.S. Department of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

I<br />

,EQUILIBRATION<br />

BUILDUP<br />

Elapsed Time in hours<br />

Stan Date 08/05 87<br />

SIanTlme OOOOW<br />

Linear-Linear Sequence Plot<br />

H-16 DST 677-690iTAMAUIS.K CLAYSTONE<br />

Figure 5-83. H-1 6/Tamarisk Claystone Shut-In Test Linear-Linear Sequence Plot<br />

least-transmissive unit successfully tested in H-16,<br />

the unnamed lower member siltstone (2 x<br />

10-4 ftz/day; Table 5-2).<br />

5.2.4 Magenta Dolomite Member. The Magenta<br />

dolomite was tested in wells H-14 and H-16. The<br />

objectives <strong>of</strong> the Magenta testing were to obtain<br />

quantitative information on the hydraulic head and<br />

transmissivity <strong>of</strong> the unit.<br />

5.2.4.1 H-14. At H-14, the Magenta lies from<br />

423.8 to 447.5 ft deep (Figure 3-6). The Magenta was<br />

tested in a DST straddle interval from 420.0 to<br />

448.5 ft deep, which included 4.8 ft <strong>of</strong> overlying and<br />

underlying gypsum. This gypsum is not thought to<br />

have contributed significantly to the responses<br />

observed during testing. The Magenta was tested<br />

from October 10 to 13, 1986. Drillstem testing<br />

consisted <strong>of</strong> three flow periods and three buildup<br />

periods (Figure 5-84). Descriptions <strong>of</strong> the test<br />

instrumentation and the test data are contained in<br />

Stensrud et al. (<strong>1987</strong>).<br />

To obtain equivalent constant-rate flow periods, each<br />

<strong>of</strong> the three flow periods was subdivided into two<br />

shorter periods. The FFL, which lasted about 15<br />

minutes, was divided into two periods with flow rates<br />

<strong>of</strong> 0.049 and 0.014 gpm (Table 5-1). The SFL, which<br />

lasted about 30 minutes, was divided into two<br />

periods with flow rates <strong>of</strong> 0.036 and 0.010 gpm.<br />

Finally, the TFL, which lasted about 60 minutes, was<br />

divided into shorter periods with flow rates <strong>of</strong> 0.014<br />

and 0.007 gprn. The durations <strong>of</strong> the buildup periods<br />

were approximately 18.5, 23.5, and 21.1 hr for the<br />

FBU, SBU, and TBU, respectively.<br />

As can be seen first on the linear-linear sequence<br />

plot <strong>of</strong> the Magenta DST's (Figure 5-84), the<br />

presence <strong>of</strong> an overpressure skin had a significant<br />

effect on the observed buildup responses. When the<br />

Magenta interval was initially shut in for an<br />

equilibration period following swabbing, the fluid<br />

pressure rose to a peak <strong>of</strong> 134.2 psia and then<br />

gradually declined. Six hours into the FBU, the<br />

pressure peaked at 123.2 psia, and then declined for<br />

110

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!