Beauheim 1987 - Waste Isolation Pilot Plant - U.S. Department of ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

10' MATCH PARAMETERS O n w a 3 v) v) W K n v) W a 2 2 v) 2 W I - 0 100 AP = 1.0 psi t = 1.0 hr PO = 0.0875 to/C, -400 Coe2= = 4.0 Pi = 53.5 psia * .. x U PRESSURE DATA )F PRESSURE-DERIVATIVE DATA - SIMULATIONS *\ ***((c * ** *** * * 10-1 DIMENSIONLESS TIME GROUP, tD/cD Figure 532. H-l4/Culebra First Buildup Log-Log Plot with INTERPRET Simulation 0 a w K 3 v) v) W a n v) v) W -I z 2 v) 2 W I E 10' 10-1 100 10' 102 I I 1 MATCH PARAMETERS AP = 1.0psi t = 1.0 hr PO = 0.135 tD/cn = 180 COeZS = 2.0 Pi = 69.0 psia 00 10'' _. DIMENSIONLESS TIME GROUP. tdCo * * 0 PRESSURE DATA * * PRESSURE-DERIVATIVE DATA * - SIMULATIONS * Figure 5-33. H-l4/Culebra Second Buildup Log-Log Plot with INTERPRET Simulation 103 72
The simulation is representative of a singleporosity medium with a transmissivity of 0.31 ftzfday (Table 5-3). Assuming a Culebra porosity of 20%, a total-system compressibility of 1 .O x 10-5 psi-1, and a fluid viscosity of 1.0 cp, the skin factor for this simulation is about -1.8. These values are in excellent agreement with the FBU results, and indicate possible slight well development during the DST's. Again, the decline in the pressure derivative in Figure 5-33 at late time shows the continuing influence of the overpressure skin on the data. Figure 5-34 shows a semilog plot of the rising-head slug-test data, along with the best-fit type curve. This fit provides a transmissivity estimate of 0.30 ftz/day (Table 5-3). which is in excellent agreement with the FBU and SBU results. This fit was achieved using a static formation pressure estimate of 90.0 psia, slightly below the pressure measured at the end of the SBU. The transducer used for the DST's and slug test was set at a depth of 514.7 ft. The fluid in the hole during the testing had a specific gravity of 1.003, and the transducer measured an atmospheric pressure of 12.3 psia before testing began. Hence, 90.0 psia at the transducer depth corresponds to a static formation pressure of about 96.5 psig at the midpoint of the Culebra about 558 ft deep. Conclusions: The Culebra is 26.5 ft thick at H-14. The transmissivity of the upper 5.8 ft is 0.10 ftZ/day, while that of the entire unit is 0.30 ftz/day. Hence, the average hydraulic conductivity of the upper 5.8 ft of the Culebra appears to be about 1.8 times greater than that of the lower 20.7 ft. This difference does not represent a great degree of heterogeneity. Left unresolved by this testing is the distribution of hydraulic conductivity within the Culebra on a finer scale, such as hydraulic-conductivity differences between those portions that are less competent and core quickly, and those that are more competent and core more slowly. 1 .o 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0 F I 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 I,-, = 295:17:3555 10-3 10-2 lo-' 100 ELAPSED TIME, hours 10' 102 Figure 5-34. H-I4/Culebra Slug-Test Plot 73
Page 1 and 2:
SANDIA REPORT SAND87 -0039 UC - 70
Page 3 and 4:
SAND87-0039 Unlimited Release Print
Page 5:
a transmissivity of about 7 x 10-2
Page 8 and 9:
5 . TEST OBJECTIVES AND INTERPRETAT
Page 10 and 11:
3-18 3-19 3-20 3-21 3-22 3-23 3-24
Page 12 and 13:
5-35 H-l5/Culebra Drillstem and Slu
Page 14 and 15:
5-78 5-79 5-80 5-81 5-82 5-83 5-84
Page 16 and 17:
A-2 A-3 A4 A-5 A-6 Single-Porosity
Page 18 and 19:
'H-6 o DOE-2 OHIPP-13 OAIPP 12 OH-1
Page 20 and 21:
WlPP site. The aggregate thickness
Page 22 and 23: deep. The gamma-ray log used to gui
Page 24 and 25: 3347.11 ft \ - -12.25-inch HOLE -8.
Page 26 and 27: ~ 3409.6 n __ - - HOLOCENE DEPOSITS
Page 28 and 29: Ylf M (t -1wt 5 n nch REAMED BOREHO
Page 30 and 31: 3418.96 n 7.875-inch REAMED BOREHOL
Page 32 and 33: 2.375-inch TUBING 4.5-inch. 9.5 Ibl
Page 34 and 35: WELL CASING 2.375-inch TUBING TEST-
Page 36 and 37: 1.5-Inch GALVANIZED PIPE WELL CASIN
Page 38 and 39: I I I I PRE-TEST STATIC PRESSURE i/
Page 40 and 41: (or areal extent) of the aquifer on
Page 42 and 43: :7001 J EQUILIBRATION / r.. .......
Page 44 and 45: Once straddle tests proved impossib
Page 46 and 47: 1300 c - J PRE-TEST PRESSURE IN TES
Page 48 and 49: - < a m L: * m 3 L a I Start Date:
Page 50 and 51: uildups were caused by the natural
Page 52 and 53: TABLE 5-1 EFFECTIVE DST FLOW RATES
Page 54 and 55: TABLE 5-2 SUMMARY OF NON-CULEBRA SI
Page 56 and 57: simulation shown, however, uses a t
Page 58 and 59: 1 .o 0.9 0.8 p' = 79.08 paig pi = 6
Page 60 and 61: ~ ~~ TABLE 5-3 SUMMARY OF CULEBRA S
Page 62 and 63: Two factors raised questions about
Page 64 and 65: 102 I I 1 1 1 W K 3 v) v) W K n v)
Page 66 and 67: 5.2.2.21 below) and DOE-2 (Beauheim
Page 68 and 69: ..A 225 - PRESSURE ABOVE TEST INTER
Page 70 and 71: 10' n ui K 3 v) v) W a n v) v) 100
Page 74 and 75: ..CI__._._..__....__.I 5.2.2.6 H-15
Page 76 and 77: 8.0 1 I I I MATCH PARAMETERS AP 1.0
Page 78 and 79: - 200 150 5 - EQUILIBRATION \Feu 'S
Page 80 and 81: 4.0 1 I 1 1 3.0 I n 2.0 1 .o 0.0 0.
Page 82 and 83: 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0 0.5 0.4 0.3 0
Page 84 and 85: 3.0 .hl c El2 2.0 . v n I P 1 .o MA
Page 86 and 87: EI€3- 0.9 "O I OOATA - TYPE CURVE
Page 88 and 89: 4.0 I I I 3.0 MATCH PARAMETERS AP =
Page 90 and 91: 1 .o 0.9 0.8 0.7 1 MATCH PARAMETERS
Page 92 and 93: 1 .o 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0 2 0.5 I 0.4
Page 94 and 95: 1.0, 0 I 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 MA
Page 96 and 97: P-15 was bailed on four occasions i
Page 98 and 99: 1 .o 0.9 0.8 - p’ = 78.93 prig p,
Page 100 and 101: Two type-curve matches are shown wi
Page 102 and 103: 0 5 I ELAPSED TIME. hours Figure 5-
Page 104 and 105: 10’ 1 I I I n a w 5 100 v) v) W a
Page 106 and 107: MATCH PARAMETERS -ip 10 PSI 150 t 1
Page 108 and 109: Considering that all other pumping
Page 110 and 111: I ,EQUILIBRATION BUILDUP Elapsed Ti
Page 112 and 113: 0 9. w 10’ K =a 100 v) v) W a n v
Page 114 and 115: 10’ I I I a J P 100 v) v) W a n v
Page 116 and 117: ~ ~. SLUG t i /- i 3 Start Date 07
Page 118 and 119: Figure 5-94 is a log-log plot of th
Page 120 and 121: was followed by a 92-minute FBU. Th
Page 122 and 123:
10’ 1 1 1 1 a n w’ a = 100 v) v
Page 124 and 125:
and anhydrite, and were not conside
Page 126 and 127:
4.0 MATCH PARAMETERS .A. L. 21% 3.0
Page 128 and 129:
Estimates of the static formation p
Page 130 and 131:
10’ n w 2 100 v) v) w a P v) v) w
Page 132 and 133:
OWIPP-28. 70 OWIPP-27.650 OWIPP-30.
Page 134 and 135:
to Nash Draw where no halite is pre
Page 136 and 137:
observations regarding the potentia
Page 138 and 139:
7. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS Single-w
Page 140 and 141:
REFERENCES Bachman, G.O. 1984. Regi
Page 142 and 143:
INTERA Technologies, Inc. 1986. WlP
Page 144 and 145:
Stensrud, W.A.; Bame, M.A.; Lantr,
Page 146 and 147:
(A-4)
Page 148 and 149:
distinct value of Coe2s. Pressure-d
Page 150 and 151:
The wellbore storage coefficient is
Page 152 and 153:
where: n = number of normal sets of
Page 154 and 155:
(A-21) and for spherical blocks the
Page 156 and 157:
where: tp* = Vfq, V = total flow pr
Page 158 and 159:
Figure A-5. Semilog Slug-Test Type
Page 160 and 161:
A.4 INTERPRET WELL-TEST INTERPRETAT
Page 162 and 163:
DISTRIBUTION: U. S. Department of E
Page 164 and 165:
INTERA Technologies, Inc. (9) 6580
Page 166 and 167:
WlPP Public Reading Room Carlsbad M
Page 168 and 169:
Nationale Genossenschaft fur die La
show all

Beauheim 1987 - Waste Isolation Pilot Plant - U.S. Department of ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?