Beauheim 1987 - Waste Isolation Pilot Plant - U.S. Department of ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

3.0 .hl c El2 2.0 . v n I P 1 .o MATCH PARAMETERS AP t = 1.0 psi = 1.0 hi PD = 0.062 tdCD =550 I CDe” =I P’ = 145.5 psia + DATA -SIMULATION I I 0.0 0.0 0.5 1 .o 1.5 2.0 2.5 DIMENSIONLESS SUPERPOSITION FUNCTION: FLOW PERIOD 3 Figure 5-49. H-l7/Culebra First Buildup Dimensionless Homer Plot with INTERPRET Simulation The SBU data log-log plot and simulation (Figure 5-50) are very similar to those of the FBU data (Figure 548). The SBU simulation is representative of a single-porosity medium with a transmissivity of 0.22 ftzlday (Table 5-3). The skin factor for this simulation is -1 -2, again indicating a moderately stimulated well. Overpressure skin effects are evident in both the SBU log-log plot and the dimensionless Horner plot (Figure 5-51). On the former, the pressure derivative declines at late time, and on the latter, the late-time data trend toward a pressure lower than the static formation pressure of 144.6 psia specified for that simulation. In fact, the buildup pressure reached a maximum of 143.7 psia after about 7.5 hr of the SBU (Figure 5-47), and declined very slightly for the last 8 hr of the SBU. The data from these last 8 hr are not included on the analysis plots. Figure 5-52 presents a semilog plot of the risinghead slug-test data, along with the best-fit typecurve match. This match provides a transmissivity estimate of 0.22 ft*/day (Table 5-3), which is in excellent agreement with the DST results. The static formation pressure estimate used to fit the data in Figure 5-52 is 143.0 psia. In actuality, the fluid pressure peaked at 142.3 psia after 27 hr of the slug test, and declined slightly thereafter, indicating continued dissipation of an overpressure skin. The data collected after the pressure peaked are not included on this plot. The analyses of the H-17 Culebra tests provide consistent transmissivity estimates of about 0.2 ftZ/day. Thus, H-17 is not located in the hightransmissivity zone hypothesized by Haug et al. (1987) and Bartel (in preparation). This zone, if it exists, must lie farther to the west towards P-17 (Figure 1-1). 5.2.2.9 H-18. The objective of the Culebra testing at H-18 was to help determine where the transition occurs between the high-transmissivity region that includes WIPP-13 (69 ft2/day; Beauheim, 1987b) and the low-transmissivity region that includes H-2 (0.4 ft*/day; Mercer, 1983) (Figure 1-1). At H-18, the Culebra lies from 688.6 to 712.8 ft deep 84
10' n w' 3 v) v) W K P u) v) W 4 z 2 5 r 5 1Oc 10- * * MATCH PARAMETERS ** **** - "*x " li = 1.0 psi t = 1.0 hr * PD = 0.059 tdCD ~500 CDea =2 n PRESSURE DATA 9 PRESSURE-DERIVATIVE DATA PI = 86.0 psla - SIMULATIONS ** lo-' 100 101 102 103 104 DIMENSIONLESS TIME GROUP, tD/CD Figure 5-50. H-I i'/Culebra Second Buildup Log-Log Plot with INTERPRET Simulation 4.0 - h .L. n I 3.0 n . Bn 2.0 MATCH PARAMETERS AP = 1.0 psi t = 1.0 hr PD = 0.059 tdcD =SO0 CDea =2 P' = 144.6 psia 1 .o + DATA - SlMULATlON 0.0 0.0 1 .o 2.0 3.0 DIMENSIONLESS SUPERPOSITION FUNCTION: FLOW PERIOD 6 1 Figure 5-51. H-1 ?/Cutebra Second Buildup Dimensionless Homer Plot with INTERPRET Simulation 85
Page 1 and 2:
SANDIA REPORT SAND87 -0039 UC - 70
Page 3 and 4:
SAND87-0039 Unlimited Release Print
Page 5:
a transmissivity of about 7 x 10-2
Page 8 and 9:
5 . TEST OBJECTIVES AND INTERPRETAT
Page 10 and 11:
3-18 3-19 3-20 3-21 3-22 3-23 3-24
Page 12 and 13:
5-35 H-l5/Culebra Drillstem and Slu
Page 14 and 15:
5-78 5-79 5-80 5-81 5-82 5-83 5-84
Page 16 and 17:
A-2 A-3 A4 A-5 A-6 Single-Porosity
Page 18 and 19:
'H-6 o DOE-2 OHIPP-13 OAIPP 12 OH-1
Page 20 and 21:
WlPP site. The aggregate thickness
Page 22 and 23:
deep. The gamma-ray log used to gui
Page 24 and 25:
3347.11 ft \ - -12.25-inch HOLE -8.
Page 26 and 27:
~ 3409.6 n __ - - HOLOCENE DEPOSITS
Page 28 and 29:
Ylf M (t -1wt 5 n nch REAMED BOREHO
Page 30 and 31:
3418.96 n 7.875-inch REAMED BOREHOL
Page 32 and 33:
2.375-inch TUBING 4.5-inch. 9.5 Ibl
Page 34 and 35: WELL CASING 2.375-inch TUBING TEST-
Page 36 and 37: 1.5-Inch GALVANIZED PIPE WELL CASIN
Page 38 and 39: I I I I PRE-TEST STATIC PRESSURE i/
Page 40 and 41: (or areal extent) of the aquifer on
Page 42 and 43: :7001 J EQUILIBRATION / r.. .......
Page 44 and 45: Once straddle tests proved impossib
Page 46 and 47: 1300 c - J PRE-TEST PRESSURE IN TES
Page 48 and 49: - < a m L: * m 3 L a I Start Date:
Page 50 and 51: uildups were caused by the natural
Page 52 and 53: TABLE 5-1 EFFECTIVE DST FLOW RATES
Page 54 and 55: TABLE 5-2 SUMMARY OF NON-CULEBRA SI
Page 56 and 57: simulation shown, however, uses a t
Page 58 and 59: 1 .o 0.9 0.8 p' = 79.08 paig pi = 6
Page 60 and 61: ~ ~~ TABLE 5-3 SUMMARY OF CULEBRA S
Page 62 and 63: Two factors raised questions about
Page 64 and 65: 102 I I 1 1 1 W K 3 v) v) W K n v)
Page 66 and 67: 5.2.2.21 below) and DOE-2 (Beauheim
Page 68 and 69: ..A 225 - PRESSURE ABOVE TEST INTER
Page 70 and 71: 10' n ui K 3 v) v) W a n v) v) 100
Page 72 and 73: 10' MATCH PARAMETERS O n w a 3 v) v
Page 74 and 75: ..CI__._._..__....__.I 5.2.2.6 H-15
Page 76 and 77: 8.0 1 I I I MATCH PARAMETERS AP 1.0
Page 78 and 79: - 200 150 5 - EQUILIBRATION \Feu 'S
Page 80 and 81: 4.0 1 I 1 1 3.0 I n 2.0 1 .o 0.0 0.
Page 82 and 83: 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0 0.5 0.4 0.3 0
Page 86 and 87: EI€3- 0.9 "O I OOATA - TYPE CURVE
Page 88 and 89: 4.0 I I I 3.0 MATCH PARAMETERS AP =
Page 90 and 91: 1 .o 0.9 0.8 0.7 1 MATCH PARAMETERS
Page 92 and 93: 1 .o 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0 2 0.5 I 0.4
Page 94 and 95: 1.0, 0 I 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 MA
Page 96 and 97: P-15 was bailed on four occasions i
Page 98 and 99: 1 .o 0.9 0.8 - p’ = 78.93 prig p,
Page 100 and 101: Two type-curve matches are shown wi
Page 102 and 103: 0 5 I ELAPSED TIME. hours Figure 5-
Page 104 and 105: 10’ 1 I I I n a w 5 100 v) v) W a
Page 106 and 107: MATCH PARAMETERS -ip 10 PSI 150 t 1
Page 108 and 109: Considering that all other pumping
Page 110 and 111: I ,EQUILIBRATION BUILDUP Elapsed Ti
Page 112 and 113: 0 9. w 10’ K =a 100 v) v) W a n v
Page 114 and 115: 10’ I I I a J P 100 v) v) W a n v
Page 116 and 117: ~ ~. SLUG t i /- i 3 Start Date 07
Page 118 and 119: Figure 5-94 is a log-log plot of th
Page 120 and 121: was followed by a 92-minute FBU. Th
Page 122 and 123: 10’ 1 1 1 1 a n w’ a = 100 v) v
Page 124 and 125: and anhydrite, and were not conside
Page 126 and 127: 4.0 MATCH PARAMETERS .A. L. 21% 3.0
Page 128 and 129: Estimates of the static formation p
Page 130 and 131: 10’ n w 2 100 v) v) w a P v) v) w
Page 132 and 133: OWIPP-28. 70 OWIPP-27.650 OWIPP-30.
Page 134 and 135:
to Nash Draw where no halite is pre
Page 136 and 137:
observations regarding the potentia
Page 138 and 139:
7. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS Single-w
Page 140 and 141:
REFERENCES Bachman, G.O. 1984. Regi
Page 142 and 143:
INTERA Technologies, Inc. 1986. WlP
Page 144 and 145:
Stensrud, W.A.; Bame, M.A.; Lantr,
Page 146 and 147:
(A-4)
Page 148 and 149:
distinct value of Coe2s. Pressure-d
Page 150 and 151:
The wellbore storage coefficient is
Page 152 and 153:
where: n = number of normal sets of
Page 154 and 155:
(A-21) and for spherical blocks the
Page 156 and 157:
where: tp* = Vfq, V = total flow pr
Page 158 and 159:
Figure A-5. Semilog Slug-Test Type
Page 160 and 161:
A.4 INTERPRET WELL-TEST INTERPRETAT
Page 162 and 163:
DISTRIBUTION: U. S. Department of E
Page 164 and 165:
INTERA Technologies, Inc. (9) 6580
Page 166 and 167:
WlPP Public Reading Room Carlsbad M
Page 168 and 169:
Nationale Genossenschaft fur die La
show all

Beauheim 1987 - Waste Isolation Pilot Plant - U.S. Department of ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?