Beauheim 1987 - Waste Isolation Pilot Plant - U.S. Department of ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

and anhydrite, and were not considered to have contributed significantly to the fluid-pressure responses observed. Descriptions of the test instrumentation and the test data are presented in Stensrud et al. (1988). Testing was performed on July 27 and 28,1987, and consisted of a pulse-injection test followed by two DST flow periods, two buildup periods, and a risinghead slug test (Figure 5-101). The pulse test lasted about 249 minutes. The FFL lasted about 21 minutes, and was followed by a 429-minute FBU. The SFL lasted about 31 minutes, and was followed by a 594-minute SBU. To obtain constant flow rates for buildup analyses, the FFL was divided into two flow periods having flow rates of 0.010 and 0.005 gpm, and the SFL was divided into two flow periods having flow rates of 0.016 and 0.007 gpm (Table 51). The slug test lasted about 263 minutes, with only about 4.5% of the induced pressure differential dissipating during this time. Figure 5-102 is a semilog plot of the Forty-niner pulse-test data, showing the best typecurve match achieved. The data and type curve match reasonably well, with the greatest discrepancy occurring at early time. The transmissivity calculated from this match is 2.2 x 10-4 ft2/day (Table 5-2). Figure 5-103 is a log-log plot of the DST FEU data, along with a simulation generated by INTERPRET. The simulation fit the data very well, and is representative of a single-porosity medium with a transmissivity of 5.3 x 10-3 ftz/day (Table 5-2). Assuming a porosity of 30%. a total-system compressibility of 1 .O x 10-5 psi-', and a fluid viscosity of 1.0 cp, the skin factor for this simulation is 0.7, indicating a wellbore with little damage. The decline in the pressure derivative at late time reflects minor overpressure-skin effects. The dimensionless Homer plot of the FBU data (Figure 5-104) shows an excellent fit between the data and the simulation using a static formation pressure estimate of 11 7.2 psia. J PULSE J /EQUILIBRATION PRESSURE ABOVE TEST INTERVAL - A. -- A I FBU \s~u - o k I 10 ' I I I I I 20 In I I I 30 I I I I 40 ' I I I I I I 50 I I I 60 ' I FFL I I 70 a I b SFL 3-- SLUG 00 I * uLu 90 I * 100 124
1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0 5 0.5 I 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1 100 10' ELAPSED TIME, hours Figure 5-1 02. H-1 G/Forty-Niner Clay Pulse-Test Plot 10 0 n w' = 10 i2UJ W U P UJ v) 5 2 E! ; I 0 10 MATCH PARAMETERS 1 I I 1 I AP = 1.0 pal t = 1.0 hr 1 PO = 0.064 tdC, = 14 I I [I PRESSURE DATA .i PRESSURE-DERIVATIVE DATA - SIMULATIONS 10- I I I 1 10-2 lo-' 100 10' 102 DIMENSIONLESS TIME GROUP, tD/CD 103 Figure 5-103. H-lG/Forty-Niner Clay First Buildup Log-Log Plot with INTERPRET Simulation 125
Page 1 and 2:
SANDIA REPORT SAND87 -0039 UC - 70
Page 3 and 4:
SAND87-0039 Unlimited Release Print
Page 5:
a transmissivity of about 7 x 10-2
Page 8 and 9:
5 . TEST OBJECTIVES AND INTERPRETAT
Page 10 and 11:
3-18 3-19 3-20 3-21 3-22 3-23 3-24
Page 12 and 13:
5-35 H-l5/Culebra Drillstem and Slu
Page 14 and 15:
5-78 5-79 5-80 5-81 5-82 5-83 5-84
Page 16 and 17:
A-2 A-3 A4 A-5 A-6 Single-Porosity
Page 18 and 19:
'H-6 o DOE-2 OHIPP-13 OAIPP 12 OH-1
Page 20 and 21:
WlPP site. The aggregate thickness
Page 22 and 23:
deep. The gamma-ray log used to gui
Page 24 and 25:
3347.11 ft \ - -12.25-inch HOLE -8.
Page 26 and 27:
~ 3409.6 n __ - - HOLOCENE DEPOSITS
Page 28 and 29:
Ylf M (t -1wt 5 n nch REAMED BOREHO
Page 30 and 31:
3418.96 n 7.875-inch REAMED BOREHOL
Page 32 and 33:
2.375-inch TUBING 4.5-inch. 9.5 Ibl
Page 34 and 35:
WELL CASING 2.375-inch TUBING TEST-
Page 36 and 37:
1.5-Inch GALVANIZED PIPE WELL CASIN
Page 38 and 39:
I I I I PRE-TEST STATIC PRESSURE i/
Page 40 and 41:
(or areal extent) of the aquifer on
Page 42 and 43:
:7001 J EQUILIBRATION / r.. .......
Page 44 and 45:
Once straddle tests proved impossib
Page 46 and 47:
1300 c - J PRE-TEST PRESSURE IN TES
Page 48 and 49:
- < a m L: * m 3 L a I Start Date:
Page 50 and 51:
uildups were caused by the natural
Page 52 and 53:
TABLE 5-1 EFFECTIVE DST FLOW RATES
Page 54 and 55:
TABLE 5-2 SUMMARY OF NON-CULEBRA SI
Page 56 and 57:
simulation shown, however, uses a t
Page 58 and 59:
1 .o 0.9 0.8 p' = 79.08 paig pi = 6
Page 60 and 61:
~ ~~ TABLE 5-3 SUMMARY OF CULEBRA S
Page 62 and 63:
Two factors raised questions about
Page 64 and 65:
102 I I 1 1 1 W K 3 v) v) W K n v)
Page 66 and 67:
5.2.2.21 below) and DOE-2 (Beauheim
Page 68 and 69:
..A 225 - PRESSURE ABOVE TEST INTER
Page 70 and 71:
10' n ui K 3 v) v) W a n v) v) 100
Page 72 and 73:
10' MATCH PARAMETERS O n w a 3 v) v
Page 74 and 75: ..CI__._._..__....__.I 5.2.2.6 H-15
Page 76 and 77: 8.0 1 I I I MATCH PARAMETERS AP 1.0
Page 78 and 79: - 200 150 5 - EQUILIBRATION \Feu 'S
Page 80 and 81: 4.0 1 I 1 1 3.0 I n 2.0 1 .o 0.0 0.
Page 82 and 83: 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0 0.5 0.4 0.3 0
Page 84 and 85: 3.0 .hl c El2 2.0 . v n I P 1 .o MA
Page 86 and 87: EI€3- 0.9 "O I OOATA - TYPE CURVE
Page 88 and 89: 4.0 I I I 3.0 MATCH PARAMETERS AP =
Page 90 and 91: 1 .o 0.9 0.8 0.7 1 MATCH PARAMETERS
Page 92 and 93: 1 .o 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0 2 0.5 I 0.4
Page 94 and 95: 1.0, 0 I 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 MA
Page 96 and 97: P-15 was bailed on four occasions i
Page 98 and 99: 1 .o 0.9 0.8 - p’ = 78.93 prig p,
Page 100 and 101: Two type-curve matches are shown wi
Page 102 and 103: 0 5 I ELAPSED TIME. hours Figure 5-
Page 104 and 105: 10’ 1 I I I n a w 5 100 v) v) W a
Page 106 and 107: MATCH PARAMETERS -ip 10 PSI 150 t 1
Page 108 and 109: Considering that all other pumping
Page 110 and 111: I ,EQUILIBRATION BUILDUP Elapsed Ti
Page 112 and 113: 0 9. w 10’ K =a 100 v) v) W a n v
Page 114 and 115: 10’ I I I a J P 100 v) v) W a n v
Page 116 and 117: ~ ~. SLUG t i /- i 3 Start Date 07
Page 118 and 119: Figure 5-94 is a log-log plot of th
Page 120 and 121: was followed by a 92-minute FBU. Th
Page 122 and 123: 10’ 1 1 1 1 a n w’ a = 100 v) v
Page 126 and 127: 4.0 MATCH PARAMETERS .A. L. 21% 3.0
Page 128 and 129: Estimates of the static formation p
Page 130 and 131: 10’ n w 2 100 v) v) w a P v) v) w
Page 132 and 133: OWIPP-28. 70 OWIPP-27.650 OWIPP-30.
Page 134 and 135: to Nash Draw where no halite is pre
Page 136 and 137: observations regarding the potentia
Page 138 and 139: 7. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS Single-w
Page 140 and 141: REFERENCES Bachman, G.O. 1984. Regi
Page 142 and 143: INTERA Technologies, Inc. 1986. WlP
Page 144 and 145: Stensrud, W.A.; Bame, M.A.; Lantr,
Page 146 and 147: (A-4)
Page 148 and 149: distinct value of Coe2s. Pressure-d
Page 150 and 151: The wellbore storage coefficient is
Page 152 and 153: where: n = number of normal sets of
Page 154 and 155: (A-21) and for spherical blocks the
Page 156 and 157: where: tp* = Vfq, V = total flow pr
Page 158 and 159: Figure A-5. Semilog Slug-Test Type
Page 160 and 161: A.4 INTERPRET WELL-TEST INTERPRETAT
Page 162 and 163: DISTRIBUTION: U. S. Department of E
Page 164 and 165: INTERA Technologies, Inc. (9) 6580
Page 166 and 167: WlPP Public Reading Room Carlsbad M
Page 168 and 169: Nationale Genossenschaft fur die La
show all

Beauheim 1987 - Waste Isolation Pilot Plant - U.S. Department of ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?