Beauheim 1987 - Waste Isolation Pilot Plant - U.S. Department of ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

3418.96 n 7.875-inch REAMED BOREHOLE - TRAILER 2.375-inch TUBING ANNULUS TRANSDUCER DRUCK PDCR IOlD TEST-INTERVAL TRANSDUCER DRUCK PDCR 101D BASK1 PACKER The depth discrepancy may be due to one of the two surveys having incorrectly "zeroed" a depth counter. Inasmuch as the 1985 survey and the subsequent perforation were run using the same depth counter and the same datum, the correct interval was probably perforated, whatever its true absolute depth. From June 11 to 17, 1986, WIPP-22 was developed by pumping and surging (Saulnier et al., 1987). For slug testing, a PIP was temporarily set in the well casing from 738.1 to 742.5 ft on 2.375-inch tubing. The configuration of the well at the time of testing is shown in Figure 3-16. 2.375-Inch TUBING 5.5-inch. 15.5 Ib/n WELL CASING NNULUS TRANSDUCER RUCK PDCR lOlD TEST-INTERVAL TRANSDUCER DRUCK PDCR 10fD ALL DEPTHS BELOW GROUND SURFACE NOT TO SCALE 7.875-inch REAMED BOREHOLE BASK1 PACKER Figure 3-1 5. Well Configuration for WIPP-21 Slug Test 3.14 WIPP-22 WIPP-22 was drilled as part of the same program as WIPP-18, WIPP-19, and WIPP-21 in 1978 (Sandia and USGS, 1980d). The hole was drilled to a total depth of 1448 ft, 565 ft into the Salado Formation. WIPP-22 was then abandoned in an open-hole condition filled with brine mud until October 1985, when the hole was recompleted to serve as a Culebra observation well. The borehole was reamed to a diameter of 7.875 inches, and 5.5-inch casing was installed and cemented from the surface to a depth of 949.8 ft. The Culebra interval was then shot-perforated from 748 to 770 ft deep, based on gamma-ray logging performed to locate the Culebra. Sandia and USGS (1980d) report the Culebra 6 ft higher, from 742 to 764 ft deep. The source of the 6-ft discrepancy between the 1978 and 1985 surveys is unknown. ALL DEPTHS BELOW GROUND SURFACE NOT TO SCALE Figure 3-16. Well Configuration for WIPP-22 Slug Test 3.15 WIPP-30 Well WIPPBO was drilled in September 1978 as one of six wells drilled to evaluate dissolution of nearsurface rocks in and adjacent to Nash Draw (Sandia and USGS, 1980). WIPP-30 was cored and reamed to 30
a diameter of 8.75 inches to a depth of 246 ft, and then deepened to 913 ft by coring and reaming to a diameter of 7.875 inches. Casing (5.5-inch) was installed and cemented from 912 ft to the surface. In March, July, and September 1980, three sections of the casing were perforated: the Rustler/Salado contact zone from 731 to 753 ft; the interval from 631 to 654 ft which includes the Culebra from 631 to 653 ft; and the interval from 510 to 540 ft which includes the Magenta from 513 to 537 ft (Seward, 1982). Retrievable bridge plugs were set at depths of 688.5 and 590.7 ft in September 1980. In August 1983, the upper bridge plug was replaced with a PIP set on 2.375-inch tubing at a depth of 570 ft to allow monitoring of the Culebra water level through the tubing, and the Magenta water level through the annulus between the casing and tubing. 5.5-inch. 15.5 Ib/ff REAMED BOREHOLE TEST-INTERVAL TRANSDUCE DRUCK PDCR lOlD BASK1 7.5-inch PACKER 3429 04 If 3420 4I I T 2 375-Inch TUBING ULUS TRANSDUCER In October 1987, the PIP was removed and the casing was reperforated between the depths of 629 and 655 ft to improve the hydraulic connection between the Culebra and the well. In November 1987, the well was bailed once and pumped 4 times (with both the Culebra and Magenta open to the well) to develop the perforations. On December 8, 1987, the well was pumped a final time to provide water for use in the subsequent slug tests, and a PIP was set from 613.1 to 617.5 ft in the well on 2.375-inch tubing. A minipacker was installed in the tubing from 599.4 to 601.1 ft, and was removed after testing was completed. The configuration of WIPP-30 at the time of testing is shown in Figure 3-1 7. 3.16 P-15 Well P-15 was drilled in October 1976 as part of a 21 -well evaluation program to investigate the potash resources in the Salado Formation at the proposed location of the WlPP site (Jones, 1978). P-15 was drilled and reamed to a diameter of 7.875 inches to a depth of 637 ft, and 4.5-inch casing was installed and cemented from 635 ft to the surface. The hole was deepened by coring at a 4-inch diameter to 1465 ft, and the bottom of the hole was plugged back to 620 ft with cement (Mercer and Orr, 1979). In January and April 1977, two sections of the casing were perforated: the Rustler/Salado contact zone from 532 to 556 ft deep: and the intewal from 410 to 438 ft which includes the Culebra from 413 to 435 ft. ALL DEPTHS BELOW GROUND SURFACE Figure 3-1 7. NOT TO SCALE Well Configuration for WIPP-30 Slug Tests A PIP was set in the casing at a depth of 512 ft on 2.375-inch tubing to allow monitoring of Rustler/Salado and Culebra water levels. The PIP was determined to be leaking in May 1985, and was replaced on June 6, 1985 with a retrievable bridge plug set from 441 to 447 ft deep. P-15 was developed by bailing on March 27, April 7, 16, and 21, 1987 in preparation for slug testing (Stensrud et al., 1988). A PIP on 2.375-inch tubing was set in the well casing temporarily from 389.6 to 393.9 ft in May 1987 to aid in the testing. The configuration of P-15 at the time of testing is shown in Figure 3-18. 3.17 P-17 P-17 was drilled in October 1976 as part of the potash-resource evaluation program at the proposed location for the WlPP site (Jones, 1978). The hole was first rotary drilled at a diameter of 7.875-inches to a depth of 755 ft, approximately 40 ft into the Salado 31
Page 1 and 2: SANDIA REPORT SAND87 -0039 UC - 70
Page 3 and 4: SAND87-0039 Unlimited Release Print
Page 5: a transmissivity of about 7 x 10-2
Page 8 and 9: 5 . TEST OBJECTIVES AND INTERPRETAT
Page 10 and 11: 3-18 3-19 3-20 3-21 3-22 3-23 3-24
Page 12 and 13: 5-35 H-l5/Culebra Drillstem and Slu
Page 14 and 15: 5-78 5-79 5-80 5-81 5-82 5-83 5-84
Page 16 and 17: A-2 A-3 A4 A-5 A-6 Single-Porosity
Page 18 and 19: 'H-6 o DOE-2 OHIPP-13 OAIPP 12 OH-1
Page 20 and 21: WlPP site. The aggregate thickness
Page 22 and 23: deep. The gamma-ray log used to gui
Page 24 and 25: 3347.11 ft \ - -12.25-inch HOLE -8.
Page 26 and 27: ~ 3409.6 n __ - - HOLOCENE DEPOSITS
Page 28 and 29: Ylf M (t -1wt 5 n nch REAMED BOREHO
Page 32 and 33: 2.375-inch TUBING 4.5-inch. 9.5 Ibl
Page 34 and 35: WELL CASING 2.375-inch TUBING TEST-
Page 36 and 37: 1.5-Inch GALVANIZED PIPE WELL CASIN
Page 38 and 39: I I I I PRE-TEST STATIC PRESSURE i/
Page 40 and 41: (or areal extent) of the aquifer on
Page 42 and 43: :7001 J EQUILIBRATION / r.. .......
Page 44 and 45: Once straddle tests proved impossib
Page 46 and 47: 1300 c - J PRE-TEST PRESSURE IN TES
Page 48 and 49: - < a m L: * m 3 L a I Start Date:
Page 50 and 51: uildups were caused by the natural
Page 52 and 53: TABLE 5-1 EFFECTIVE DST FLOW RATES
Page 54 and 55: TABLE 5-2 SUMMARY OF NON-CULEBRA SI
Page 56 and 57: simulation shown, however, uses a t
Page 58 and 59: 1 .o 0.9 0.8 p' = 79.08 paig pi = 6
Page 60 and 61: ~ ~~ TABLE 5-3 SUMMARY OF CULEBRA S
Page 62 and 63: Two factors raised questions about
Page 64 and 65: 102 I I 1 1 1 W K 3 v) v) W K n v)
Page 66 and 67: 5.2.2.21 below) and DOE-2 (Beauheim
Page 68 and 69: ..A 225 - PRESSURE ABOVE TEST INTER
Page 70 and 71: 10' n ui K 3 v) v) W a n v) v) 100
Page 72 and 73: 10' MATCH PARAMETERS O n w a 3 v) v
Page 74 and 75: ..CI__._._..__....__.I 5.2.2.6 H-15
Page 76 and 77: 8.0 1 I I I MATCH PARAMETERS AP 1.0
Page 78 and 79: - 200 150 5 - EQUILIBRATION \Feu 'S
Page 80 and 81:
4.0 1 I 1 1 3.0 I n 2.0 1 .o 0.0 0.
Page 82 and 83:
1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0 0.5 0.4 0.3 0
Page 84 and 85:
3.0 .hl c El2 2.0 . v n I P 1 .o MA
Page 86 and 87:
EI€3- 0.9 "O I OOATA - TYPE CURVE
Page 88 and 89:
4.0 I I I 3.0 MATCH PARAMETERS AP =
Page 90 and 91:
1 .o 0.9 0.8 0.7 1 MATCH PARAMETERS
Page 92 and 93:
1 .o 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0 2 0.5 I 0.4
Page 94 and 95:
1.0, 0 I 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 MA
Page 96 and 97:
P-15 was bailed on four occasions i
Page 98 and 99:
1 .o 0.9 0.8 - p’ = 78.93 prig p,
Page 100 and 101:
Two type-curve matches are shown wi
Page 102 and 103:
0 5 I ELAPSED TIME. hours Figure 5-
Page 104 and 105:
10’ 1 I I I n a w 5 100 v) v) W a
Page 106 and 107:
MATCH PARAMETERS -ip 10 PSI 150 t 1
Page 108 and 109:
Considering that all other pumping
Page 110 and 111:
I ,EQUILIBRATION BUILDUP Elapsed Ti
Page 112 and 113:
0 9. w 10’ K =a 100 v) v) W a n v
Page 114 and 115:
10’ I I I a J P 100 v) v) W a n v
Page 116 and 117:
~ ~. SLUG t i /- i 3 Start Date 07
Page 118 and 119:
Figure 5-94 is a log-log plot of th
Page 120 and 121:
was followed by a 92-minute FBU. Th
Page 122 and 123:
10’ 1 1 1 1 a n w’ a = 100 v) v
Page 124 and 125:
and anhydrite, and were not conside
Page 126 and 127:
4.0 MATCH PARAMETERS .A. L. 21% 3.0
Page 128 and 129:
Estimates of the static formation p
Page 130 and 131:
10’ n w 2 100 v) v) w a P v) v) w
Page 132 and 133:
OWIPP-28. 70 OWIPP-27.650 OWIPP-30.
Page 134 and 135:
to Nash Draw where no halite is pre
Page 136 and 137:
observations regarding the potentia
Page 138 and 139:
7. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS Single-w
Page 140 and 141:
REFERENCES Bachman, G.O. 1984. Regi
Page 142 and 143:
INTERA Technologies, Inc. 1986. WlP
Page 144 and 145:
Stensrud, W.A.; Bame, M.A.; Lantr,
Page 146 and 147:
(A-4)
Page 148 and 149:
distinct value of Coe2s. Pressure-d
Page 150 and 151:
The wellbore storage coefficient is
Page 152 and 153:
where: n = number of normal sets of
Page 154 and 155:
(A-21) and for spherical blocks the
Page 156 and 157:
where: tp* = Vfq, V = total flow pr
Page 158 and 159:
Figure A-5. Semilog Slug-Test Type
Page 160 and 161:
A.4 INTERPRET WELL-TEST INTERPRETAT
Page 162 and 163:
DISTRIBUTION: U. S. Department of E
Page 164 and 165:
INTERA Technologies, Inc. (9) 6580
Page 166 and 167:
WlPP Public Reading Room Carlsbad M
Page 168 and 169:
Nationale Genossenschaft fur die La
show all

Beauheim 1987 - Waste Isolation Pilot Plant - U.S. Department of ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?