25.10.2014 Views

Beauheim 1987 - Waste Isolation Pilot Plant - U.S. Department of ...

Beauheim 1987 - Waste Isolation Pilot Plant - U.S. Department of ...

Beauheim 1987 - Waste Isolation Pilot Plant - U.S. Department of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Two factors raised questions about these<br />

datafinterpretations. First, reported Culebra<br />

transmissivities are higher at holes northwest (P-l4),<br />

southwest (H-7), northeast (H-3, DOE-l), and east (H-<br />

11) <strong>of</strong> H-4 than at H-4. Second, early tests <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Culebra at well DOE-2 appeared to indicate the<br />

presence <strong>of</strong> a recharge boundary, which was later<br />

shown to be simply poor hydraulic communication<br />

between the well and the formation. Good hydraulic<br />

communication was established by acidizing DOE-2,<br />

and subsequent tests revealed a transmissivity<br />

higher than previously estimated (<strong>Beauheim</strong>, 1986).<br />

Hence, concern arose as to whether the reported<br />

Culebra properties for H-4 were real, or were affected<br />

by poor communication between the H-4 wells and<br />

the formation.<br />

To resolve this question, H-4c was acidized and a<br />

falling-head slug test was performed to evaluate<br />

whether or not the acidization had resulted in an<br />

increase in the apparent transmissivity <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Culebra. Well H-4c was selected as the test well<br />

1 .o<br />

because it is a cased hole with perforations providing<br />

access to the Culebra, similar to DOE-2. The well<br />

was acidized on July 16, 1986, by injecting nearly<br />

200 gallons <strong>of</strong> a 20% hydrochloric acid solution at the<br />

Culebra level over a period <strong>of</strong> about 2 hr. After a<br />

waiting period <strong>of</strong> over an hour, the spent acid was<br />

swabbed from the well. The well was then<br />

developed over a 7-day period by repeatedly<br />

pumping most <strong>of</strong> the water from the well and<br />

allowing the water level to recover (Stensrud et al.,<br />

<strong>1987</strong>).<br />

On July 31, 1986, a falling-head slug test was<br />

initiated in HAC. The test continued tor about 45 hr<br />

until August 2, 1986. The data from this test are<br />

reported in Stensrud et al. (<strong>1987</strong>). A plot <strong>of</strong> the test<br />

data and the best fit to a slug-test type curve are<br />

shown in Figure 5-20. The good fit between the data<br />

and the type curve indicates that on the scale <strong>of</strong> the<br />

test, the Culebra at H-4c behaves hydraulically as a<br />

single-porosity medium. No evidence <strong>of</strong> a recharge<br />

boundary is observed in the data.<br />

0.9<br />

0.8 p* = 59.47 psig<br />

pi 103.90 psig<br />

0.7<br />

0.6<br />

0<br />

T 0.5<br />

I<br />

0.4<br />

t<br />

= 1.2hr<br />

0.3<br />

0.2<br />

0.1<br />

0.0<br />

10'3 10-2 lo-' 100 10' 102<br />

ELAPSED TIME, hours<br />

Figure 5-20. H+c/Culebra Post-Acidiration Slug-Test Plot<br />

62

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!