Beauheim 1987 - Waste Isolation Pilot Plant - U.S. Department of ...
Beauheim 1987 - Waste Isolation Pilot Plant - U.S. Department of ...
Beauheim 1987 - Waste Isolation Pilot Plant - U.S. Department of ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
3.0<br />
.hl c<br />
El2<br />
2.0<br />
.<br />
v<br />
n<br />
I<br />
P<br />
1 .o<br />
MATCH PARAMETERS<br />
AP<br />
t<br />
= 1.0 psi<br />
= 1.0 hi<br />
PD = 0.062<br />
tdCD =550<br />
I CDe” =I<br />
P’ = 145.5 psia<br />
+ DATA<br />
-SIMULATION<br />
I<br />
I<br />
0.0<br />
0.0 0.5 1 .o 1.5 2.0 2.5<br />
DIMENSIONLESS SUPERPOSITION FUNCTION: FLOW PERIOD 3<br />
Figure 5-49. H-l7/Culebra First Buildup Dimensionless Homer Plot with INTERPRET Simulation<br />
The SBU data log-log plot and simulation<br />
(Figure 5-50) are very similar to those <strong>of</strong> the FBU data<br />
(Figure 548). The SBU simulation is representative<br />
<strong>of</strong> a single-porosity medium with a transmissivity <strong>of</strong><br />
0.22 ftzlday (Table 5-3). The skin factor for this<br />
simulation is -1 -2, again indicating a moderately<br />
stimulated well. Overpressure skin effects are<br />
evident in both the SBU log-log plot and the<br />
dimensionless Horner plot (Figure 5-51). On the<br />
former, the pressure derivative declines at late time,<br />
and on the latter, the late-time data trend toward a<br />
pressure lower than the static formation pressure <strong>of</strong><br />
144.6 psia specified for that simulation. In fact, the<br />
buildup pressure reached a maximum <strong>of</strong> 143.7 psia<br />
after about 7.5 hr <strong>of</strong> the SBU (Figure 5-47), and<br />
declined very slightly for the last 8 hr <strong>of</strong> the SBU.<br />
The data from these last 8 hr are not included on the<br />
analysis plots.<br />
Figure 5-52 presents a semilog plot <strong>of</strong> the risinghead<br />
slug-test data, along with the best-fit typecurve<br />
match. This match provides a transmissivity estimate<br />
<strong>of</strong> 0.22 ft*/day (Table 5-3), which is in excellent<br />
agreement with the DST results. The static formation<br />
pressure estimate used to fit the data in Figure 5-52<br />
is 143.0 psia. In actuality, the fluid pressure peaked<br />
at 142.3 psia after 27 hr <strong>of</strong> the slug test, and declined<br />
slightly thereafter, indicating continued dissipation <strong>of</strong><br />
an overpressure skin. The data collected after the<br />
pressure peaked are not included on this plot.<br />
The analyses <strong>of</strong> the H-17 Culebra tests provide<br />
consistent transmissivity estimates <strong>of</strong> about<br />
0.2 ftZ/day. Thus, H-17 is not located in the hightransmissivity<br />
zone hypothesized by Haug et al.<br />
(<strong>1987</strong>) and Bartel (in preparation). This zone, if it<br />
exists, must lie farther to the west towards P-17<br />
(Figure 1-1).<br />
5.2.2.9 H-18. The objective <strong>of</strong> the Culebra testing<br />
at H-18 was to help determine where the transition<br />
occurs between the high-transmissivity region that<br />
includes WIPP-13 (69 ft2/day; <strong>Beauheim</strong>, <strong>1987</strong>b) and<br />
the low-transmissivity region that includes H-2<br />
(0.4 ft*/day; Mercer, 1983) (Figure 1-1). At H-18, the<br />
Culebra lies from 688.6 to 712.8 ft deep<br />
84