25.10.2014 Views

Beauheim 1987 - Waste Isolation Pilot Plant - U.S. Department of ...

Beauheim 1987 - Waste Isolation Pilot Plant - U.S. Department of ...

Beauheim 1987 - Waste Isolation Pilot Plant - U.S. Department of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3.0<br />

.hl c<br />

El2<br />

2.0<br />

.<br />

v<br />

n<br />

I<br />

P<br />

1 .o<br />

MATCH PARAMETERS<br />

AP<br />

t<br />

= 1.0 psi<br />

= 1.0 hi<br />

PD = 0.062<br />

tdCD =550<br />

I CDe” =I<br />

P’ = 145.5 psia<br />

+ DATA<br />

-SIMULATION<br />

I<br />

I<br />

0.0<br />

0.0 0.5 1 .o 1.5 2.0 2.5<br />

DIMENSIONLESS SUPERPOSITION FUNCTION: FLOW PERIOD 3<br />

Figure 5-49. H-l7/Culebra First Buildup Dimensionless Homer Plot with INTERPRET Simulation<br />

The SBU data log-log plot and simulation<br />

(Figure 5-50) are very similar to those <strong>of</strong> the FBU data<br />

(Figure 548). The SBU simulation is representative<br />

<strong>of</strong> a single-porosity medium with a transmissivity <strong>of</strong><br />

0.22 ftzlday (Table 5-3). The skin factor for this<br />

simulation is -1 -2, again indicating a moderately<br />

stimulated well. Overpressure skin effects are<br />

evident in both the SBU log-log plot and the<br />

dimensionless Horner plot (Figure 5-51). On the<br />

former, the pressure derivative declines at late time,<br />

and on the latter, the late-time data trend toward a<br />

pressure lower than the static formation pressure <strong>of</strong><br />

144.6 psia specified for that simulation. In fact, the<br />

buildup pressure reached a maximum <strong>of</strong> 143.7 psia<br />

after about 7.5 hr <strong>of</strong> the SBU (Figure 5-47), and<br />

declined very slightly for the last 8 hr <strong>of</strong> the SBU.<br />

The data from these last 8 hr are not included on the<br />

analysis plots.<br />

Figure 5-52 presents a semilog plot <strong>of</strong> the risinghead<br />

slug-test data, along with the best-fit typecurve<br />

match. This match provides a transmissivity estimate<br />

<strong>of</strong> 0.22 ft*/day (Table 5-3), which is in excellent<br />

agreement with the DST results. The static formation<br />

pressure estimate used to fit the data in Figure 5-52<br />

is 143.0 psia. In actuality, the fluid pressure peaked<br />

at 142.3 psia after 27 hr <strong>of</strong> the slug test, and declined<br />

slightly thereafter, indicating continued dissipation <strong>of</strong><br />

an overpressure skin. The data collected after the<br />

pressure peaked are not included on this plot.<br />

The analyses <strong>of</strong> the H-17 Culebra tests provide<br />

consistent transmissivity estimates <strong>of</strong> about<br />

0.2 ftZ/day. Thus, H-17 is not located in the hightransmissivity<br />

zone hypothesized by Haug et al.<br />

(<strong>1987</strong>) and Bartel (in preparation). This zone, if it<br />

exists, must lie farther to the west towards P-17<br />

(Figure 1-1).<br />

5.2.2.9 H-18. The objective <strong>of</strong> the Culebra testing<br />

at H-18 was to help determine where the transition<br />

occurs between the high-transmissivity region that<br />

includes WIPP-13 (69 ft2/day; <strong>Beauheim</strong>, <strong>1987</strong>b) and<br />

the low-transmissivity region that includes H-2<br />

(0.4 ft*/day; Mercer, 1983) (Figure 1-1). At H-18, the<br />

Culebra lies from 688.6 to 712.8 ft deep<br />

84

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!