25.10.2014 Views

Beauheim 1987 - Waste Isolation Pilot Plant - U.S. Department of ...

Beauheim 1987 - Waste Isolation Pilot Plant - U.S. Department of ...

Beauheim 1987 - Waste Isolation Pilot Plant - U.S. Department of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The same equations are used to derive the fracture and matrix parameters, except that the matrix geometry<br />

must now be known or assumed to obtain the interporosity flow coefficient, A, from rearrangement <strong>of</strong> Eq (A-21)<br />

or (A-22).<br />

A.1.3<br />

Semilog Analysis<br />

Two semilog plotting techniques were employed in this report to interpret pumping-test and DST-buildup data.<br />

These techniques produce a Horner plot and a dimensionless Horner plot.<br />

Horner Plot<br />

Horner (1951) provided a method <strong>of</strong> obtaining permeability and static formation pressure values independent<br />

<strong>of</strong> log-log type-curve matching, although the two methods are best used in conjunction. Horner's method<br />

applies to the buildup (recovery) <strong>of</strong> the pressure after a constant-rate flow period in a well that fully penetrates a<br />

homogeneous, isotropic, horizontal, infinite, confined reservoir. For a recovery after a single flow period,<br />

Horner's solution is:<br />

where:<br />

p(t1 = p* - 162.6qBp kh<br />

log 15.4<br />

p(t) = pressure at timet, psi<br />

p' = static formation pressure, psi<br />

t, = duration <strong>of</strong> previous flow period, hr<br />

dt = time elapsed since end <strong>of</strong> flow period. hr<br />

(A-23)<br />

and other terms areas defined above under Eq (A-4). For a recovery after multiple flow periods, the time groi<br />

in Eq (A-23) is replaced by the superposition function given in the right-hand side <strong>of</strong> Eq (A-7).<br />

P<br />

The permeability-thickness product (kh) is obtained by (1) plotting p(t) versus log [(t, + dt)/dt] (or the<br />

superposition function), (2) drawing a straight line through the data determined from the log-log pressurederivative<br />

plot to be representative <strong>of</strong> infinite-acting radial flow, and (3) measuring the change in p(t) on this<br />

line over one log cycle <strong>of</strong> time (m). Equation (A-23) can then be rearranged and reduced to:<br />

kh = 162.6 qBp/m.<br />

(A-24)<br />

Static formation pressure is estimated by extrapolating the radial-flow straight line to the pressure axis where<br />

log [(t, + dt)/dt] = 1, representing infinite recovery time. In the absence <strong>of</strong> reservoir boundaries, the pressure<br />

intercept at that time should equal the static formation pressure.<br />

Horner (1951) also suggested a modification <strong>of</strong> his method for the case where the flow rate was not held<br />

constant. This modification was later theoretically verified for the case <strong>of</strong> constant-pressure, variable-rate<br />

production by Ehlig-Economides (1979). The modification entails calculating a modified production time:<br />

155

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!