25.10.2014 Views

Beauheim 1987 - Waste Isolation Pilot Plant - U.S. Department of ...

Beauheim 1987 - Waste Isolation Pilot Plant - U.S. Department of ...

Beauheim 1987 - Waste Isolation Pilot Plant - U.S. Department of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

and anhydrite, and were not considered to have<br />

contributed significantly to the fluid-pressure<br />

responses observed. Descriptions <strong>of</strong> the test<br />

instrumentation and the test data are presented in<br />

Stensrud et al. (1988).<br />

Testing was performed on July 27 and 28,<strong>1987</strong>, and<br />

consisted <strong>of</strong> a pulse-injection test followed by two<br />

DST flow periods, two buildup periods, and a risinghead<br />

slug test (Figure 5-101). The pulse test lasted<br />

about 249 minutes. The FFL lasted about 21<br />

minutes, and was followed by a 429-minute FBU.<br />

The SFL lasted about 31 minutes, and was followed<br />

by a 594-minute SBU. To obtain constant flow rates<br />

for buildup analyses, the FFL was divided into two<br />

flow periods having flow rates <strong>of</strong> 0.010 and<br />

0.005 gpm, and the SFL was divided into two flow<br />

periods having flow rates <strong>of</strong> 0.016 and 0.007 gpm<br />

(Table 51). The slug test lasted about 263 minutes,<br />

with only about 4.5% <strong>of</strong> the induced pressure<br />

differential dissipating during this time.<br />

Figure 5-102 is a semilog plot <strong>of</strong> the Forty-niner<br />

pulse-test data, showing the best typecurve match<br />

achieved. The data and type curve match<br />

reasonably well, with the greatest discrepancy<br />

occurring at early time. The transmissivity calculated<br />

from this match is 2.2 x 10-4 ft2/day (Table 5-2).<br />

Figure 5-103 is a log-log plot <strong>of</strong> the DST FEU data,<br />

along with a simulation generated by INTERPRET.<br />

The simulation fit the data very well, and is<br />

representative <strong>of</strong> a single-porosity medium with a<br />

transmissivity <strong>of</strong> 5.3 x 10-3 ftz/day (Table 5-2).<br />

Assuming a porosity <strong>of</strong> 30%. a total-system<br />

compressibility <strong>of</strong> 1 .O x 10-5 psi-', and a fluid viscosity<br />

<strong>of</strong> 1.0 cp, the skin factor for this simulation is 0.7,<br />

indicating a wellbore with little damage. The decline<br />

in the pressure derivative at late time reflects minor<br />

overpressure-skin effects. The dimensionless<br />

Homer plot <strong>of</strong> the FBU data (Figure 5-104) shows an<br />

excellent fit between the data and the simulation<br />

using a static formation pressure estimate <strong>of</strong><br />

11 7.2 psia.<br />

J PULSE<br />

J<br />

/EQUILIBRATION<br />

PRESSURE ABOVE TEST INTERVAL<br />

-<br />

A.<br />

-- A<br />

I FBU \s~u<br />

-<br />

o k<br />

I<br />

10 ' I<br />

I I I I 20 In I I I 30 I<br />

I I I 40 ' I I I I I I 50 I I I 60 ' I<br />

FFL<br />

I I 70 a<br />

I<br />

b<br />

SFL<br />

3--<br />

SLUG<br />

00 I * uLu 90 I * 100<br />

124

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!