Beauheim 1987 - Waste Isolation Pilot Plant - U.S. Department of ...
Beauheim 1987 - Waste Isolation Pilot Plant - U.S. Department of ...
Beauheim 1987 - Waste Isolation Pilot Plant - U.S. Department of ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
and anhydrite, and were not considered to have<br />
contributed significantly to the fluid-pressure<br />
responses observed. Descriptions <strong>of</strong> the test<br />
instrumentation and the test data are presented in<br />
Stensrud et al. (1988).<br />
Testing was performed on July 27 and 28,<strong>1987</strong>, and<br />
consisted <strong>of</strong> a pulse-injection test followed by two<br />
DST flow periods, two buildup periods, and a risinghead<br />
slug test (Figure 5-101). The pulse test lasted<br />
about 249 minutes. The FFL lasted about 21<br />
minutes, and was followed by a 429-minute FBU.<br />
The SFL lasted about 31 minutes, and was followed<br />
by a 594-minute SBU. To obtain constant flow rates<br />
for buildup analyses, the FFL was divided into two<br />
flow periods having flow rates <strong>of</strong> 0.010 and<br />
0.005 gpm, and the SFL was divided into two flow<br />
periods having flow rates <strong>of</strong> 0.016 and 0.007 gpm<br />
(Table 51). The slug test lasted about 263 minutes,<br />
with only about 4.5% <strong>of</strong> the induced pressure<br />
differential dissipating during this time.<br />
Figure 5-102 is a semilog plot <strong>of</strong> the Forty-niner<br />
pulse-test data, showing the best typecurve match<br />
achieved. The data and type curve match<br />
reasonably well, with the greatest discrepancy<br />
occurring at early time. The transmissivity calculated<br />
from this match is 2.2 x 10-4 ft2/day (Table 5-2).<br />
Figure 5-103 is a log-log plot <strong>of</strong> the DST FEU data,<br />
along with a simulation generated by INTERPRET.<br />
The simulation fit the data very well, and is<br />
representative <strong>of</strong> a single-porosity medium with a<br />
transmissivity <strong>of</strong> 5.3 x 10-3 ftz/day (Table 5-2).<br />
Assuming a porosity <strong>of</strong> 30%. a total-system<br />
compressibility <strong>of</strong> 1 .O x 10-5 psi-', and a fluid viscosity<br />
<strong>of</strong> 1.0 cp, the skin factor for this simulation is 0.7,<br />
indicating a wellbore with little damage. The decline<br />
in the pressure derivative at late time reflects minor<br />
overpressure-skin effects. The dimensionless<br />
Homer plot <strong>of</strong> the FBU data (Figure 5-104) shows an<br />
excellent fit between the data and the simulation<br />
using a static formation pressure estimate <strong>of</strong><br />
11 7.2 psia.<br />
J PULSE<br />
J<br />
/EQUILIBRATION<br />
PRESSURE ABOVE TEST INTERVAL<br />
-<br />
A.<br />
-- A<br />
I FBU \s~u<br />
-<br />
o k<br />
I<br />
10 ' I<br />
I I I I 20 In I I I 30 I<br />
I I I 40 ' I I I I I I 50 I I I 60 ' I<br />
FFL<br />
I I 70 a<br />
I<br />
b<br />
SFL<br />
3--<br />
SLUG<br />
00 I * uLu 90 I * 100<br />
124