25.10.2014 Views

Beauheim 1987 - Waste Isolation Pilot Plant - U.S. Department of ...

Beauheim 1987 - Waste Isolation Pilot Plant - U.S. Department of ...

Beauheim 1987 - Waste Isolation Pilot Plant - U.S. Department of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1 .o<br />

0.9<br />

0.8<br />

0.7<br />

1<br />

MATCH PARAMETERS<br />

- p' = 154.50 psi8<br />

pi = 52.86 psia<br />

-<br />

a = 10-8<br />

p =I<br />

0.6<br />

0<br />

5 0.5<br />

I<br />

0.4<br />

0.3<br />

0.2<br />

0.1<br />

0.0<br />

103 10-2 10' t 00 10'<br />

ELAPSED TIME, hours<br />

102<br />

Figure 5-58. H-l8/Culebra Slug-Test Plot<br />

5.2.2.10 WIPP-12. Two falling-head slug tests <strong>of</strong><br />

the Culebra were conducted at WIPP-12. The first<br />

test was initiated on December 22, <strong>1987</strong>, and the<br />

second test was initiated on Januaty 8, 1988. The<br />

fluid-pressure data from these tests will be reported<br />

in Stensrud et al. (in preparation). During each test,<br />

approximately 95% <strong>of</strong> the induced pressure<br />

differential was dissipated in 17 to 19 hr. The data<br />

from these periods fit the analytically derived type<br />

curves well. After 17 to 19 hr, however, the rates <strong>of</strong><br />

recovery slowed for an unknown reason, causing<br />

deviation <strong>of</strong> the data from the type curves. Inasmuch<br />

as the test recoveries were nearly complete when<br />

these deviations occurred and the analyses <strong>of</strong> the<br />

data collected before these deviations provided<br />

consistent results for the two tests, the late-time (Le.,<br />

after 17 to 19 hr) data were ignored during analysis.<br />

A semilog plot <strong>of</strong> the data from the first slug test,<br />

along with the best-fit type-curve match, are shown in<br />

Figure 5-59. This type-curve match provides a<br />

transmissivity estimate <strong>of</strong> 0.10 ftzlday for the Culebra<br />

at WIPP-12 (Table 5-3). The same type curve and a<br />

similar match were used to fit the data from the<br />

second test (Figure 5-60). The transmissivity<br />

estimate provided by this match is 9.7 x 10-2 ftz/day<br />

(Table 5-3), similar to that from the first test.<br />

5.2.2.1 1 WIPP-18. To evaluate the transmissivity<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Culebra at WIPP-18, a falling-head slug test<br />

lasting slightly over 46 hr was initiated on May 21,<br />

1986. The fluid-pressure data from this test are<br />

reported in Saulnier et al. (<strong>1987</strong>). About 95% <strong>of</strong> the<br />

induced pressure differential was dissipated during<br />

the test. Figure 5-61 shows a semilog plot <strong>of</strong> the<br />

falling-head slug-test data, along with the best-fit type<br />

curve. This fit provides a transmissivity estimate <strong>of</strong><br />

0.30 ft*/day (Table 5-3).<br />

5.2.2.12 WIPP-19. The transmissivity <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Culebra at WIPP-19 was evaluated by performing a<br />

falling-head slug test. The test was initiated on May<br />

31, 1986, and lasted approximately 94 hr. The fluidpressure<br />

data from this test are reported in Saulnier<br />

et al. (<strong>1987</strong>). About 98% <strong>of</strong> the induced pressure<br />

differential was dissipated during the test.<br />

90

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!