Beauheim 1987 - Waste Isolation Pilot Plant - U.S. Department of ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Ylf M (t -1wt 5 n nch REAMED BOREHOLE nch. 32.3 Iblfl WELL CASING lbinch HOLE 12.25-Inch REAMED BOREHOLE - 2.375-inch TUBING ::E:: MARKER BED 103 . z 2 UNIONANHc < -4n 207OIn MARKERBED’36 - Y 0 P < -I < Nu’n -,n COWDEN ANHYDRITE MEMBER 7.87Cinch REAMED BOREHOLE O.(IZHnch, 323 IWft WELL CASING BASK1 1.5-inch PACKER ANNULUSTRANSDUCER DRUCK PDCR YOID RVAL TRANSDUCER I-< t? P CEMENT PLUG ANHYDRITE Ih 0 BRIDGE PLUG ALL DEPTHS BELOW QROUWD WRFACE NOT TO SCALE BRIDGE PLUG ALL DEPTHS BELOW GROUND SURFACE NOT TO SCALE Figure 3-1 1. Well Configuration for WIPP-12 Castile and Salado Testing of a fault in that vicinity (Sandia and USGS, 1980a). WIPP-18 was drilled to a total depth of 1060 ft, 132 ft into the Salado Formation, and no evidence of a fault was found. WIPP-18 was abandoned in an open-hole condition filled with brine mud until October 1985, when the hole was recompleted to serve as a Culebra observation well. To this end, the hole was reamed to a diameter of 7.875 inches, and 5.5-inch casing was installed and cemented from the surface to a depth of 1050 ft. The Culebra interval was then shot-perforated from 784 to 806 ft deep, based on gamma-ray logging performed to locate the Culebra. Sandia and USGS (1980a) report the Culebra at WIPP-18 as being from 787 to 808 ft deep. The discrepancy in depths was probably caused by the 1978 and 1985 logging surveys using different datums to zero the tools. From May 10 to 14, 1986, WIPP-18 was developed by pumping and surging (Saulnier et al., 1987). For slug testing, a PIP was temporarily set in the well casing on 2.375-inch Figure 3-1 2. Well Configuration for WIPP-12 Culebra Slug Tests tubing from 769.7 to 774.0 ft. The configuration of the well at the time of testing is shown in Figure 3-13. 3.12 WIPP-19 WIPP-19 was drilled as part of the same program as WIPP-18 in 1978 (Sandia and USGS, 1980b). The hole was continuously cored to a total depth of 1038.2 ft, 143.2 ft into the Salado Formation. WIPP-19 was then abandoned in an open-hole condition filled with brine mud until October 1985, when the hole was recompleted to serve as a Culebra observation well. The borehole was reamed to a diameter of 7.875 inches, and 5.5-inch casing was installed and cemented from the surface to a depth of 1036.6 ft. The Culebra interval was then shot-perforated from 754 to 780 ft deep, based on gamma-ray logging performed to locate the Culebra. Sandia and USGS (1980b), by comparison, report the Culebra as being 756 to 779 ft deep. From May 28 to 28
3435.14 ff 1 2.375-inch TUBING 2.375-inch TUBING 5.5-inch, 15.5 Ibffi WELL CASING ANNULUS TRANSDUCER DRUCK PDCR 10fD 5.5-inch, 15.5 Ib/tI -.? WELLCASING 1 ANNULUS TRANSDI UCER DRUCK PDCR lOlD TEST-INTERVAL TRANSDUCER DRUCK PDCR 10ID 7 n75 .inch REAMED BOREHOLE LTEST-INTERVAL TRANSDUCER DRUCK PDCR 10fD BASK1 PACKER m.uz n 7.875-inch REAMED BOREHOLE CASING PERFORATIONS 784-806 n CULEBRA DOLOMITE 4 1 CASING PERFORATIONS 7 ~ - 7 ~ ) n 1036.6 n--! ALL DEPTHS BELOW GROUND SURFACE %-CEMENT NOT TO SCALE ALL DEPTHS BELOW GROUND SURFACE NOT TO SCALE Figure 3-13. Well Configuration for WIPP-18 Slug Test 29, 1986, the well was developed by pumping and surging (Saulnier et al., 1987). For slug testing, a PIP was temporarily set in the well casing from 737.5 to 741.8 ft on 2.375-inch tubing. The configuration of the well at the time of testing is shown in Figure 3-14. 3.13 WIPP-21 WIPP-21 was drilled as part of the same program as WIPP-18 and WIPP-19 in 1978 (Sandia and USGS, 1980~). The hole was drilled to a total depth of 1046 ft, 178 ft into the Salado Formation. WIPP-21 was then abandoned in an open-hole condition filled with brine mud until October 1985, when the hole was recompleted to serve as a Culebra observation well. The borehole was reamed to a diameter of 7.875 inches, and 5.5-inch casing was installed and Figure 3-14. Well Configuration for WIPP-19 Slug Test cemented from the surface to a depth of 1013.7 ft. The Culebra interval was then shot-perforated from 727 to 751 ft deep, based on gamma-ray logging performed to locate the Culebra. Sandia and USGS (1980~) report the Culebra lies 2 ft lower, from 729 to 753 ft deep, probably because of difference in the datums from which depths were measured. From June 28 to July 1, 1986, the well was developed by pumping and surging (Saulnier et al., 1987). For slug testing, a PIP was temporarily set in the well casing from 705.9 to 711.8 ft on 2.375-inch tubing. The configuration of the well at the time of testing is shown in Figure 3-15. 29
Page 1 and 2: SANDIA REPORT SAND87 -0039 UC - 70
Page 3 and 4: SAND87-0039 Unlimited Release Print
Page 5: a transmissivity of about 7 x 10-2
Page 8 and 9: 5 . TEST OBJECTIVES AND INTERPRETAT
Page 10 and 11: 3-18 3-19 3-20 3-21 3-22 3-23 3-24
Page 12 and 13: 5-35 H-l5/Culebra Drillstem and Slu
Page 14 and 15: 5-78 5-79 5-80 5-81 5-82 5-83 5-84
Page 16 and 17: A-2 A-3 A4 A-5 A-6 Single-Porosity
Page 18 and 19: 'H-6 o DOE-2 OHIPP-13 OAIPP 12 OH-1
Page 20 and 21: WlPP site. The aggregate thickness
Page 22 and 23: deep. The gamma-ray log used to gui
Page 24 and 25: 3347.11 ft \ - -12.25-inch HOLE -8.
Page 26 and 27: ~ 3409.6 n __ - - HOLOCENE DEPOSITS
Page 30 and 31: 3418.96 n 7.875-inch REAMED BOREHOL
Page 32 and 33: 2.375-inch TUBING 4.5-inch. 9.5 Ibl
Page 34 and 35: WELL CASING 2.375-inch TUBING TEST-
Page 36 and 37: 1.5-Inch GALVANIZED PIPE WELL CASIN
Page 38 and 39: I I I I PRE-TEST STATIC PRESSURE i/
Page 40 and 41: (or areal extent) of the aquifer on
Page 42 and 43: :7001 J EQUILIBRATION / r.. .......
Page 44 and 45: Once straddle tests proved impossib
Page 46 and 47: 1300 c - J PRE-TEST PRESSURE IN TES
Page 48 and 49: - < a m L: * m 3 L a I Start Date:
Page 50 and 51: uildups were caused by the natural
Page 52 and 53: TABLE 5-1 EFFECTIVE DST FLOW RATES
Page 54 and 55: TABLE 5-2 SUMMARY OF NON-CULEBRA SI
Page 56 and 57: simulation shown, however, uses a t
Page 58 and 59: 1 .o 0.9 0.8 p' = 79.08 paig pi = 6
Page 60 and 61: ~ ~~ TABLE 5-3 SUMMARY OF CULEBRA S
Page 62 and 63: Two factors raised questions about
Page 64 and 65: 102 I I 1 1 1 W K 3 v) v) W K n v)
Page 66 and 67: 5.2.2.21 below) and DOE-2 (Beauheim
Page 68 and 69: ..A 225 - PRESSURE ABOVE TEST INTER
Page 70 and 71: 10' n ui K 3 v) v) W a n v) v) 100
Page 72 and 73: 10' MATCH PARAMETERS O n w a 3 v) v
Page 74 and 75: ..CI__._._..__....__.I 5.2.2.6 H-15
Page 76 and 77: 8.0 1 I I I MATCH PARAMETERS AP 1.0
Page 78 and 79:
- 200 150 5 - EQUILIBRATION \Feu 'S
Page 80 and 81:
4.0 1 I 1 1 3.0 I n 2.0 1 .o 0.0 0.
Page 82 and 83:
1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0 0.5 0.4 0.3 0
Page 84 and 85:
3.0 .hl c El2 2.0 . v n I P 1 .o MA
Page 86 and 87:
EI€3- 0.9 "O I OOATA - TYPE CURVE
Page 88 and 89:
4.0 I I I 3.0 MATCH PARAMETERS AP =
Page 90 and 91:
1 .o 0.9 0.8 0.7 1 MATCH PARAMETERS
Page 92 and 93:
1 .o 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0 2 0.5 I 0.4
Page 94 and 95:
1.0, 0 I 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 MA
Page 96 and 97:
P-15 was bailed on four occasions i
Page 98 and 99:
1 .o 0.9 0.8 - p’ = 78.93 prig p,
Page 100 and 101:
Two type-curve matches are shown wi
Page 102 and 103:
0 5 I ELAPSED TIME. hours Figure 5-
Page 104 and 105:
10’ 1 I I I n a w 5 100 v) v) W a
Page 106 and 107:
MATCH PARAMETERS -ip 10 PSI 150 t 1
Page 108 and 109:
Considering that all other pumping
Page 110 and 111:
I ,EQUILIBRATION BUILDUP Elapsed Ti
Page 112 and 113:
0 9. w 10’ K =a 100 v) v) W a n v
Page 114 and 115:
10’ I I I a J P 100 v) v) W a n v
Page 116 and 117:
~ ~. SLUG t i /- i 3 Start Date 07
Page 118 and 119:
Figure 5-94 is a log-log plot of th
Page 120 and 121:
was followed by a 92-minute FBU. Th
Page 122 and 123:
10’ 1 1 1 1 a n w’ a = 100 v) v
Page 124 and 125:
and anhydrite, and were not conside
Page 126 and 127:
4.0 MATCH PARAMETERS .A. L. 21% 3.0
Page 128 and 129:
Estimates of the static formation p
Page 130 and 131:
10’ n w 2 100 v) v) w a P v) v) w
Page 132 and 133:
OWIPP-28. 70 OWIPP-27.650 OWIPP-30.
Page 134 and 135:
to Nash Draw where no halite is pre
Page 136 and 137:
observations regarding the potentia
Page 138 and 139:
7. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS Single-w
Page 140 and 141:
REFERENCES Bachman, G.O. 1984. Regi
Page 142 and 143:
INTERA Technologies, Inc. 1986. WlP
Page 144 and 145:
Stensrud, W.A.; Bame, M.A.; Lantr,
Page 146 and 147:
(A-4)
Page 148 and 149:
distinct value of Coe2s. Pressure-d
Page 150 and 151:
The wellbore storage coefficient is
Page 152 and 153:
where: n = number of normal sets of
Page 154 and 155:
(A-21) and for spherical blocks the
Page 156 and 157:
where: tp* = Vfq, V = total flow pr
Page 158 and 159:
Figure A-5. Semilog Slug-Test Type
Page 160 and 161:
A.4 INTERPRET WELL-TEST INTERPRETAT
Page 162 and 163:
DISTRIBUTION: U. S. Department of E
Page 164 and 165:
INTERA Technologies, Inc. (9) 6580
Page 166 and 167:
WlPP Public Reading Room Carlsbad M
Page 168 and 169:
Nationale Genossenschaft fur die La
show all

Beauheim 1987 - Waste Isolation Pilot Plant - U.S. Department of ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?