Beauheim 1987 - Waste Isolation Pilot Plant - U.S. Department of ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

WELL CASING 2.375-inch TUBING TEST-INTERVAL TRANSDUCER DRUCK PDCR lOlD BASKl 1.5-inch PACKER ANNULUS TRANSDUCER DRUCK PDCR lWD was temporarily set in the well casing from 492.2 to 494.8 ft deep on 2.375-inch tubing, and a minipacker was set in the tubing from 459.6 to 460.1 ft deep. The configuration of Cabin Baby-1 at the time of testing is shown in Figure 3-22. 15-lmh REAMED BOREHOLE 13.375-inch WELL CASING DRUCK PDCR lOlD TEST-INTERVAL TRANSDUCER DRUCK PDCR 101D BASKl 1.5-inch PACKER PRODUCTION-INJECTION BRIDGE PLUG ALL DEPTHS BELOW GROUND SURFACE NOT TO SCALE Figure 3-21. Well Configuration for ERDA-9 Slug Tests SING PERFORATIONS Formation. Tubing attached to the PIP provided access for Bell Canyon hydraulic-head measurements, while the annulus between the tubing and the borehole wall was open to the Castile and Salado Formations. ALL DEPTHS BELOW GROUND SURFACE BRIDGE PLUG NOT TO SCALE In September 1986, Cabin Baby-I was recompleted as a Culebra observation well. The PIP at the base of the Castile was replaced by a retrievable bridge plug, and another retrievable bridge plug was set in the well casing from about 585.4 to 588.4 ft deep. The casing was perforated between the depths of 503 and 529 ft, which coincides with the Culebra interval identified from a gamma-ray log run immediately before perforation (all Cabin Baby-I stratigraphic depths above the Salado reported in Beauheim et al. (1983) are incorrect). Following the recompletion, the well was developed between September 23 and October 3, 1986 by repeatedly pumping most of the water from the well and allowing the water level to recover. Additional recompletion and welldevelopment information is contained in Stensrud et al. (1987). To facilitate the 1987 slug testing, a PIP Figure 3-22. 3.21 DOE-I Well Configuration for Cabin Baby-I Slug Tests DOE-1 was drilled in July 1982 to investigate a structural anomaly in the Castile Formation inferred from seismic-reflection surveys, The well was drilled at a 14.75-inch diameter to a depth of 1122.5 ft, and 10.75-inch casing was set and cemented from about 11 18 ft to the surface. A 7.875-inch hole was then drilled to a total depth of about 4057 fi (Freeland, 1982). In March 1983, a retrievable bridge plug was set in the casing at a depth of about 858 ft, and an interval encompassing the Culebra from 820 to 843 ft deep was shot-perforated using 4 shotsfft (HydroGeoChem, 1985). The well was developed 34
ehnreen March 30 and April 29, 1983, by bailing and pumping using a pump jack. The configuration of DOE-I at the time of the 1983 pumping test is shown in Figure 3-23. 1 5-Inch GALVANIZED PIPE ?-inch. 17 (?) Ib/ft WELL CASING - 14.75-inch REAMED BOREHOLE 1.5-inch GALVANIZED PIPE 10.75-inch. 40.5 Ib/tI WELL CASING TEST-INTERVAL TRANSDUCER BELL 6 HOWELL CEC 0-1W Psi T-INTERVAL TRANSDUCERS L 6 HOWELL CEC 0-250 psi -- . TOTAL DEPTH - 00.3 n NOT ALL DEPTHS @ELOW GROUND SURFACE TO SCALE ALL DEPTHS BELOW GROUND SURFACE Figure 3-23. 3.22 Engle BRIDGE PLUG Well Configuration for DOE-I Pumping Test NOT TO SCALE The Engle well is a livestock-watering well equipped with a windmill. Little is known about the history of the Engle well. The following information was obtained from unpublished geophysical logs run in the Engle well by the USGS in November 1983. The well has a total depth of about 683 ft, and is cased with 7-inch casing from about 648 ft to the surface. The Culebra lies from 659 to 681 ft deep. The open hole through the Culebra appears to have been drilled to a ?-inch diameter, although a caliper log indicates that it has washed out or caved to an average diameter of about 7.4 inches. The configuration of the well during the November 1983 pumping test is shown in Figure 3-24. Figure 3-24. 3.23 Carper Well Configuration for Engle Pumping Test The Carper well is an oil test hole converted to a livestock-watering well equipped with a windmill. The well is in the northwest quarter of Section 7, Township 25 South, Range 30 East, in the Poker Lake area described by Borns and Shaffer (1985), among others. Cooper and Glanzman (1971) reported that the well was cased to 250 ft, and plugged at a depth of 385.6 ft. Recent measurements indicate that the casing has a 5.5-inch outside diameter. The production zone is reported by Cooper and Glanzman (1971) as being undifferentiated Quaternary and Tertiary deposits. Richey et al. (1985) refer to these deposits as Cenozoic alluvium. In March 1959, the depth to water was 263.3 ft. The static water level before the February 1984 pumping test was about 262.8 ft below ground surface. Figure 3-25 shows the configuration of the Carper well during the February 1984 pumping test. 35
Page 1 and 2: SANDIA REPORT SAND87 -0039 UC - 70
Page 3 and 4: SAND87-0039 Unlimited Release Print
Page 5: a transmissivity of about 7 x 10-2
Page 8 and 9: 5 . TEST OBJECTIVES AND INTERPRETAT
Page 10 and 11: 3-18 3-19 3-20 3-21 3-22 3-23 3-24
Page 12 and 13: 5-35 H-l5/Culebra Drillstem and Slu
Page 14 and 15: 5-78 5-79 5-80 5-81 5-82 5-83 5-84
Page 16 and 17: A-2 A-3 A4 A-5 A-6 Single-Porosity
Page 18 and 19: 'H-6 o DOE-2 OHIPP-13 OAIPP 12 OH-1
Page 20 and 21: WlPP site. The aggregate thickness
Page 22 and 23: deep. The gamma-ray log used to gui
Page 24 and 25: 3347.11 ft \ - -12.25-inch HOLE -8.
Page 26 and 27: ~ 3409.6 n __ - - HOLOCENE DEPOSITS
Page 28 and 29: Ylf M (t -1wt 5 n nch REAMED BOREHO
Page 30 and 31: 3418.96 n 7.875-inch REAMED BOREHOL
Page 32 and 33: 2.375-inch TUBING 4.5-inch. 9.5 Ibl
Page 36 and 37: 1.5-Inch GALVANIZED PIPE WELL CASIN
Page 38 and 39: I I I I PRE-TEST STATIC PRESSURE i/
Page 40 and 41: (or areal extent) of the aquifer on
Page 42 and 43: :7001 J EQUILIBRATION / r.. .......
Page 44 and 45: Once straddle tests proved impossib
Page 46 and 47: 1300 c - J PRE-TEST PRESSURE IN TES
Page 48 and 49: - < a m L: * m 3 L a I Start Date:
Page 50 and 51: uildups were caused by the natural
Page 52 and 53: TABLE 5-1 EFFECTIVE DST FLOW RATES
Page 54 and 55: TABLE 5-2 SUMMARY OF NON-CULEBRA SI
Page 56 and 57: simulation shown, however, uses a t
Page 58 and 59: 1 .o 0.9 0.8 p' = 79.08 paig pi = 6
Page 60 and 61: ~ ~~ TABLE 5-3 SUMMARY OF CULEBRA S
Page 62 and 63: Two factors raised questions about
Page 64 and 65: 102 I I 1 1 1 W K 3 v) v) W K n v)
Page 66 and 67: 5.2.2.21 below) and DOE-2 (Beauheim
Page 68 and 69: ..A 225 - PRESSURE ABOVE TEST INTER
Page 70 and 71: 10' n ui K 3 v) v) W a n v) v) 100
Page 72 and 73: 10' MATCH PARAMETERS O n w a 3 v) v
Page 74 and 75: ..CI__._._..__....__.I 5.2.2.6 H-15
Page 76 and 77: 8.0 1 I I I MATCH PARAMETERS AP 1.0
Page 78 and 79: - 200 150 5 - EQUILIBRATION \Feu 'S
Page 80 and 81: 4.0 1 I 1 1 3.0 I n 2.0 1 .o 0.0 0.
Page 82 and 83: 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0 0.5 0.4 0.3 0
Page 84 and 85:
3.0 .hl c El2 2.0 . v n I P 1 .o MA
Page 86 and 87:
EI€3- 0.9 "O I OOATA - TYPE CURVE
Page 88 and 89:
4.0 I I I 3.0 MATCH PARAMETERS AP =
Page 90 and 91:
1 .o 0.9 0.8 0.7 1 MATCH PARAMETERS
Page 92 and 93:
1 .o 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0 2 0.5 I 0.4
Page 94 and 95:
1.0, 0 I 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 MA
Page 96 and 97:
P-15 was bailed on four occasions i
Page 98 and 99:
1 .o 0.9 0.8 - p’ = 78.93 prig p,
Page 100 and 101:
Two type-curve matches are shown wi
Page 102 and 103:
0 5 I ELAPSED TIME. hours Figure 5-
Page 104 and 105:
10’ 1 I I I n a w 5 100 v) v) W a
Page 106 and 107:
MATCH PARAMETERS -ip 10 PSI 150 t 1
Page 108 and 109:
Considering that all other pumping
Page 110 and 111:
I ,EQUILIBRATION BUILDUP Elapsed Ti
Page 112 and 113:
0 9. w 10’ K =a 100 v) v) W a n v
Page 114 and 115:
10’ I I I a J P 100 v) v) W a n v
Page 116 and 117:
~ ~. SLUG t i /- i 3 Start Date 07
Page 118 and 119:
Figure 5-94 is a log-log plot of th
Page 120 and 121:
was followed by a 92-minute FBU. Th
Page 122 and 123:
10’ 1 1 1 1 a n w’ a = 100 v) v
Page 124 and 125:
and anhydrite, and were not conside
Page 126 and 127:
4.0 MATCH PARAMETERS .A. L. 21% 3.0
Page 128 and 129:
Estimates of the static formation p
Page 130 and 131:
10’ n w 2 100 v) v) w a P v) v) w
Page 132 and 133:
OWIPP-28. 70 OWIPP-27.650 OWIPP-30.
Page 134 and 135:
to Nash Draw where no halite is pre
Page 136 and 137:
observations regarding the potentia
Page 138 and 139:
7. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS Single-w
Page 140 and 141:
REFERENCES Bachman, G.O. 1984. Regi
Page 142 and 143:
INTERA Technologies, Inc. 1986. WlP
Page 144 and 145:
Stensrud, W.A.; Bame, M.A.; Lantr,
Page 146 and 147:
(A-4)
Page 148 and 149:
distinct value of Coe2s. Pressure-d
Page 150 and 151:
The wellbore storage coefficient is
Page 152 and 153:
where: n = number of normal sets of
Page 154 and 155:
(A-21) and for spherical blocks the
Page 156 and 157:
where: tp* = Vfq, V = total flow pr
Page 158 and 159:
Figure A-5. Semilog Slug-Test Type
Page 160 and 161:
A.4 INTERPRET WELL-TEST INTERPRETAT
Page 162 and 163:
DISTRIBUTION: U. S. Department of E
Page 164 and 165:
INTERA Technologies, Inc. (9) 6580
Page 166 and 167:
WlPP Public Reading Room Carlsbad M
Page 168 and 169:
Nationale Genossenschaft fur die La
show all

Beauheim 1987 - Waste Isolation Pilot Plant - U.S. Department of ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?