Beauheim 1987 - Waste Isolation Pilot Plant - U.S. Department of ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

8.0 1 I I I MATCH PARAMETERS AP 1.0 psi ".U + DATA - SIMULATION -2.0 I I 1 1 0.0 0.5 1 .o 1.5 2.0 2.5 DIMENSIONLESS SUPERPOSITION FUNCTION: FLOW PERIOD 3 Figure 5-37. H-l5/Culebra First Buildup Dimensionless Horner Plot with INTERPRET Simulation 10' 0 n w' a 3 v) v) W a n g 100 W A z 0 v) z W r P AP = 1.0 psi t = 1.0hr U PRESSURE DATA PO 0.09 * PRESSURE-DERIVATIVE DATA tDICo 730 - SIMULATIONS CoeZs = 3000 Pi = 69.0 psia lo-' I I I 100 10' 102 103 104 DIMENSIONLESS TIME GROUP, t,/C, Figure 5-38. H-1 Wulebra Second Buildup Log-Log Horner Plot with INTERPRET Simulation 76
6 4 .- h .L n *I 2 n . :I% MATCH PARAMETERS AP = 1.0 psi t = 1.0hr PO = 0.09 - !dC, -730 CDe2s = 3000 P' = 153.2 psia 0 + DATA - SIMULATION -2 0 1 2 3 DIMENSIONLESS SUPERPOSITION FUNCTION: FLOW PERIOD 7 Figure 5-39. H-1 5/Culebra Second Buildup Dimensionless Horner Plot with INTERPRET Simulation Figure 5-40 shows a semilog plot of the rising-head slug-test data, along with the best-fit type curve. This fit provides a transmissivity estimate of 0.10 ftz/day (Table 5-3), which is in reasonable agreement with the FBU and SBU results. The best slug-test fit was obtained by assuming that the pressure was recovering to a static value of 160.0 psia, indicating the continuing influence of the underpressure skin after the SBU. 5.2.2.7 H-16. Testing of the Culebra at H-16 was planned to provide transmissivity data necessary to model the response of the Culebra to the construction of the Air-Intake Shaft at the WIPP. The Culebra lies from 702.5 to 724.4 ft deep at H-16 (Figure 3-8). The interval tested extended from 696.5 ft to the then-bottom of the hole at 733.9 ft. Thus, in addition to the Culebra, the lower 6 ft of the Tamarisk and the upper 9.5 ft of the unnamed lower member were tested. With the exception of the lower 2.9 ft of the Tamarisk, these overlying and underlying intervals are composed of gypsum and claystone, respectively, and were not considered to have contributed significantly to the transmissivity measured during the Culebra testing. The lower 2.9 ft of the Tamarisk is composed of claystone, siltstone, and sandstone, and may have hydraulic properties similar to those of the underlying Culebra. Hydrologically, the Culebra and the lower Tamarisk probably behave as a single unit. All of the Culebra testing was performed on August 7, 1987, the day after the Culebra was cored. The testing consisted of two DST flow periods, two buildup periods, and a rising-head slug test (Figure 5-41). The FFL lasted about 17 minutes, and was followed by a 161-minute FEU. The SFL lasted about 24 minutes, and was followed by a 208-minute SBU. For analyses of the buildup data, the FFL was divided into two flow periods with rates of 0.731 and 0.500 gpm, and the SFL was divided into two flow periods with rates of 0.818 and 0.512 gpm (Table 5-1). The slug test lasted 162 minutes, by which time 93% of the induced pressure differential had dissipated. The data from these tests are presented in Stensrud et al. (1988). 77
Page 1 and 2:
SANDIA REPORT SAND87 -0039 UC - 70
Page 3 and 4:
SAND87-0039 Unlimited Release Print
Page 5:
a transmissivity of about 7 x 10-2
Page 8 and 9:
5 . TEST OBJECTIVES AND INTERPRETAT
Page 10 and 11:
3-18 3-19 3-20 3-21 3-22 3-23 3-24
Page 12 and 13:
5-35 H-l5/Culebra Drillstem and Slu
Page 14 and 15:
5-78 5-79 5-80 5-81 5-82 5-83 5-84
Page 16 and 17:
A-2 A-3 A4 A-5 A-6 Single-Porosity
Page 18 and 19:
'H-6 o DOE-2 OHIPP-13 OAIPP 12 OH-1
Page 20 and 21:
WlPP site. The aggregate thickness
Page 22 and 23:
deep. The gamma-ray log used to gui
Page 24 and 25:
3347.11 ft \ - -12.25-inch HOLE -8.
Page 26 and 27: ~ 3409.6 n __ - - HOLOCENE DEPOSITS
Page 28 and 29: Ylf M (t -1wt 5 n nch REAMED BOREHO
Page 30 and 31: 3418.96 n 7.875-inch REAMED BOREHOL
Page 32 and 33: 2.375-inch TUBING 4.5-inch. 9.5 Ibl
Page 34 and 35: WELL CASING 2.375-inch TUBING TEST-
Page 36 and 37: 1.5-Inch GALVANIZED PIPE WELL CASIN
Page 38 and 39: I I I I PRE-TEST STATIC PRESSURE i/
Page 40 and 41: (or areal extent) of the aquifer on
Page 42 and 43: :7001 J EQUILIBRATION / r.. .......
Page 44 and 45: Once straddle tests proved impossib
Page 46 and 47: 1300 c - J PRE-TEST PRESSURE IN TES
Page 48 and 49: - < a m L: * m 3 L a I Start Date:
Page 50 and 51: uildups were caused by the natural
Page 52 and 53: TABLE 5-1 EFFECTIVE DST FLOW RATES
Page 54 and 55: TABLE 5-2 SUMMARY OF NON-CULEBRA SI
Page 56 and 57: simulation shown, however, uses a t
Page 58 and 59: 1 .o 0.9 0.8 p' = 79.08 paig pi = 6
Page 60 and 61: ~ ~~ TABLE 5-3 SUMMARY OF CULEBRA S
Page 62 and 63: Two factors raised questions about
Page 64 and 65: 102 I I 1 1 1 W K 3 v) v) W K n v)
Page 66 and 67: 5.2.2.21 below) and DOE-2 (Beauheim
Page 68 and 69: ..A 225 - PRESSURE ABOVE TEST INTER
Page 70 and 71: 10' n ui K 3 v) v) W a n v) v) 100
Page 72 and 73: 10' MATCH PARAMETERS O n w a 3 v) v
Page 74 and 75: ..CI__._._..__....__.I 5.2.2.6 H-15
Page 78 and 79: - 200 150 5 - EQUILIBRATION \Feu 'S
Page 80 and 81: 4.0 1 I 1 1 3.0 I n 2.0 1 .o 0.0 0.
Page 82 and 83: 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0 0.5 0.4 0.3 0
Page 84 and 85: 3.0 .hl c El2 2.0 . v n I P 1 .o MA
Page 86 and 87: EI€3- 0.9 "O I OOATA - TYPE CURVE
Page 88 and 89: 4.0 I I I 3.0 MATCH PARAMETERS AP =
Page 90 and 91: 1 .o 0.9 0.8 0.7 1 MATCH PARAMETERS
Page 92 and 93: 1 .o 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0 2 0.5 I 0.4
Page 94 and 95: 1.0, 0 I 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 MA
Page 96 and 97: P-15 was bailed on four occasions i
Page 98 and 99: 1 .o 0.9 0.8 - p’ = 78.93 prig p,
Page 100 and 101: Two type-curve matches are shown wi
Page 102 and 103: 0 5 I ELAPSED TIME. hours Figure 5-
Page 104 and 105: 10’ 1 I I I n a w 5 100 v) v) W a
Page 106 and 107: MATCH PARAMETERS -ip 10 PSI 150 t 1
Page 108 and 109: Considering that all other pumping
Page 110 and 111: I ,EQUILIBRATION BUILDUP Elapsed Ti
Page 112 and 113: 0 9. w 10’ K =a 100 v) v) W a n v
Page 114 and 115: 10’ I I I a J P 100 v) v) W a n v
Page 116 and 117: ~ ~. SLUG t i /- i 3 Start Date 07
Page 118 and 119: Figure 5-94 is a log-log plot of th
Page 120 and 121: was followed by a 92-minute FBU. Th
Page 122 and 123: 10’ 1 1 1 1 a n w’ a = 100 v) v
Page 124 and 125: and anhydrite, and were not conside
Page 126 and 127:
4.0 MATCH PARAMETERS .A. L. 21% 3.0
Page 128 and 129:
Estimates of the static formation p
Page 130 and 131:
10’ n w 2 100 v) v) w a P v) v) w
Page 132 and 133:
OWIPP-28. 70 OWIPP-27.650 OWIPP-30.
Page 134 and 135:
to Nash Draw where no halite is pre
Page 136 and 137:
observations regarding the potentia
Page 138 and 139:
7. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS Single-w
Page 140 and 141:
REFERENCES Bachman, G.O. 1984. Regi
Page 142 and 143:
INTERA Technologies, Inc. 1986. WlP
Page 144 and 145:
Stensrud, W.A.; Bame, M.A.; Lantr,
Page 146 and 147:
(A-4)
Page 148 and 149:
distinct value of Coe2s. Pressure-d
Page 150 and 151:
The wellbore storage coefficient is
Page 152 and 153:
where: n = number of normal sets of
Page 154 and 155:
(A-21) and for spherical blocks the
Page 156 and 157:
where: tp* = Vfq, V = total flow pr
Page 158 and 159:
Figure A-5. Semilog Slug-Test Type
Page 160 and 161:
A.4 INTERPRET WELL-TEST INTERPRETAT
Page 162 and 163:
DISTRIBUTION: U. S. Department of E
Page 164 and 165:
INTERA Technologies, Inc. (9) 6580
Page 166 and 167:
WlPP Public Reading Room Carlsbad M
Page 168 and 169:
Nationale Genossenschaft fur die La
show all

Beauheim 1987 - Waste Isolation Pilot Plant - U.S. Department of ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?