26.11.2014 Views

Florida Seaport System Plan - SeaCIP

Florida Seaport System Plan - SeaCIP

Florida Seaport System Plan - SeaCIP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Florida</strong> <strong>Seaport</strong> <strong>System</strong> <strong>Plan</strong><br />

<strong>System</strong> Overview and Performance<br />

<strong>Florida</strong>’s 14 deepwater seaports represent a critical component of <strong>Florida</strong>’s<br />

multimodal transportation system, functioning as domestic and international<br />

trade gateways, regional economic engines, and major transportation hubs.<br />

<strong>Florida</strong>’s seaports handle a variety of traffic, including containerized and<br />

noncontainerized cargo as well cruise passengers.<br />

• Eleven of <strong>Florida</strong>’s 14 ports handle some combination of domestic,<br />

import, and export cargo, totaling over 104 million tons in fiscal year<br />

2008/2009. The Port of Tampa is the largest cargo seaport handling 36<br />

percent of the state’s total tonnage (see Figure ES.1).<br />

• Ten <strong>Florida</strong> seaports handle container traffic, totaling over 2.7 million<br />

twenty-foot equivalent units (TEUs) in fiscal year 2008/2009. The Port<br />

of Miami is the largest container port handling around 30 percent of all<br />

containers moving through <strong>Florida</strong> ports. Port Everglades and Port of<br />

Jacksonville follow; these three container ports make up nearly 87<br />

percent of all container movement (see Figure ES.2).<br />

• Seven of <strong>Florida</strong>’s seaports offer passenger service for single- and multiday<br />

cruises, totaling over 12.7 million passengers in fiscal year 2008/2009.<br />

Port of Miami is the largest home-based cruise port handling nearly a third<br />

of all cruise passenger in <strong>Florida</strong>. Port Canaveral and Port Everglades<br />

follow at a close second and third, respectively, with the three together<br />

representing nearly 83 percent of all cruise passengers (see Figure ES.3).<br />

Competitive Position of <strong>Florida</strong>’s <strong>Seaport</strong>s<br />

In general, <strong>Florida</strong>’s seaports are highly competitive with other seaports throughout<br />

the United States. At the state level, <strong>Florida</strong> is in the top five states for total<br />

waterborne tonnage and containers handled. This is due to its large consuming<br />

population and the presence of a well established and competitive system of<br />

seaports. As a State, <strong>Florida</strong> competes with other coastal trading states in the South<br />

Atlantic and Gulf, from Virginia to Texas. However, many vessels call at multiple<br />

ports within these ranges – Houston and Tampa, or Hampton Roads and Miami, for<br />

example. <strong>Florida</strong>’s ports compete most directly with ports between South Carolina<br />

and Alabama, a range within which most vessels will make only a single call.<br />

• <strong>Florida</strong>’s Atlantic coast ports are dominant with respect to cruise<br />

markets; competitive with respect to overall tonnage; and competitive<br />

but lagging with respect to containers. The Port of Savannah alone<br />

handles nearly as many containers as <strong>Florida</strong>’s ports combined.<br />

• <strong>Florida</strong>’s Gulf coast ports are dominant with respect to cruise markets,<br />

but handle around one-half the tonnage and one-third the TEUs of their<br />

competitors. The tonnage numbers are skewed by the fact that<br />

competitors include several huge coal and petroleum centers; and the<br />

TEU numbers should not be a concern because the absolute numbers<br />

are fairly small and this is a rapidly growing market for all Gulf ports.<br />

<strong>Florida</strong> Department of Transportation<br />

December 2010<br />

ES-5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!