01.01.2015 Views

Defence Forces Review 2008

Defence Forces Review 2008

Defence Forces Review 2008

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Defence</strong> <strong>Forces</strong> <strong>Review</strong> <strong>2008</strong><br />

to have been. With the military components, the problem did not arise as much and this<br />

was true in particular because of degree of cooperation which existed between the NATO<br />

led forces and UNOHR (and earlier between NATO and the EU). Cohesion is vital in the<br />

implementation of any peace agreement, but if there exists a situation where individuals or<br />

organisations are unable or unwilling to enter into a cohesive relationship, then problems<br />

inevitably arise to the detriment of everybody. Unfortunately there was quite a noticeable<br />

element of this in Bosnia and Herzegovina in the 1990’s. To an extent, part of the problem<br />

existed within the UN, where there were politically motivated people with views that were<br />

far too inflexible; the same was not true of the EU. A peace process is something that must<br />

be both flexible and pragmatic and those who wish to be effective must be able to recognise<br />

mistakes and more importantly they must be able to recognise the necessity to change their<br />

modus operandi without losing sight of the bigger picture. Unfortunately, the Sarajevo based<br />

non-military UN did not seem to have a compete grasp of the wider picture and sometimes<br />

adopted a somewhat naïve approach that did not help matters. Whistle stop tours are fine in<br />

countries accustomed to peace, but the travelling circus has no real place in an immediate post<br />

war situation, especially when the possibility of renewed conflict exists at all times and where<br />

a pragmatic approach is more often called for to ensure that this does not occur.<br />

While Bosnia and Herzegovina has been the focus of this article, one must remember that it is<br />

impossible to consider Bosnia and Herzegovina in isolation, as it formed part of Yugoslavia.<br />

Prior to the break-up of Yugoslavia the six republics that formed the Federal State had<br />

interacted for quite a long time. It may be feasible to examine other States in isolation, but this<br />

will not always give a clear picture. Yugoslavia was often pulled between centrist Serbia and<br />

Croatia which always aspired towards more autonomy and one must bear in mind that Serbia<br />

and Croatia were the major players in Yugoslavia. Bosnia and Herzegovina is something of<br />

a melting pot and it seems likely that international actors did not give sufficient credence to<br />

the nationalist aspirations of the ethnic groups within that State. While there is no doubt that<br />

the military aspects of the peace process in the country have worked, the political elements<br />

may only form a patina over the reality. Nationalist aspirations remain strong in Bosnia and<br />

Herzegovina and while I have noted in my various visits to the region in recent years that<br />

while there is an apparent stability, this may not represent the long term reality of the future of<br />

the country. Many would assert that an initial division of the country into three entities, rather<br />

than two might have been the better course. It may be that the international community have<br />

refused to look carefully at the reality and this may prove costly in the interim to long term.<br />

Prior to unrest in Kosovo, it might have been that Bosnia and Herzegovina could have<br />

plodded on for a sufficient time to allow for the inception of real stability. In <strong>2008</strong>, however,<br />

we have seen the recognition of a unilaterally declared independence for Kosovo. This<br />

‘independence’, if it gains momentum, will obviously lead to a division of Serbia with all the<br />

potential for subsequent unrest and even the possibility of conflict and almost certainly civil<br />

unrest. Serbia will not relinquish Kosovo easily and it may be argued that there may be a very<br />

good case for not supporting a division of Serbia. Regardless, however, of any arguments<br />

as to the advisability of dividing a European country and accepting the establishment of a<br />

new state that has no real historical basis, there is another potential consequence and this<br />

relates to Bosnia and Herzegovina. In that country, both Croats and Bosniacs (Muslims) are<br />

carefully watching for what will happen in Kosovo. From my own knowledge of the country,<br />

104

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!