Defence Forces Review 2008
Defence Forces Review 2008
Defence Forces Review 2008
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Defence</strong> <strong>Forces</strong> <strong>Review</strong> <strong>2008</strong><br />
Even his transfer from UNTSO in the Middle East had difficulties. The aircraft flying him<br />
to Africa broke down and arriving on 18 July he immediately objected to decisions already<br />
made by the UN political leadership which he felt were degrading his force’s ability to<br />
conduct military operations. So strongly did he feel about this that he threatened to resign<br />
on three separate occasions in the month following his arrival. The first occurred when<br />
Hammarskjold turned down a request for a larger force to implement the mandate. The second<br />
crisis erupted when von Horn discovered that all of his communications were being filtered<br />
through a civilian sieve before reaching their destination at UN Headquarters in New York.<br />
But the straw that nearly broke the camel’s back, and consequently was to cause morale and<br />
operational problems for the ONUC troops on the ground, was the political decision to return<br />
arms previously seized from ANC units in UN raids.<br />
Added to these complications was the increasingly erratic and hostile attitude of the Congolese<br />
government to ONUC forces. A state of martial law was declared in August with demands<br />
that all UN personnel, civil and military, carry ID and produce it on request to the Congolese<br />
authorities. While this could be interpreted as the fledgling state simply trying to assert its<br />
authority, it also seriously impeded the conduct of ONUC operations.<br />
Canadian staff officers at ONUC Headquarters reporting on the situation stated that ONUC<br />
was primarily a civilian organisation with a military component. Having started with a handful<br />
of UN officials under Bunche, and a small group of officers (mostly Canadian) borrowed<br />
from UNEF (United Nations Emergency Force) in Sinai and UNTSO, the organisation had<br />
mushroomed into an awesome establishment, but lacked cohesion, know-how and any real<br />
practical authority. The Canadians stated that “for weeks, civilians, officers and other ranks<br />
have been pouring in from all over the world; people who have little in common and who<br />
are tied by strings which prevent or restrict their use. This rapid expansion of HQ ONUC,<br />
seemingly without any plan, has resulted in most of the effort being directed at their own<br />
administration to the detriment of the 18,000 troops spread over a territory as large as<br />
the whole of Ontario but without its means of communications. This situation, together<br />
with an almost total lack of telephonic communication between offices and an impossible<br />
accommodation set up has caused intolerable delay, confusion and frustration right from the<br />
start and the end is not yet in sigh.”<br />
By late 1960, von Horn had fallen into ill health and had withdrawn more and more from<br />
operational decision-making. His senior staff officers were now despairing and in December<br />
von Horn returned to UNTSO when a new ONUC force commander was appointed to take his<br />
place - General Sean McKeown from Ireland 1 .<br />
While McKeown’s main problem was stabilising the Congo he also had the added difficulty<br />
associated with the politically sensitive nature of his planning staff. The officers a commanding<br />
general has to assist him are crucial in the formulation of strategy and implementation of<br />
policy. Staff officers are the general’s hands, eyes and ears and normally will have been<br />
assembled over a number of years. They are usually bright up-and-coming officers who,<br />
in addition to being professionally competent, will also be attuned to the personality and<br />
nuances of their commander. Such cohesion in times of stress can be the difference between<br />
operational success and tactical failure.<br />
26