gunduz-aktan-kitap-soyledikleri-ve-yazdiklari

SÖYLEDİKLERİ VE YAZDIKLARI
This confusion is further compounded, if a third party is
involved in the conflict. Right from the founding of the UN system,
indirect aggression of third parties bedeviled the member
countries. In the context of nuclear deterrence, externally
instigated internal conflicts replaced interstate wars. Since the UN
Charter did not have any provision directly dealing with this kind
of war, many countries exploited the loopholes of the Charter.
Some of them are excelled at it. Ethnic groups have become
instruments of this warfare. Armed bands trained, indoctrinated,
financed and commanded from neighbouring countries have
infiltrated other countries creating ostensibly internal conflicts.
Human rights circles rallied by their governments raised their voice
on violations allegedly committed by defending states. Yet, there
has always existed a political interest in fomenting this kind of
indirect aggression which can never be considered as an issue of
human rights.
At a time when decolonisation is completed, ideological
revolutionary movements became obsolete and peace negotiations
regarding occupations are underway, most of the remaining
internal disturbances fall within the category of indirect
aggression, the case of Turkey being one.
Thank you.
Gündüz Aktan
171