- Page 1 and 2:
CLUSTERS ARE INDIVIDUALS NGP NGP Cl
- Page 3 and 4:
CLUSTERS ARE INDIVIDUALS CREATING E
- Page 5 and 6:
TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
- Page 7 and 8:
INDEX OF TABLES Table 1: Benchmarki
- Page 9 and 10:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In economic and i
- Page 11 and 12:
1. INTRODUCTION In economic and inn
- Page 13 and 14:
There is an emerging consensus that
- Page 15 and 16:
DIMENSIONS INDICATORS Age of the cl
- Page 17 and 18:
2. RESULTS OF THE BENCHMARKING OF C
- Page 19 and 20:
2.2 CHARACTERISTICS OF CLUSTER MANA
- Page 21 and 22:
these clusters since the establishm
- Page 23 and 24:
2.2.5 FINANCING OF CLUSTER MANAGEME
- Page 25 and 26:
Age Share of clusters having initia
- Page 27 and 28:
Share of clusters with high appeara
- Page 29 and 30:
2.3.4 THE CHARACTERISTICS OF A CLUS
- Page 31 and 32:
Against the backdrop of the other k
- Page 33 and 34:
3. RESULTS OF THE BENCHMARKING OF C
- Page 35 and 36:
3.2 CHARACTERISTICS OF CLUSTER PR0G
- Page 37 and 38:
NAME OF THE PROGRAM ESTABLISHMENT O
- Page 39 and 40:
Cluster Offensive Bayern No Yes No
- Page 41 and 42:
and regular meetings between progra
- Page 43 and 44:
REGIONAL CLUSTER PROGRAM OSKE - CEN
- Page 45 and 46:
3.3 KEY FINDINGS The benchmarking o
- Page 47 and 48:
ment through Competence Networks Ge
- Page 49 and 50:
3.3.4 INTERNATIONALIZATION OF CLUST
- Page 51 and 52:
Programs that attach high relevance
- Page 53 and 54:
The rationale behind a more active,
- Page 55 and 56:
tool to support the further develop
- Page 57 and 58:
implementation) the following princ
- Page 59 and 60:
4. POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS Clusters
- Page 61 and 62:
THE AUTHORS THOMAS LÄMMER-GAMP is
- Page 63 and 64:
1. INTRODUCTION The benchmarking of
- Page 65 and 66:
2.1.1.3 Term of the Program, Financ
- Page 67 and 68:
INDICATORS Output Results Impact
- Page 69 and 70:
2.2.1.3 Term of the Program, Financ
- Page 71 and 72:
2.2.2 ZENTRALES INNOVATIONSPROGRAMM
- Page 73 and 74:
2.2.2.4 Instruments ZIM-NEMO provid
- Page 75 and 76:
2.2.3 CLUSTER OFFENSIVE BAYERN (BAV
- Page 77 and 78:
2.2.3.4 Instruments The key element
- Page 79 and 80:
With R&D programs 4 3 2 1 0 With bu
- Page 81 and 82: Coordination of activities through
- Page 83 and 84: 2.3 NORWAY 2.3.1 NORWEGIAN CENTRES
- Page 85 and 86: 2.3.1.3 Term of the Program, Financ
- Page 87 and 88: 2.3.1.6 Monitoring and evaluation s
- Page 89 and 90: Norway (SIVA) and the Research Coun
- Page 91 and 92: 2.3.2.4 Instruments Support for the
- Page 93 and 94: How important is the cluster progra
- Page 95 and 96: 2.4.1.3 Term of the Program, Financ
- Page 97 and 98: 2.4.1.6 Monitoring and evaluation s
- Page 99 and 100: 2.4.2 REGIONALT KLUSTERPROGRAM (REG
- Page 101 and 102: manner. Companies that were partner
- Page 103 and 104: 2.5 FINLAND 2.5.1 THE CENTRE OF EXP
- Page 105 and 106: Competence Cluster Centre of Expert
- Page 107 and 108: environments in order to lure inter
- Page 109 and 110: The coordination of the program wit
- Page 111 and 112: organizations. Technology, service
- Page 113 and 114: With R&D programs 4 3 2 1 0 With bu
- Page 115 and 116: 2.6.1.4 Instruments The program pro
- Page 117 and 118: With R&D programs 4 3 2 1 0 With bu
- Page 119 and 120: The program provides grant funding
- Page 121 and 122: 2.7 POLAND 2.7.1 POLISH CLUSTER SUP
- Page 123 and 124: Name of the program Operational Pro
- Page 125 and 126: 2.8 FRANCE 2.8.1 GRAPPE D’ENTREPR
- Page 127 and 128: How important is the cluster progra
- Page 129 and 130: 2.9.1.3 Term of the Program, Financ