Download PDF - Anchor Environmental
Download PDF - Anchor Environmental
Download PDF - Anchor Environmental
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Table 6-9. Estimated IUV for wildlife refuge for the wetland and Ramsar site<br />
2005 2006<br />
Wetland 68.5 76.8<br />
Ramsar site 33.4 45.5<br />
An attempt was made to assign indirect use values of wildlife refuge to the different land categories,<br />
based on their importance as wildlife refuge. While most wildlife resources are found in the southern<br />
part of the delta, the normally flooded areas and the panhandle ultimately determine the fate of wildlife<br />
species 8 , and therefore the weight of both areas is relatively high. Each category has been given a<br />
weight of 0.3, indicative of the fact that most wildlife would not survive without these areas. The other<br />
categories are considered to be equally important for wildlife and therefore have been given weights<br />
of 0.1333 each.<br />
Table 6-10. Indirect use value of delta wildlife by land category (Pula million; 2005).<br />
Land category area (km 2 ) Hunting value Eco tourism value total value<br />
1 water-pan handle 1,446 15.4 7.7 23.1<br />
2 normally flooded area 2,152 15.4 7.7 23.1<br />
3 seasonally flooded 2,328 6.8 3.4 10.2<br />
4 occasionally flooded 3,534 6.8 3.4 10.2<br />
5 rarely flooded 19,322 6.8 3.4 10.2<br />
Total 28,782 51.2 25.6 76.8<br />
Table 6-10 clearly shows that the panhandle and the normally flooded areas are most valuable for<br />
wildlife. The growth of the tourism sector is expected to lead to an increase in the indirect use value of<br />
the wetland’s wildlife. Assuming that tourism would be at par with hunting, the value would increase to<br />
P 48.8 million.<br />
6.3.5 Purification of water<br />
The environment has the natural ability to absorb some pollution without a cost to society (e.g. water<br />
treatment costs). Purification of water is therefore an indirect use value.<br />
The study looked primarily at wastewater generated by the domestic sector, businesses and<br />
government and in tourism camps.<br />
The population density in and around the wetland is very low. Most people live in Maun and in a<br />
cluster of villages in the panhandle. There are very few commercial sources of pollution. The use of<br />
pesticides and fertilisers in agriculture is minimal, and no significant industries that could cause<br />
significant pollution appear to occur in the Ramsar site. Villages and the growing number of tourist<br />
camps are probably the main sources of pollution.<br />
In order to value the water purification function, the types and amount of pollution were estimated<br />
together with the value their natural purification.<br />
Pollution sources and types<br />
Most villages have a water reticulation system which offers three forms of access to water: 1.<br />
standpipes in villages; 2. a water connection inside the yard; and 3. a house connection. Water from<br />
standpipes is free of charge, but households are charged for yard and house connections proportional<br />
to the monthly use. Due to rising living standards, private connections in the yard or house are<br />
increasing. According to the National Master Plan for Sanitation and Wastewater, only 26.8% of<br />
domestic water use is linked to waterborne sanitation, and only 10% of that is connected to the<br />
sewage system; ninety percent ends up in septic tanks and soak ways.<br />
7 Personal communication Dr. J. Perkins.<br />
64