31.01.2015 Views

Glossary of Data Variables for Fatal and accident causation ... - ERSO

Glossary of Data Variables for Fatal and accident causation ... - ERSO

Glossary of Data Variables for Fatal and accident causation ... - ERSO

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Manual For SafetyNet <strong>accident</strong> <strong>causation</strong> system (SNACS)<br />

phenotype then that is what s/he should do. If there is not enough in<strong>for</strong>mation,<br />

the investigator has to stick with a general phenotype.<br />

The general <strong>and</strong> specific phenotypes <strong>for</strong> SNACS are presented in the table<br />

below. A detailed description with definitions can be found in Appendix B.<br />

General phenotype<br />

Timing (A1)<br />

Duration (A2)<br />

Force/(power) (A3)<br />

Distance (A4)<br />

Speed (A5)<br />

Direction (A6)<br />

Object (A7)<br />

Sequence (A8)<br />

Specific phenotype<br />

Premature action (A1.1)<br />

Late action (A1.2)<br />

No action (A1.3)<br />

Prolonged action/movement (A2.1)<br />

Shortened action/movement (A2.2)<br />

Insufficient <strong>for</strong>ce (A3.1)<br />

Surplus <strong>for</strong>ce (A3.2)<br />

Prolonged distance (A4.1)<br />

Shortened distance (A4.2)<br />

Surplus speed (A5.1)<br />

Insufficient speed (A5.2)<br />

Incorrect direction (A6.1)<br />

Adjacent object (A7.1)<br />

Similar object (A7.2)<br />

Skipped action (A8.1)<br />

Repeated action (A8.2)<br />

Reversed action (A8.3)<br />

Extraneous action (A8.4)<br />

Figure 5: Phenotypes (critical events) <strong>for</strong> SNACS<br />

Some <strong>of</strong> the phenotypes are very closely related even though they are<br />

conceptually separated. Speed, Timing <strong>and</strong> Distance are <strong>for</strong> example closely<br />

related. This can cause certain problems. If <strong>for</strong> example a vehicle collides with<br />

an oncoming vehicle when overtaking, is this then a dysfunctional behaviour<br />

related to Speed (the overtaking vehicle was not fast enough to do the<br />

overtaking), Distance (the overtaking car did not have a long enough stretch <strong>of</strong><br />

free road to do the overtaking) or Timing (the overtaking vehicle begun it<br />

manoeuvre too late or too early) The answer to that question is that the<br />

investigator has to choose the phenotype that best describes the dysfunctional<br />

behaviour that precedes the <strong>accident</strong>, i.e. the phenotype that makes most<br />

sense given what the investigator knows about the <strong>accident</strong>.<br />

For the example above, although all three phenotypes are logically possible,<br />

quite likely one <strong>of</strong> them is more appropriate given the circumstances around the<br />

event. Let’s suppose that the overtake takes place at an uphill slope towards<br />

the crest, the speed limit is 110 km/h <strong>and</strong> the overtaker has a speed <strong>of</strong> 160<br />

Page 127 <strong>of</strong> 215

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!