Xenophon Paper 2 pdf - ICBSS
Xenophon Paper 2 pdf - ICBSS
Xenophon Paper 2 pdf - ICBSS
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
GREECE’S ENGAGEMENT WITH THE BLACK<br />
SEA ECONOMIC COOPERATION<br />
Panagiota Manoli<br />
Traditionally, Greece has been a persistent advocate of multilateralism in its immediate<br />
neighbourhood, seeing it as a means of maintaining political dialogue among countries<br />
with - frequently - bilateral disputes as well as a means of supporting regional economic<br />
development. It thus supported regional dialogue even during the Cold War period 1<br />
while today it participates in all regional fora and initiatives in its neighbourhood (BSEC,<br />
SECI, Adriatic Initiative, etc.).<br />
Given the instability that surfaced in its northern borders in the early 1990s and following<br />
the end of the Cold War, the Balkans was placed as the first priority in Greek foreign<br />
policy. It was only after 1995 that the country became more active in its broader<br />
neighbourhood particularly in the Black Sea area. Another turning point in the Greek<br />
foreign policy towards the Black Sea region has been the year 2004 when Greece<br />
undertook the periodic Chairmanship of the Organisation of the Black Sea Economic<br />
Cooperation (BSEC) and embarked upon a process of bringing the BSEC and the<br />
European Union (EU) closer. The enlargement of the EU eastwards with Bulgaria and<br />
Romania motivated Greece as an EU member state to develop a more comprehensive<br />
Black Sea policy and to upgrade its engagement with the region.<br />
From reluctance to active engagement<br />
Though Greece was one of the founding fathers of the BSEC in 1992 it did not show<br />
great enthusiasm at the early stages of the initiative. Its position vis-à-vis the BSEC<br />
changed from ‘reluctance’ to that of ‘active engagement’.<br />
Greece viewed the initial efforts to establish the BSEC with suspicion. 2 Turkey’s active<br />
interest in promoting the idea in 1990-91 was seen as a diversion from a more Europeoriented<br />
Balkan cooperation scheme. Indeed, Meetings of Ministers of Foreign Affairs<br />
of the Balkan countries regularly took place during these same years, Albania joined<br />
1 For Regional Cooperation in the Balkans during the Cold War period see Walden, Sotiris (1994), Balkan<br />
Cooperation and European Integration [μ·ÏηÓÈ΋ ˘ÓÂÚÁ·Û›· Î·È ∂˘Úˆapple·˚΋ OÏÔÎÏ‹ÚˆÛË], Papazisis, Athens.<br />
2 Kazakos, Panos (1994), OÈÎÔÓÔÌÈ΋ ˘ÓÂÚÁ·Û›· ª·‡Ú˘ £¿Ï·ÛÛ·˜’, ∞Ó·appleÙ˘ÍȷΤ˜ ¢˘Ó·ÙfiÙËÙ˜ Î·È OÈÎÔ-<br />
ÓÔÌÈ΋ ˘ÓÂÚÁ·Û›· ÛÙË ¡ÔÙÈÔ·Ó·ÙÔÏÈ΋ ∂˘ÚÒappleË (μ·ÏηÓÈ΋), [‘Black Sea Economic Cooperation’, Development<br />
Potential and Economic Cooperation in Southeast Europe (Balkans)], vol. A, University of Athens, Athens,<br />
December, pp. 168-202.<br />
X E N O P H O N P A P E R no 2 67