Xenophon Paper 2 pdf - ICBSS
Xenophon Paper 2 pdf - ICBSS
Xenophon Paper 2 pdf - ICBSS
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
INTRODUCTION<br />
Panagiota Manoli<br />
This <strong>Xenophon</strong> <strong>Paper</strong> titled “Unfolding the Black Sea Economic Cooperation: Views<br />
from the Region” is the product of collective work and reflection by researchers from<br />
the Black Sea region.<br />
The Black Sea is often cited as the cradle of civilisations, a bridge between East and<br />
West, a land rich in cultural diversity. Most literature focuses on the historical and cultural<br />
elements of the Black Sea countries while current international relations writings mostly<br />
refer to the ‘frozen’ conflicts that represent the greatest challenge to the future development<br />
of the region.<br />
This publication looks towards another direction by focusing on the possibilities of<br />
‘cooperation’ and region building. It thus represents an effort to cast some light on the<br />
efforts to enhance intra-regional links and forge a new regional structure: the Black Sea<br />
Economic Cooperation (BSEC).<br />
The BSEC’s mission according to its Charter is ‘to promote a lasting and closer cooperation<br />
among the states of the BSEC region’. 1 Though a post Cold War structure, the BSEC<br />
has roots in the early 1990s, i.e. prior to the disintegration of the Soviet Union. The idea<br />
belonged originally to the Turkish ambassador to the United States Sukru Elekdag, who<br />
announced this project for the first time during a panel discussion organised in Istanbul<br />
in January 1990. 2<br />
The convergence of the ideology between the Turkish and Russian leadership in 1991<br />
set the grounds for the emergence of the BSEC as an initiative. The creation of a tool<br />
to facilitate economic interaction around the Black Sea along the lines of economic and<br />
political liberalism was advocated by both sides. The idea was soon embraced by all<br />
littoral states and states beyond the Black Sea that shared economic and political<br />
interests (Albania, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bulgaria, Georgia, Greece, Moldova, Romania<br />
and Ukraine). Especially in the 1990s the high degree of diversity – in terms of the level<br />
of economic development, market size, population, etc. – of the then eleven member<br />
states (Serbia joined later in 2004) of the BSEC undermined the common identity of the<br />
new structure.<br />
1 BSEC (1998), Charter of the Organisation of the Black Sea Economic Cooperation, preamble, para. 6, Yalta, 5<br />
June. Text available on http://www.bsec-organization.org.<br />
2 On the conceptualisation of the BSEC see Manoli, Panagiota (2004), The formation of the Black Sea Economic<br />
Cooperation: A Case Study of Subregionalism, PhD dissertation, University of Warwick.<br />
X E N O P H O N P A P E R no 2 7