28.02.2015 Views

Exchange Rate Economics: Theories and Evidence

Exchange Rate Economics: Theories and Evidence

Exchange Rate Economics: Theories and Evidence

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The flexible price monetary approach 101<br />

The consolidated budget constraint may be obtained by equating (4.18) with (4.19):<br />

c yt + q t c y ∗<br />

t<br />

+ e t ω yt + et ∗ ω yt ∗ = ω yt−1 (y t + e t ) + ω y ∗<br />

t−1<br />

(q t yt ∗ + et ∗ ). (4.20)<br />

Maximising equation (4.15) subject to the consolidated budget constraint for the<br />

home country yields a st<strong>and</strong>ard consumption Euler equation of the form:<br />

q t = u∗ c t<br />

u ct<br />

. (4.21)<br />

Equation (4.21) relates the relative price of the two goods to their marginal rate of<br />

substitution (where u ct is the marginal utility of consumption of the y good <strong>and</strong> u ∗ c t<br />

is the corresponding marginal utility of y ∗ consumption). 4 A st<strong>and</strong>ard implication<br />

of this kind of first order condition is that if the agent is behaving optimally then<br />

a reallocation of x units C for C ∗ should not result in any change to total utility.<br />

Similar first order conditions (not reported here) also hold for domestic holdings<br />

of home <strong>and</strong> foreign equity,<strong>and</strong> a similar set of first-order conditions are assumed<br />

to hold for the foreign country as well.<br />

Following Mark (2001) the use of an explicit form of the utility function makes<br />

the result in (4.21) more concrete. In particular,if the period utility function is<br />

assumed to be of the constant relative risk aversion (CRRA) form:<br />

u(C, C ∗ ) = X 1−γ<br />

t<br />

1 − γ ,(4.22)<br />

) equa-<br />

where X is a Cobb–Douglas index of the two goods (X t<br />

tion (4.22) can be rewritten as<br />

= C θ<br />

t Ct<br />

∗1−θ<br />

q t = 1 − θ<br />

θ<br />

y θ−1<br />

t<br />

(y ∗ t ) −θ (4.23)<br />

<strong>and</strong> by dividing the numerator <strong>and</strong> denominator by (θ − 1) we get<br />

q t = 1 − θ<br />

θ<br />

y t<br />

yt<br />

∗<br />

,(4.23 ′ )<br />

which indicates that in the barter economy the real exchange rate is determined<br />

by relative output levels.<br />

4.3.1.1 Introduction of a cash-in-advance constraint into the barter model<br />

Money can be introduced into this model by assuming a so-called cash-in-advance<br />

constraint; that is,agents are required to use money for the purchase of goods (an<br />

alternative way to get money into this class of model is through the utility function<br />

<strong>and</strong> this kind of model is considered in some detail in Chapters 10 <strong>and</strong> 11). In the<br />

Lucas (1982) model the cash-in-advance constraint means that consumers have to

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!