28.02.2015 Views

Exchange Rate Economics: Theories and Evidence

Exchange Rate Economics: Theories and Evidence

Exchange Rate Economics: Theories and Evidence

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

monies are:<br />

The flexible price monetary approach 103<br />

M = m 1 + m 2 ,(4.27)<br />

M ∗ = m ∗ 1 + m∗ 2 ,(4.27′ )<br />

where m 2 <strong>and</strong> m2 ∗ are,respectively,the foreign country holdings of domestic <strong>and</strong><br />

foreign money. These adding-up constraints,combined with the binding cash-inadvance<br />

constraints,imply a unitary velocity of money in each country:<br />

<strong>and</strong><br />

M t = P t y t (4.28)<br />

M ∗<br />

t<br />

= P ∗<br />

t y ∗ t (4.28 ′ )<br />

using (4.28) in (4.26) we obtain:<br />

S t M ∗<br />

t<br />

M t<br />

y t<br />

yt<br />

∗<br />

= u∗ c t<br />

u ct<br />

,(4.29)<br />

<strong>and</strong> on rearranging this equation we may get an expression for the nominal<br />

exchange rate as:<br />

S t = u∗ c t<br />

M t yt<br />

∗<br />

u ct Mt<br />

∗ . (4.30)<br />

y t<br />

As in the flex-price monetary model,we see that the nominal exchange rate is here<br />

determined by relative money supplies <strong>and</strong> output,but in contrast to the FLMA,<br />

the exchange rate now depends on marginal utilities (preferences) <strong>and</strong> does not<br />

explicitly depend on future expectations (although they could be brought in). As<br />

Stockman (1980) notes,the fact that the exchange rate depends here on marginal<br />

utilities can have an important bearing on underst<strong>and</strong>ing exchange rate behaviour,<br />

particularly the behaviour of the real exchange rate. To illustrate this,we consider<br />

an example from Stockman (1980).<br />

In Figure 4.1 we have an initial equilibrium at point A. Some exogenous<br />

shock then occurs which alters the home <strong>and</strong> foreign endowments to y 2 <strong>and</strong> y2 ∗,<br />

respectively. Given nominal money supplies,the new price levels will be determined<br />

by M /y 2 <strong>and</strong> M ∗ /y2 ∗ ,respectively. Suppose at the old nominal exchange<br />

rate this results in a relative price P 2 /SP2<br />

∗ given by ll in Figure 4.1. Clearly,<br />

the highest indifference curve that can be reached at B is U. If the exchange<br />

rate stayed unchanged the representative agent would attempt to move along<br />

ll to a preferred position by buying less of the home good <strong>and</strong> more of the<br />

foreign good. This process will result in the representative agent in the home<br />

country increasing their dem<strong>and</strong> for foreign exchange <strong>and</strong> those in the foreign<br />

country decreasing their dem<strong>and</strong> for foreign exchange. This process will<br />

result in a change in export prices <strong>and</strong> the nominal exchange rate until the real

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!