28.02.2015 Views

Exchange Rate Economics: Theories and Evidence

Exchange Rate Economics: Theories and Evidence

Exchange Rate Economics: Theories and Evidence

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The new open economy macroeconomics part 1 271<br />

By combining (10.72) <strong>and</strong> (10.73) the steady-state change in tradables consumption<br />

as a function of the steady-state change in the relative price of non-traded goods<br />

in terms of traded goods is:<br />

[<br />

]<br />

C T ′ = (σ − θ)γ<br />

θ + (P N ′ 1 + σ<br />

− P T ′ ). (10.74)<br />

In the short-run with sticky prices non-traded production is driven purely by the<br />

level of dem<strong>and</strong> as given by (10.66):<br />

ŷ N = Ĉ N = θ ˆP T + Ĉ T . (10.75)<br />

The short-run <strong>and</strong> steady-state monetary equilibrium conditions may be derived<br />

from a log-linearised variant of (10.67):<br />

ε(M ′ − ˆp) = θ σ<br />

[<br />

ˆP T − ˆP]<br />

+ 1 σ ĈT − 1 r (P ′ T − ˆP T ),(10.76)<br />

ε(M ′ − P ′ ) = θ σ<br />

[<br />

P<br />

′<br />

T − P ′] + 1 σ C ′ T . (10.77)<br />

Equations (10.70) to (10.77) can be used to solve both the short-run <strong>and</strong> steady-state<br />

effects of an unanticipated monetary surprise,which are:<br />

ˆp T = β 1 M ′ (10.78)<br />

P ′ T = β 2M ′ ,(10.79)<br />

ŷ N = Ĉ N = β 3 M ′ ,(10.80)<br />

y ′ N = C ′ N =−β 4(σ − θ) 2 M ′ ,(10.81)<br />

Ĉ T = β 5 (σ − θ)M ′ ,(10.82)<br />

C T ′ =−β 6(σ − θ)<br />

M ′ ,(10.83)<br />

r<br />

P N ′ − P T ′ =−β 7(σ − θ)M ′ ,(10.84)<br />

where the reduced form parameters, β 1 , β 2 , β 3 , β 4 , β 5 , β 6 , β 7 > 0,are a function<br />

of the underlying structural parameters. We are now ready to analyse the effect of<br />

divergences in the inter- <strong>and</strong> intra-elasticities of substitution on the current account.<br />

In the ‘base-line’ case where σ = θ,a positive monetary shock results in an<br />

expansion in the nontraded sector (equation (10.80)) <strong>and</strong> the price of traded goods<br />

rises in both the short- <strong>and</strong> long-run (equations (10.78) <strong>and</strong> (10.79)). With the two<br />

elasticities cancelling out by assumption,there can be no spillover to consumption<br />

in the traded sector (from (10.82) <strong>and</strong> (10.83)) <strong>and</strong> so the current account must<br />

stay in balance. As in the base-line case,when σ > θ the monetary stimulus<br />

will raise short-run production of the non-traded good <strong>and</strong> produce a rise in the<br />

price of the traded good (which by assumption represents a nominal depreciation).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!