28.02.2015 Views

Exchange Rate Economics: Theories and Evidence

Exchange Rate Economics: Theories and Evidence

Exchange Rate Economics: Theories and Evidence

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Purchasing power parity <strong>and</strong> the PPP puzzle 59<br />

the null of a unit root. The span may also be increased by holding T constant <strong>and</strong><br />

increasing N . We now consider each of these alternatives.<br />

2.4.1.1 Increasing NT by increasing T: long time span studies<br />

A number of researchers (see,for example,Frankel 1986,1988; Edison 1987;<br />

Abuaf <strong>and</strong> Jorion 1990; Grilli <strong>and</strong> Kaminsky 1991; Lothian <strong>and</strong> Taylor 1995)<br />

have implemented a real exchange rate unit root test using approximately 100<br />

years of annual data. In contrast to comparable tests for the recent floating period,<br />

these tests report evidence of significant mean reversion,with the average half-life<br />

across these studies being around 4 years. Diebold et al. (1991) also use long time<br />

spans of annual data,ranging from 74 to 123 years,to analyse the real exchange<br />

rates of six countries. In contrast to other long time span studies,the authors<br />

use long memory models to capture fractional integration processes. They find<br />

considerable evidence that PPP holds as a long-run concept <strong>and</strong> report a typical<br />

half-life of 3 years.<br />

As an alternative to examining the time series properties of real exchange rates,<br />

some long-run studies have examined the nominal exchange rate/relative price<br />

relationship <strong>and</strong> find that homogeneity restrictions hold,although the implied<br />

half-life is longer than that recovered from real exchange rate autoregressions. For<br />

example,Edison (1987) uses annual data on the UK pound–US dollar exchange<br />

rate over the period 1890–1978 <strong>and</strong> reports the following error correction model:<br />

s t = 0.135<br />

(0.08) + 0.756<br />

(0.17) [(p − p∗ ) t ]−0.086<br />

(0.04) (s − p − p∗ ) t−1 . (2.29)<br />

where st<strong>and</strong>ard errors are in parenthesis. The coefficient on the change in relative<br />

prices is insignificantly different from unity <strong>and</strong> the coefficient on the error correction<br />

term indicates that approximately 9% of the PPP gap is closed each year,<br />

implying a half-life of 7 years.<br />

Although studies which extend the span by increasing T are obviously interesting,they<br />

are not without their own specific problems since the basket used to<br />

construct the price indices is likely to be very different at the beginning <strong>and</strong> end<br />

of the sample period. This may be viewed as the temporal analogue to the spatial<br />

problem that arises in comparing price indices at a particular point in time <strong>and</strong><br />

makes the interpretation of the results difficult. Also,such studies suffer from spanning<br />

both fixed <strong>and</strong> flexible rate regimes with the inclusion of data from the former<br />

regime making mean reversion more likely. Additionally,Froot <strong>and</strong> Rogoff (1995)<br />

raise the problem of ‘survivorship’,or sample selection,bias in these studies. Such<br />

bias arises because the countries for which very long spans of data are available are<br />

countries which have been wealthy for relatively long periods of time <strong>and</strong> are more<br />

likely to produce evidence in favour of PPP because their relative price of nontraded<br />

goods have not changed that much. Countries which only comparatively<br />

recently became wealthy (such as Japan) or countries which were once wealthy but<br />

are no longer (such as Argentina) have not featured in the studies mentioned earlier.<br />

However,such countries are more likely to produce a violation of PPP over

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!