28.02.2015 Views

Exchange Rate Economics: Theories and Evidence

Exchange Rate Economics: Theories and Evidence

Exchange Rate Economics: Theories and Evidence

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Currency substitution <strong>and</strong> portfolio balance models 167<br />

exchange controls in the post-Bretton Woods period by most of the participating<br />

members of the generalized float.<br />

The kind of currency substitution referred to above,where agents hold a basket<br />

of home <strong>and</strong> foreign currencies <strong>and</strong> switch between these currencies in response to<br />

expected currency movements,is usually referred to as direct currency substitution.<br />

In practice it is likely that only a small proportion of a country’s non-interestbearing<br />

money stock would be held by non-nationals. 4 Before considering models<br />

which seek to model this kind of direct CS,it is worth noting that an indirect form<br />

of CS,which is closely related to the more familiar concept of capital mobility,may<br />

quantitatively be more important than direct capital mobility. Thus,expectations<br />

of an exchange rate change will induce substitution between non-money assets,<br />

such as bonds,<strong>and</strong> this will result in a form of currency substitution. This indirect<br />

form of CS may be illustrated with the following example from McKinnon (1982).<br />

For example,assume that the world consists of two countries,home <strong>and</strong> foreign,<br />

<strong>and</strong> uncovered interest parity is maintained between their non-money assets.<br />

i − i ∗ =ṡ e ,(7.1)<br />

The two countries are assumed to have issued bonds,V,<strong>and</strong> the interest rates in<br />

each country are determined as:<br />

i = i w + (1 − a)ṡ e ,(7.2)<br />

i ∗ = i w − aṡ e ,(7.3)<br />

where i w is the nominal world yield on bonds <strong>and</strong> is given by:<br />

i w = ai + (1 − a)i ∗ ,<br />

where a is the financial weight of the home country (in this case the US) in the world<br />

financial markets as measured by the ratio of dollar to total bonds outst<strong>and</strong>ing –<br />

a = V/V ∗ .Ifa is assumed to be,say,0.5 <strong>and</strong> s is the home currency price of<br />

foreign currency then an expected depreciation of the home currency of 10%<br />

will result in an increase in the home rate relative to the world rate of 5% <strong>and</strong> a<br />

reduction in the foreign rate of 5%. If expectations are commonly held,significant<br />

capital flows need not take place since the rates will adjust immediately to eliminate<br />

arbitrage incentives. However,the higher (lower) interest rate in the home (foreign)<br />

country results in agents holding less home currency <strong>and</strong> more foreign currency.<br />

To put this differently,the capital outflow from the home to foreign country is an<br />

exact reflection of the reduced dem<strong>and</strong> for the cash of the home country <strong>and</strong> the<br />

increased dem<strong>and</strong> for the cash of the foreign country. McKinnon (1982) argues that<br />

quantitatively this indirect form of currency substitution may be more important<br />

than the direct form of currency substitution: ‘Massive capital flows can easily be<br />

induced even when the interest differential remains “correctly” aligned to reflect<br />

accurately the change in expected exchange depreciation.’ 5 Although indirect CS<br />

may be the more important form of CS,it would clearly be impossible to distinguish<br />

it from ordinary capital mobility.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!