28.02.2015 Views

Exchange Rate Economics: Theories and Evidence

Exchange Rate Economics: Theories and Evidence

Exchange Rate Economics: Theories and Evidence

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Currency substitution <strong>and</strong> portfolio balance models 179<br />

a portfolio of non-money assets,the proportions of particular assets held depending<br />

on risk/return factors. This implies that uncovered interest parity will not hold <strong>and</strong><br />

should instead be replaced with a risk-adjusted version,such as:<br />

i t − i ∗ t − s e t+k = λ t (7.36)<br />

where λ t is a risk premium. In this context if international investors decide that a<br />

currency has become riskier,they are likely to reallocate their bond portfolios in<br />

favour of less risky assets.<br />

7.3.1 The portfolio balance model<br />

The asset sector of our small country portfolio balance model is outlined as<br />

equations (7.37) to (7.40):<br />

W = M + B + SF ,(7.37)<br />

where M denotes domestic money, B,domestic bonds,<strong>and</strong>,F ,<strong>and</strong> foreign bonds.<br />

Since the bonds are assumed to be very short term assets,rather than Consols,we<br />

do not need to consider capital gains or losses induced by interest rate changes.<br />

Dem<strong>and</strong> for the three assets depends upon the domestic <strong>and</strong> foreign rate of<br />

interest,which are assumed to be exogenously given,<strong>and</strong> are homogenous of<br />

degree 1 in normal wealth: 11<br />

M = m(i, i ∗ + s e )W , m i < 0, m i ∗ +s e < 0,(7.38)<br />

B = b(i, i ∗ + s e )W , b i > 0, b i ∗ +s e < 0,(7.39)<br />

SF = f (i, i ∗ + s e )W , f i < 0, f i ∗ +se > 0. (7.40)<br />

The partial derivatives in (7.38) to (7.40) indicate that for any asset an increase in<br />

the own rate leads to an increase in dem<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> an increase in a cross rate leads<br />

to a decrease in dem<strong>and</strong>. It is also assumed that the bonds are gross substitutes (i.e.<br />

b i > f i <strong>and</strong> f i ∗ +s e > b i ∗ +s e ) <strong>and</strong> a greater proportion of any increase in domestic<br />

wealth is held in domestic bonds rather than foreign bonds. To simplify the analysis,<br />

the asset dem<strong>and</strong> equations are not dependent upon income. As Allen <strong>and</strong> Kenen<br />

(1980) point out,this introduces an important asymmetry into a portfolio balance<br />

model,namely that while conditions in goods markets do not have a direct effect<br />

on asset markets,asset market conditions directly affect goods markets since the<br />

exchange rate, S,features in both sectors. Although domestic residents can hold<br />

all three assets,foreign residents can only hold foreign bonds (<strong>and</strong> presumably also<br />

foreign money which is non-traded). As in our CS models the only way residents<br />

of the small country can accumulate F is by running a current account surplus<br />

(which as we shall see below,equals positive savings). The supplies of both M <strong>and</strong><br />

B are exogenously given by the authorities.<br />

The real sector of the model is described by equations (7.41) <strong>and</strong> (7.44) <strong>and</strong><br />

is identical in specification to the real sector of the CS,model 2,in the previous

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!