28.02.2015 Views

Exchange Rate Economics: Theories and Evidence

Exchange Rate Economics: Theories and Evidence

Exchange Rate Economics: Theories and Evidence

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

210 Real exchange rate determination<br />

8.2.4 Tests of the EERM<br />

Based on the EERM model of Mussa (1984),discussed earlier,Faruqee (1995) uses<br />

the cointegration methods of Johansen to estimate equilibrium real exchange rate<br />

equations for the US <strong>and</strong> Japan. The real exchange rate used is the CPI-based real<br />

effective exchange rate <strong>and</strong> the conditioning variables are net foreign assets as a<br />

proportion of GNP,an index of the terms of trade. Two measures of productivity<br />

were additionally used as conditioning variables. They are the relative price of<br />

traded to non-traded goods,TNT,<strong>and</strong> comparative measure of labour productivity,PROD.<br />

Clear evidence of at least on cointegration is reported for both the US<br />

<strong>and</strong> Japanese systems. Focusing on the first significant vector the following result<br />

is obtained for the US:<br />

REER t = 1.47nfa t + 0.91tnt t − 0.30,(8.26)<br />

<strong>and</strong>,similarly,for Japan<br />

REER t = 0.66PROD t ,(8.27)<br />

these results were obtained by implementing exclusion restrictions on the full set<br />

of variables,indicated above.<br />

MacDonald (1999b) tests the EERM using the methods of Johansen. In particular,expression<br />

(8.3) is rearranged into one which is analytically equivalent,<br />

namely:<br />

s t = (1/(γ + η)) ·<br />

∞∑<br />

(η/(γ + η)) j · E t [m t+j − k t+j ],(8.28)<br />

j=0<br />

where we have set t = n <strong>and</strong><br />

k = K + α 1 p ∗ − α 5 (i ∗ + λ) + (α 4 + σα 1 )q + α 2 A.<br />

Expression (8.28) is useful from an estimation perspective for two key reasons. First,<br />

in the context of a present value model such as (8.28) if the dependent variable <strong>and</strong><br />

the right h<strong>and</strong> side variables are integrated of order 1, I (1),then it follows (see,for<br />

example,Campbell <strong>and</strong> Shiller (1987) <strong>and</strong> MacDonald <strong>and</strong> Taylor (1993)) that<br />

for the model to be valid s must be cointegrated with the right h<strong>and</strong> side variables.<br />

Second,the existence of cointegration facilitates the construction of a dynamic<br />

error correction model of the short-run exchange rate <strong>and</strong> its dynamic adjustment<br />

to the long-run equilibrium.<br />

The long-run equilibrium relationship,or cointegrating vector,implied by (8.28)<br />

is given as:<br />

¯s = β 0 ¯m + β 1 ȳ + β 2 ¯ p ∗ + β 3 ( ¯ i ∗ + ¯λ) + β 4 ¯ tnt + β 5 ¯ tot + β 6 Ā,(8.29)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!