28.02.2015 Views

Exchange Rate Economics: Theories and Evidence

Exchange Rate Economics: Theories and Evidence

Exchange Rate Economics: Theories and Evidence

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Empirical evidence on the monetary approach 161<br />

law of iterated mathematical projections,<strong>and</strong> using the past three equations,we<br />

can obtain:<br />

∞∑<br />

( ) i<br />

g ′ β1<br />

z t =<br />

h ′ A i z t ,<br />

1 + β 1<br />

i=1<br />

= h ′ φA(I − φA) −1 z t ,(6.47)<br />

where φ = (β 1 /1 + β 1 ). If equation (6.47) is to hold non-trivially,the following<br />

2p parameter restrictions can be imposed on the VAR:<br />

g ′ − h ′ φA(I − φA) −1 = 0,(6.48)<br />

<strong>and</strong> post-multiplying (6.48) by (I − φA) we can get a set of non-linear restrictions<br />

on the VAR for (ζ t , x t ) ′ :<br />

H 0 : g ′ (I − φA) − h ′ φA = 0. (6.49)<br />

The non-linear restrictions test is the third formal first test of the forward-looking<br />

monetary model. Fourth,a variance bounds test,popularised by Shiller (1980) in<br />

the context of the stock market literature,may be calculated using this framework.<br />

For example,if expectations are rational then it must follow that:<br />

ˆζ t = ζ t + u t ,(6.50)<br />

where u t is a r<strong>and</strong>om error <strong>and</strong> with rational expectations must be uncorrelated<br />

with ζ t . Given that variances cannot be negative,it must further follow that:<br />

Var(ζ t ) ≤ Var(ˆζ t ). (6.51)<br />

Such a test is seen as an improvement over the basic variance bounds tests used<br />

by,for example,Huang (1981) as it addresses the issue of non-stationarity in the<br />

presence of cointegration. A final test of the model can be obtained by noting that<br />

the perfect foresight spread, ˆζ t ,may be calculated as:<br />

ˆζ t = h ′ φA(I − φA) −1 z t .<br />

Campbell <strong>and</strong> Shiller argue that a simple graphical comparison of the calculated<br />

perfect foresight spread with the actual spread will give a qualitative measure of<br />

how well the model fits.<br />

In terms of the first test of the model,we saw in the previous section that a number<br />

of studies support cointegration of the exchange rate with monetary fundamentals<br />

particularly when the methods of Johansen or panel methods are used. Consider<br />

again the results of MacDonald <strong>and</strong> Taylor (1993),who use a data period spanning<br />

January 1976–December 1990 for the DM–USD. As we noted in Section 6.3.1,<br />

clear evidence of cointegration was found for the general system which included<br />

relative interest rates. The evidence of cointegration also existed for the base-line

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!