28.02.2015 Views

Exchange Rate Economics: Theories and Evidence

Exchange Rate Economics: Theories and Evidence

Exchange Rate Economics: Theories and Evidence

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

148 Empirical evidence on the monetary approach<br />

use the econometric methods of Johansen (1995) to determine the number of<br />

significant cointegrating vectors <strong>and</strong> also to place interpretable restrictions on the<br />

data. The money market relationship for the EU <strong>and</strong> US areas is analysed using<br />

the following vector,which represents a subset of the gross vector (6.22):<br />

x m′<br />

t =[(m t − p t ), y t , i t , p t ] ′ ,(6.23)<br />

where variables have the same interpretation as before. 5 Using the trace test of<br />

Johansen there was evidence of two significant cointegrating vectors for the EU<br />

<strong>and</strong> US systems <strong>and</strong> La Cour <strong>and</strong> MacDonald then implement joint hypothesis<br />

tests of the following form on the full cointegrating space (see Johansen <strong>and</strong> Juselius<br />

1992):<br />

Hypothesis : β ={H 1 φ 1 , H 2 φ 2 },<br />

this can be seen as the joint selection of two stationary relationships which are fully<br />

specified <strong>and</strong> identified. The results from this testing strategy produces a simple<br />

money market equation for the EU of the form<br />

m t − p t =−10.55 ∗ i t . (6.24)<br />

Equation (6.24) indicates that real money balances are negatively related to<br />

the opportunity cost variable,as st<strong>and</strong>ard monetary theory would predict. The<br />

fact that income is insignificant in this money dem<strong>and</strong> relation was unexpected,<br />

<strong>and</strong> probably reflected the small variation in this variable for the relatively short<br />

time span of the sample period. For the second vector,a stationary relationship<br />

between inflation <strong>and</strong> the interest rate,as suggested by the Fisher relationship,<br />

was shown to hold 6 <strong>and</strong> the test of the joint hypothesis that these two vectors<br />

define the cointegration space has a test statistic of 0.93,with a p-value of 0.63.<br />

A similar relationship is shown to hold for the US. Following this specific-togeneral<br />

approach,La Cour <strong>and</strong> MacDonald are able to identify the five significant<br />

cointegrating vectors in the gross system (6.22):<br />

m t − p t =−3.50i t ,(6.25)<br />

(0.66)<br />

m ∗ t − p ∗ t =−15.78i ∗ t<br />

(1.15)<br />

,(6.25 ′ )<br />

p t = i t ,(6.26)<br />

p ∗ t = i ∗ t ,(6.26′ )<br />

s t − p t + p ∗ t =−19.51i t<br />

(1.63)<br />

+ 46.58<br />

(2.77) i∗ t ,(6.27)<br />

where st<strong>and</strong>ard errors are in brackets. Equations (6.25) <strong>and</strong> (6.25 ′ ) represent<br />

EU <strong>and</strong> US money dem<strong>and</strong> relationships,respectively,<strong>and</strong> they have the<br />

same specification as that recovered from the partial system discussed earlier.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!