28.02.2015 Views

Exchange Rate Economics: Theories and Evidence

Exchange Rate Economics: Theories and Evidence

Exchange Rate Economics: Theories and Evidence

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

252 The new open economy macroeconomics part 1<br />

consider some extensions to the NOEM which have an important bearing on the<br />

issue of exchange rate volatility.<br />

10.1 The two-countryredux model<br />

10.1.1 The base-line two-country model<br />

The redux model is a two-country model <strong>and</strong> in each country there is a continuum<br />

of consumer–producers (sometimes referred to as yeoman farmers) that<br />

produce differentiated goods (0, n) in the home country <strong>and</strong> (n,1) in the foreign<br />

country (the discussion here follows Obstfeld <strong>and</strong> Rogoff 1995,1996 <strong>and</strong> Lane<br />

2001). Agents have perfect foresight <strong>and</strong> have monopoly power <strong>and</strong>,crucially,<br />

charge a price above marginal cost. This is an important assumption in this model<br />

because it means that output is at less than the socially optimum level <strong>and</strong> therefore<br />

expansionary monetary policy,say,can have a permanent effect on output. In our<br />

presentation of the model we will generally focus on the home relationships <strong>and</strong><br />

only introduce foreign relationships where it is helpful for the discussion. However,it<br />

is important to bear in mind that paralleling each of the home country<br />

relationships is usually an equivalent foreign country relationship. The preferences<br />

of the representative home agent, j,are assumed to be given by the following<br />

function:<br />

(<br />

∞∑<br />

β s−t<br />

U j<br />

t =<br />

s=t<br />

log C j s + η (<br />

Ms<br />

P s<br />

) 1−ε<br />

− κ 2 y s(j) 2 )<br />

,(10.1)<br />

where β is the subjective rate of time preference (0 0) <strong>and</strong> it is (implicitly) assumed that the inter-temporal<br />

elasticity of substitution is equal to unity (we return to this point in the final section).<br />

As we shall see later, θ is also the price elasticity of dem<strong>and</strong> facing the monopolist<br />

producer <strong>and</strong> the reason this is assumed to be greater than unity is to be consistent<br />

with the assumption of monopolistic competition. 1<br />

From equation (10.1) we see that agents derive positive utility from consumption<br />

<strong>and</strong> real money balances, M /P (because the latter reduce transactions costs),<br />

<strong>and</strong> disutility from work,which is assumed positively related to output. More<br />

specifically,suppose the disutility from work,l,is given by −φl <strong>and</strong> the production<br />

function is y = Al α or,alternatively,in inverted form l = (y/A) 1/α . Then<br />

if α = 1/2 <strong>and</strong> κ = 2φ/A 1/α we obtain the output term in equation (10.1).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!