28.02.2015 Views

Exchange Rate Economics: Theories and Evidence

Exchange Rate Economics: Theories and Evidence

Exchange Rate Economics: Theories and Evidence

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The new open economy macroeconomics part 2 281<br />

exchange rate pass-through,while countries with relatively high volatility of money<br />

growth have relatively high pass-through rates.<br />

11.4 Stochastic versions of the new open economy<br />

macroeconomic model: exchange rate volatility<br />

issues revisited<br />

Obstfeld <strong>and</strong> Rogoff (2000c) use a stochastic version of NOEM model to generate<br />

a variant of the forward-looking monetary model considered in Chapter 4. The<br />

basic difference here is that the introduction of uncertainty means that the forwardlooking<br />

reduced form features a risk premium term. Risk,however,has a more<br />

pervasive effect in this model,affecting the price-setting behaviour of individual<br />

producers <strong>and</strong> on expected output <strong>and</strong> international trade flows.<br />

In a stochastic context Obstfeld <strong>and</strong> Rogoff demonstrate that the solution for<br />

the expected value of the log of (world) consumption is:<br />

Ec = 1<br />

1+ρ<br />

{<br />

log<br />

( θ − 1<br />

θ<br />

)<br />

− E log κ − 1 [<br />

2 σ κ 2 2<br />

− 2n(1 − n)σs − 2 − 1 ]<br />

2 (1 − ρ)2<br />

× σ 2<br />

c − 2n(1 − n)(σ ks − σ k ∗ s) − 2 [nσ kc + (1 − n)σ k ∗ c]<br />

}<br />

,<br />

(11.15)<br />

where of terms not familiar from the previous chapter,the σi<br />

2 terms represent the<br />

variance of consumption, c,productivity,k,<strong>and</strong> the exchange rate,s,respectively,<br />

<strong>and</strong> the σ ij terms represent the corresponding covariance terms. Needless to say,the<br />

distinguishing factor between this expression <strong>and</strong> its certainty equivalent expression<br />

is that none of these uncertainty terms appear in the certainty equivalent version.<br />

Assuming all shocks are log-normally distributed allows Obstfeld <strong>and</strong> Rogoff to loglinearise<br />

the first-order conditions for consumption <strong>and</strong> money <strong>and</strong> using the firstorder<br />

conditions for money they are able to derive an equation for the exchange<br />

rate of the following form:<br />

s t = īε ∞∑<br />

( ) 1 s−t [<br />

E t m s − ms ∗ 1 + īε 1 + īε<br />

+ v s − vs<br />

∗ ]<br />

,(11.16)<br />

īε<br />

s=t<br />

where the risk premium, v t − vt ∗ ,is given by:<br />

( )<br />

v t − vt ∗ = 1 2<br />

σp 2 ∗ ,t − σ p,t<br />

2 + ρ(σ cp ∗ ,t − σ cp,t ),(11.17)<br />

<strong>and</strong> where the subscript p denotes the log of the price level <strong>and</strong> the overbar above<br />

the interest rate term reflects a non-stochastic steady-state value (which arises<br />

because the non-linearity of the money equilibrium condition makes it necessary to<br />

approximate it in the neighbourhood of a non-stochastic steady state),<strong>and</strong> ε is the<br />

consumption elasticity of the dem<strong>and</strong> for money. The term involving [v s − v ∗ s ]∞ s=t<br />

is referred to as the ‘level’ risk premium,<strong>and</strong> is not exactly equal to the st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />

forward market risk premium because of the existence of 1/ _ i ε. There are two

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!